When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Who here would like to see the Z06 as a fixed roof like the C6 was? I would for one. To me, a fixed roof promotes the race car spirit, and that is what a Z06 is all about, a race car tuned down enough for the street. The fixed roof may add a little stiffness regardless of how the framework is designed, and the car can't be too stiff. It may also reduce the weight of the car a bit, and that reduction comes at the very top of the car, which is the best place to lose weight.
I don't think we will see the fixed roof, though. Those of you that prefer the removable top or convertible are safe.
The C5 FRC was designed initially to be a low cost offering. The vision was that with the less expensive roof/rear window and fewer options a more entry level car could be offered. It ended up evolving into the Z06.
The *only* reason the C6 Z06 cars had a fixed roof was because it was necessary for chassis rigidity. While base model and Grand Sport cars got a steel frame, the new aluminum frame for the Z06 was not strong enough for a removable roof or convertible.
The C7 Chassis was engineered to be rigid enough in aluminum to have the roof removed and be used in all models.
The C8 chassis is also engineered to that standard. There is no reason to prevent the roof from being removed. If someone does not want the roof removed they can simply not remove it.
Fixed roof is a non starter for me. I am a convertible guy though. I ordered the removable roof c8 to get as soon as possible . I am on list for Z06 but will wait for Z06 Convertible.
I can see track guys wanting the fixed roof but doubt there would be enough demand for it.Remember there was a fixed roof c5 before they introduced the z06 so they didn't do a special body for it.
GM porked up the Z06 for C7 and sold a ton of them. They're not going to go backwards and do a de-contented race car again. If anything they'll find a way to add even more $1000 carbon fiber trim bits to bulk up the option sheet.
Someone had posted a while back that GM will keep the removable roof because a fixed roof car must have a side airbag that is in the roof according to federal regulations. A removable roof car can have the side airbag in the seat as the C6 & C7 does and the C8 will. Not sure how the C6 ZO6 bypassed that regulation if that was true.
Having said that, I also would like to have a non-removable roof option.
The C5 FRC was designed initially to be a low cost offering. The vision was that with the less expensive roof/rear window and fewer options a more entry level car could be offered. It ended up evolving into the Z06.
The *only* reason the C6 Z06 cars had a fixed roof was because it was necessary for chassis rigidity. While base model and Grand Sport cars got a steel frame, the new aluminum frame for the Z06 was not strong enough for a removable roof or convertible.
The C7 Chassis was engineered to be rigid enough in aluminum to have the roof removed and be used in all models.
The C8 chassis is also engineered to that standard. There is no reason to prevent the roof from being removed. If someone does not want the roof removed they can simply not remove it.
Someone had posted a while back that GM will keep the removable roof because a fixed roof car must have a side airbag that is in the roof according to federal regulations.
This is what I believe to be true as well, airbag safety regulations drive the decision not performance or structural rigidity targets. I would like to see the regulation code if anyone knows where to find it. The Wrangler and Gladiator would fall into this roof category as well, and of course actual convertibles.
Fixed roof is a non starter for me. I am a convertible guy though. I ordered the removable roof c8 to get as soon as possible . I am on list for Z06 but will wait for Z06 Convertible.
I can see track guys wanting the fixed roof but doubt there would be enough demand for it.Remember there was a fixed roof c5 before they introduced the z06 so they didn't do a special body for it.
Same here...must be a Vert (Hey I live in Cocoa Beach, Fl.) and am waiting to see what the Z06 engine will be (Personally hoping for a 3.9 ish liter DOHC TT V8 w ~650 H.P., ala McLaren and Ferrari).
A fixed roof could result in deleting the rear trunk so the car would be shorter and lighter. Loose a couple of hundred pounds and 10 inches for a stripped down track version and put in a 5.5 L flat crank with 600 hp. Now we're talking some serious performance. Not going to happen.
Who here would like to see the Z06 as a fixed roof like the C6 was? I would for one. To me, a fixed roof promotes the race car spirit, and that is what a Z06 is all about, a race car tuned down enough for the street. The fixed roof may add a little stiffness regardless of how the framework is designed, and the car can't be too stiff. It may also reduce the weight of the car a bit, and that reduction comes at the very top of the car, which is the best place to lose weight.
I don't think we will see the fixed roof, though. Those of you that prefer the removable top or convertible are safe.
They CAN'T do a fixed roof car. The airbag regulations won't permit it. This is part of what killed Viper (beyond the whole 'not selling' problem). A fixed-roof car must have roof-curtain airbags (my ZL1 and Nissan 370Z both have them). By selling the car as an open-top car, they dodge these regs and can get away with just putting the airbag in the seat. The best you're likely to get is a car with a removable roof that is bolted down to make it hard to remove, but still removable (which is what the C6 Z06 was).
Unfortunately, the realities of a mass-market sports car sold in the US with US safety regs makes the car you want out of reach for the manufacturer, even if they wanted to build it.
A fixed roof could result in deleting the rear trunk so the car would be shorter and lighter. Loose a couple of hundred pounds and 10 inches for a stripped down track version and put in a 5.5 L flat crank with 600 hp. Now we're talking some serious performance. Not going to happen.
A fixed roof car will not result in removing the rear trunk and shortening the car because:
1.) Economies of scale dictate that all the cars be produced with as close to a common chassis as possible, so no one-offs.
2.) The golf-club set would still want the space for their golf-clubs.
3.) The proportions would be blown out of the water and the car would have to be redesigned. Ie the car was styled with the trunk in place. Removing it requires restyling the car to make it not look 'chopped'.
This is what I believe to be true as well, airbag safety regulations drive the decision not performance or structural rigidity targets. I would like to see the regulation code if anyone knows where to find it. The Wrangler and Gladiator would fall into this roof category as well, and of course actual convertibles.
It was me that posted that.
The reg:
The Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) regulation #226.
The phase-in was 2017. Most manufacturers took steps to get there in one form or another in their cars years ago, but everybody that did a refresh or new-generation had to implement it.
It seems to me that since the removable roof and convertibles are exempted from air bag requirements, then it is just a matter of time until that exemption is eliminated in favor of safety. The only option left at that point is a fixed roof. In that scenario, the challenge will be to make the roof as thin as possible while still housing an air bag.
It seems to me that since the removable roof and convertibles are exempted from air bag requirements, then it is just a matter of time until that exemption is eliminated in favor of safety. The only option left at that point is a fixed roof. In that scenario, the challenge will be to make the roof as thin as possible while still housing an air bag.
The only way to eliminate the exemption is to eliminate convertibles. The Feds have come close a time or two, but so far there's been enough pressure from enthusiasts to prevent it from happening. I could see an environment where they make them put the bag in the door. The Ferrari convertibles and Alfa 4c have them there.
Who here would like to see the Z06 as a fixed roof like the C6 was? I would for one. To me, a fixed roof promotes the race car spirit, and that is what a Z06 is all about, a race car tuned down enough for the street. The fixed roof may add a little stiffness regardless of how the framework is designed, and the car can't be too stiff. It may also reduce the weight of the car a bit, and that reduction comes at the very top of the car, which is the best place to lose weight.
I don't think we will see the fixed roof, though. Those of you that prefer the removable top or convertible are safe.
Never going to happen. The topless Z cars including the ZR1 were major hits for GM.
The only way to eliminate the exemption is to eliminate convertibles. The Feds have come close a time or two, but so far there's been enough pressure from enthusiasts to prevent it from happening. I could see an environment where they make them put the bag in the door. The Ferrari convertibles and Alfa 4c have them there.
I don't think your statement is quite true. For many years in the 70's and 80's, all U.S. manufacturers eliminated convertibles from their lineup due to safety concerns even though there was no federal requirement to do so. If a federal requirement for the elimination of convertibles were actually put in place these days, it would happen in a heartbeat. Not saying I want to see that, but it's just reality.
A fixed roof could result in deleting the rear trunk so the car would be shorter and lighter. Loose a couple of hundred pounds and 10 inches for a stripped down track version and put in a 5.5 L flat crank with 600 hp. Now we're talking some serious performance. Not going to happen.
This is not how it works. Do people just ignore the numerous posts that show how the DCT literally goes all the way to the CF bumper beam. The rear end of the car is where it is because of the transaxle. The trunk was made to fill the void above the DCT and between the bumper and the engine. GM could remove the trunk and install a high mount exhaust like other mid engine makers but it wouldn't shorten the car.
I don't think your statement is quite true. For many years in the 70's and 80's, all U.S. manufacturers eliminated convertibles from their lineup due to safety concerns even though there was no federal requirement to do so. If a federal requirement for the elimination of convertibles were actually put in place these days, it would happen in a heartbeat. Not saying I want to see that, but it's just reality.
But the elimination was based on the THREAT of Federal Regs, not based on any inherent desire to eliminate what was, at the time, a very profitable market segment. Obviously, if the Feds put out regulations, the manufacturers have to comply, but enthusiast pressure has kept them from doing a number of things that they've proposed.
The Feds were talking, at one point, about making modified cars illegal in their entirety, but there was enough pressure that they backed off.
Who here would like to see the Z06 as a fixed roof like the C6 was? I would for one. To me, a fixed roof promotes the race car spirit, and that is what a Z06 is all about, a race car tuned down enough for the street. The fixed roof may add a little stiffness regardless of how the framework is designed, and the car can't be too stiff. It may also reduce the weight of the car a bit, and that reduction comes at the very top of the car, which is the best place to lose weight.
I don't think we will see the fixed roof, though. Those of you that prefer the removable top or convertible are safe.
No thanks. I'll take mine with a removable roof panel. Or as a spyder. I love my C7 Z06 with removable roof panel, and I have no interest whatsoever in having a fixed roof. It would just subtract from the fun.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.