Could GM have a perfomance shortfall with the ME?
#41
Burning Brakes
This chassis would make for a great C8 too - but it might be too wide to fit in your garage, LOL.
#42
Race Director
A lot has been. Made of the 100hp difference, but everyone seems to be missing the point of it. The ZR1 has more power BECAUSE IT COOLS BETTER. Powertrains now days are more limited by cooling abity than anything else. It takes a lot to cool down cars making 400+ no, with forced Induction, or spinning to high rpms.
What everyone must have missed at the Rolex 24 was the very real fear that the midengine Caddys may not finish the race to win. The single biggest drawback to a mode fine layout is cooling, because it's REALLY hard to pull off. All the cool air is in front of the car, and to cool an engine in the middle requires a lot more surface area to gather air for your cooling.
Whatever the mid engine car is (I think it's a caddy, not a Corvette), it will likely be down in hp quite a bit from the C7. It's highly possible that base versions of it will have less hp than a c7 or maybe even c6. It is highly unlikely the ME car will be faster than a c7zr1 around a track, and very plausible to think it won' be able to stay cool on a warm track day, based on GM undercooling previous high performance cars...
What everyone must have missed at the Rolex 24 was the very real fear that the midengine Caddys may not finish the race to win. The single biggest drawback to a mode fine layout is cooling, because it's REALLY hard to pull off. All the cool air is in front of the car, and to cool an engine in the middle requires a lot more surface area to gather air for your cooling.
Whatever the mid engine car is (I think it's a caddy, not a Corvette), it will likely be down in hp quite a bit from the C7. It's highly possible that base versions of it will have less hp than a c7 or maybe even c6. It is highly unlikely the ME car will be faster than a c7zr1 around a track, and very plausible to think it won' be able to stay cool on a warm track day, based on GM undercooling previous high performance cars...
#43
Race Director
A lot has been. Made of the 100hp difference, but everyone seems to be missing the point of it. The ZR1 has more power BECAUSE IT COOLS BETTER. Powertrains now days are more limited by cooling abity than anything else. It takes a lot to cool down cars making 400+ no, with forced Induction, or spinning to high rpms.
What everyone must have missed at the Rolex 24 was the very real fear that the midengine Caddys may not finish the race to win. The single biggest drawback to a mode fine layout is cooling, because it's REALLY hard to pull off. All the cool air is in front of the car, and to cool an engine in the middle requires a lot more surface area to gather air for your cooling.
Whatever the mid engine car is (I think it's a caddy, not a Corvette), it will likely be down in hp quite a bit from the C7. It's highly possible that base versions of it will have less hp than a c7 or maybe even c6. It is highly unlikely the ME car will be faster than a c7zr1 around a track, and very plausible to think it won' be able to stay cool on a warm track day, based on GM undercooling previous high performance cars...
What everyone must have missed at the Rolex 24 was the very real fear that the midengine Caddys may not finish the race to win. The single biggest drawback to a mode fine layout is cooling, because it's REALLY hard to pull off. All the cool air is in front of the car, and to cool an engine in the middle requires a lot more surface area to gather air for your cooling.
Whatever the mid engine car is (I think it's a caddy, not a Corvette), it will likely be down in hp quite a bit from the C7. It's highly possible that base versions of it will have less hp than a c7 or maybe even c6. It is highly unlikely the ME car will be faster than a c7zr1 around a track, and very plausible to think it won' be able to stay cool on a warm track day, based on GM undercooling previous high performance cars...
My Gallardo has done track events in the Texas summers and never had a cooling issue. Having dry sump with larger oil capacity and an oil cooler certainly help. I was able to drive it hard the full 20 minutes sessions. With my C5Z I never could run 20 minutes without having to slow down due to oil temps getting over 300 degrees.
My Gallardo is a 2004 the ZO6 was a 2003 so it is a fair comparison that no matter what the layout it can be cooled properly. It isn’t inherent to just the layout. The Gallardo is 500hp the z06 was 405. So the mid engine 100 hp higher car stayed cooler on the track.
Last edited by rgregory; 03-07-2018 at 06:21 PM.
#44
Race Director
I thought the Caddy’s had no issues the year before. It was a different engine displacement for this year, smaller displacement might have been working harder.
My Gallardo has done track events in the Texas summers and never had a cooling issue. Having dry sump with larger oil capacity and an oil cooler certainly help. I was able to drive it hard the full 20 minutes sessions. With my C5Z I never could run 20 minutes without having to slow down due to oil temps getting over 300 degrees.
My Gallardo is a 2004 the ZO6 was a 2003 so it is a fair comparison that no matter what the layout it can be cooled properly. It isn’t inherent to just the layout. The Gallardo is 500hp the z06 was 405. So the mid engine 100 hp higher car stayed cooler on the track.
My Gallardo has done track events in the Texas summers and never had a cooling issue. Having dry sump with larger oil capacity and an oil cooler certainly help. I was able to drive it hard the full 20 minutes sessions. With my C5Z I never could run 20 minutes without having to slow down due to oil temps getting over 300 degrees.
My Gallardo is a 2004 the ZO6 was a 2003 so it is a fair comparison that no matter what the layout it can be cooled properly. It isn’t inherent to just the layout. The Gallardo is 500hp the z06 was 405. So the mid engine 100 hp higher car stayed cooler on the track.
It's not that it can't be overcome, it just costs money, space, and weight. People won't pay Lambo .mney for a GM. They won't pay even close to it.
My point is, to hit a price point that GM can play in, they're going to have to downsize their power output compared to a c7z or c7zr1. It may make less power than a base c7 or even c6 to stay cool.
#45
Race Director
The Gallardo also cost something like 4 or 5 times as much as the c5z did?
It's not that it can't be overcome, it just costs money, space, and weight. People won't pay Lambo .mney for a GM. They won't pay even close to it.
My point is, to hit a price point that GM can play in, they're going to have to downsize their power output compared to a c7z or c7zr1. It may make less power than a base c7 or even c6 to stay cool.
It's not that it can't be overcome, it just costs money, space, and weight. People won't pay Lambo .mney for a GM. They won't pay even close to it.
My point is, to hit a price point that GM can play in, they're going to have to downsize their power output compared to a c7z or c7zr1. It may make less power than a base c7 or even c6 to stay cool.
I don’t think they should have any issue making a ME car not overheat and it should not cost much money. Even if they go with dual radiators, a radiator doesn’t cost GM probably much more than $150.