When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Figure 1 is a stock spring, Figure 2 is a stock spring compared to a higher rate spring, and Figure 3 is a stock spring compared to the spring with increased pre-load.
So work Figure 3 in reverse and consider the stiffer suspension to be the stock suspension and then note the effect of less spring pre-load as making a softer suspension.
Also, Figure 3 shows the effect of spring pre-load as being a translation which is the netting of a constant value. So overall, changes in spring pre-load do not change the spring rate but translates the use of the spring to a different force range of the spring
.
Having Z51 and Also E60 Does Not Result In Height Adjustability Loss
I wrote to Harlan seeking clarification as this was a significant question as to whether having Z51 and E60 resulted in the loss of adjusting spring perches height adjustability.
Originally Posted by John
Your help again please!
SUBJ: If Z51 & E60 combined, retains ride height adjustability?
Harlan,
Thanks. This has been a hot topic in both forums this past weekend, but I did not want to bother you during the weekend.
We all so appreciated your response back a week ago, then confirming that as we thought, that the Z51 has adjustable spring perches to adjust ride height.
However, if one were to get a Z51 and add in additionally E60 lift option, does one lose the ability to adjust a C8’s height?[/Quote=JohnElegant]
[[b]Quote=Harlan]It’s two different things so one does not effect the other.
Now - if someone lowers there car with Z51 spring seats, obviously the front lift will not go as high as it is all relative.
1.57" isn't that much of a drop. To go lower, i'm assuming aftermarket coilovers/lowering springs are necessary?
Yes but 1.57 is actually a very significant drop. Usually h&r oe performance springs drop .8" or so, more aggressive sport springs around 1.25" and dumped "race" springs around 1.75". I just use those as examples.
Lower than 1.57" and you're scraping everything and really going for a "stanced" look as opposed to performance. Id be shocked if any reputable aftermarket coilovers would be at their optimum damping dropped lower than that either. They may alllow you to dump to 2" but the ride and performance of the damper would be outside its range and suffer
Yes but 1.57 is actually a very significant drop. Usually h&r oe performance springs drop .8" or so, more aggressive sport springs around 1.25" and dumped "race" springs around 1.75". I just use those as examples.
Lower than 1.57" and you're scraping everything and really going for a "stanced" look as opposed to performance. Id be shocked if any reputable aftermarket coilovers would be at their optimum damping dropped lower than that either. They may alllow you to dump to 2" but the ride and performance of the damper would be outside its range and suffer
Mike
What about rear clearance? For those of us leaning toward the lift option, how much higher is rear ground clearance? After all we would be backing out of these steep/semi-steep driveways too.
What about rear clearance? For those of us leaning toward the lift option, how much higher is rear ground clearance? After all we would be backing out of these steep/semi-steep driveways too.
As far as it is advertised and implemented on other platforms this is a front axle lift only. It is not air ride that raises the entire car. The rear of our car would technically be a minute bit lower with the front axle lift raised. Generally, raising the front only takes care of most clearances. The rear diffuser area should be able to clear most driveways backing out. If you back out you can leave the front lift down until the rear clears the crevice and then stop the car and raise the front and continue backing out. Doubt you'd need to though. Rear should be fine.
Great thread. Clearly GM knows the C8 looks better to the eye of most people with smaller tire/fender gaps as evidenced by the 3 original reveal cars and the images on the C8 configurator. Hoping all C8 owners can achieve that same look if they are so inclined and are not limited by base vs Z51 vs front end lift, etc.
Great thread. Clearly GM knows the C8 looks better to the eye of most people with smaller tire/fender gaps as evidenced by the 3 original reveal cars and the images on the C8 configurator. Hoping all C8 owners can achieve that same look if they are so inclined and are not limited by base vs Z51 vs front end lift, etc.
GM has done this for a long time, when I bought my 94 Grand AM GT new and my 95 Trans Am, both of their brochures showed the cars sitting at least 1.5 inches lower than the production cars. I ended up putting lowering springs into both cars in order to satisfy my needs. Large wheel gaps really bother me and the Corvette has suffered from that for pretty much every generation made.
I cornered one of the engineers(who asked not to be named) at Laguna Seca raceway last weekend and asked about this. He told me the reveal cars were weighed down so they would sit lower. Then he said the cars will settle after some driving. The Zeus Bronze car was exactly one inch higher on all 4 corners than the red cutaway car they had... yes I took a tape measure. The red car was obviously adjusted to the lowest point in the rear. The front, with the front end lift was hard to see any threads or adjustments.
Don't know how precise the factory sets the corner weights, but jacking with the perch height will undoubtedly change the wheels weights, which can cause wheel lock under braking, among other handling issues. Additionally, the geometry of the suspension is designed for a certain ride height. Changing the ride height will adversely effect the bump steer, that is toe in or toe out under bump. Be very cautious in making these changes you could be creating an unpleasant handling vehicle.
Don't know how precise the factory sets the corner weights, but jacking with the perch height will undoubtedly change the wheels weights, which can cause wheel lock under braking, among other handling issues. Additionally, the geometry of the suspension is designed for a certain ride height. Changing the ride height will adversely effect the bump steer, that is toe in or toe out under bump. Be very cautious in making these changes you could be creating an unpleasant handling vehicle.
Yes if you adjust ride height, you should the car realigned. Sometimes it is not enough. There is a reason they make dropped spindles.
Yes if you adjust ride height, you should the car realigned. Sometimes it is not enough. There is a reason they make dropped spindles.
You'll need a setup platform to get wheel weights correct and new steering components to correct for bump steer change. Spindles will lower the car, but so will adjusting the spring perches.
Don't know how precise the factory sets the corner weights, but jacking with the perch height will undoubtedly change the wheels weights, which can cause wheel lock under braking, among other handling issues. Additionally, the geometry of the suspension is designed for a certain ride height. Changing the ride height will adversely effect the bump steer, that is toe in or toe out under bump. Be very cautious in making these changes you could be creating an unpleasant handling vehicle.
I don’t know but...I would think at a minimum your going to need an alignment after any lowering. That was true of C7yeah?
I don’t know but...I would think at a minimum your going to need an alignment after any lowering. That was true of C7yeah?
I agree, but it still makes many unwanted changes that can't be corrected by an alignment. The largest change will be in bump steer which is very important for proper handling. Perhaps they have different steering components to correct these issues, but I seriously doubt anyone, outside of a racer, would take the time and expense to do it right.