When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
"Too often we found ourselves running into the rev limiter, or having downshifts denied after a paddle pull."
Well duh, that's an operator problem. What is the car supposed to do if the driver is dumb enough to ask for operation outside the engine's rev range, Road and Track?
"Too often we found ourselves running into the rev limiter, or having downshifts denied after a paddle pull."
Well duh, that's an operator problem. What is the car supposed to do if the driver is dumb enough to ask for operation outside the engine's rev range, Road and Track?
"Too often we found ourselves running into the rev limiter, or having downshifts denied after a paddle pull."
Well duh, that's an operator problem. What is the car supposed to do if the driver is dumb enough to ask for operation outside the engine's rev range, Road and Track?
its supposed to queue the shift to be made when the revs drop down into the appropriate range. It’s if you were to shift while slowing down, but caught the paddle just a bit too quick.
its supposed to queue the shift to be made when the revs drop down into the appropriate range. It’s if you were to shift while slowing down, but caught the paddle just a bit too quick.
With the C8 you can shift down to the lowest available gear by holding the paddle, and it will continue to do so as the speed goes down. I wonder why they didn't do this to overcome the issue with it not queueing gears.
"Too often we found ourselves running into the rev limiter, or having downshifts denied after a paddle pull."
Well duh, that's an operator problem. What is the car supposed to do if the driver is dumb enough to ask for operation outside the engine's rev range, Road and Track?
Sounds like a machine-human interface issue. Looks like Chevy has problems. This appears to be a software integration problem.
Don't forget, this is the first go for GM and the supplier for DCT. And Chevy's last auto in the C7 has been a bust too.
Last edited by LowRyter; Nov 11, 2019 at 07:26 PM.
With the C8 you can shift down to the lowest available gear by holding the paddle, and it will continue to do so as the speed goes down. I wonder why they didn't do this to overcome the issue with it not queueing gears.
So you think they didn't read the directions or hear the briefing before they wrote this?
Last edited by LowRyter; Nov 11, 2019 at 07:30 PM.
Sounds like a machine-human interface issue. Looks like Chevy has problems. This appears to be a software integration problem.
I don't think so. As Jason said above, if one wants to cue downshifts as they come into range, you simply keep the downshift paddle pulled. That way, you don't have stored downshifts occurring when you don't expect them, or at inopportune times, or when you no longer want them. The geniuses at R&T just didn't know how to work the car.
Last edited by Warp Factor; Nov 11, 2019 at 07:50 PM.
No, not really the first go-round since Tremec bought Hoerbiger Drivetrain Mechatronics, which has been doing DCTs for many years!
well OK!
But you still didn't consider the substance of the complaint.
Originally Posted by Warp Factor
I don't think so. As Jason said above, if one wants to cue downshifts as they come into range, you simply keep the downshift paddle pulled. That way, you don't have stored downshifts occurring when you don't expect them, or at inopportune times, or when you no longer want them. R&T just didn't know how to work the car.
..........and you know how to work the car since you've driven one so many miles?? ????????? ?
Really?
Last edited by Steve Garrett; Nov 11, 2019 at 10:35 PM.
Reason: Merged Posts-please use the Multi-Quote button to make your response look like this.
..........and you know how to work the car since you've driven one so many miles?? ????????? ?
Really?
It ain't rocket science. It's the same strategy GM has used on past transmissions, and it works very well, if one was paying attention in class and knows how to use it.
It ain't rocket science. It's the same strategy GM has used on past transmissions, and it works very well, if one was paying attention in class and knows how to use it.
So you're implying that you've driven one? Or know better than someone that has and is writing about it?
The writers prefer an actual automatic shift at the rev limiter in manual mode and prefer to have the downshift saved. Having owned and driven an E46 M3 that did both of those things (like the C8) I much prefer that to upshifting when I don't want it to (If I do, next lap I will) or saving the downshift until just after I start turn-in and have the rear spin out because I was already cornering at the limit of the tires.
These are the same guys that prefer a manual tranny. Do they expect the manual tranny to upshift at the rev limiter by itself? Do they expect to do a downshift that will over rev the engine? not if they have to pay for the damage .
I don't think so. As Jason said above, if one wants to cue downshifts as they come into range, you simply keep the downshift paddle pulled. That way, you don't have stored downshifts occurring when you don't expect them, or at inopportune times, or when you no longer want them. The geniuses at R&T just didn't know how to work the car.
Chevy was on hand babysitting the car when they tested it. I’d wager a guess that *someone* there explained it to them. Or at least made suggestions when the guys complained after driving it.
Chevy was on hand babysitting the car when they tested it. I’d wager a guess that *someone* there explained it to them. Or at least made suggestions when the guys complained after driving it.
It sounds like they complained when they published, and only later got an explanation from a GM power train engineer, according to the article:
"At a powertrain engineering seminar held by Chevy last week, we asked Glen Hoeflinn, controls program manager for the DCT, what will change from the car we drove..... The C8 has two manual modes. If you pull a paddle while in Drive, you get a temporary manual mode, which automatically times out, or can be exited sooner by holding the upshift paddle. In this mode, the car will automatically upshift at redline. If you press the M button in the center console, you get full manual mode. There's no time out, and the car won't upshift at redline.
There are two other neat tricks available for drivers to exploit. First, if you hold the downshift paddle, the DCT will serve up the lowest possible gear. Do that while braking, and the transmission will keep downshifting as engine speed allows. And second, pulling both paddles at the same time is equivalent to pushing in the clutch pedal on a manual car, which allows you to rev the C8's new V-8 as much as you want."
Cammisa said they discussed it with the Chevy guys when they were out there testing. I’m guessing the new article which was written after Chevys tech day last week was to provide some confirmation of what many of us have said which is to expect updated and improved programming over time.
Cammisa said they discussed it with the Chevy guys when they were out there testing. I’m guessing the new article which was written after Chevys tech day last week was to provide some confirmation of what many of us have said which is to expect updated and improved programming over time.
Then why did R&T complain about downshifts being denied (apparently not knowing about holding the paddle), and hitting the rev limiter in manual mode? These aren't anything new. GM has used the this paddle strategy on prior transmissions (the A8) for a number of years. Maybe R&T didn't know how to work those transmissions either.
And Chevy's last auto in the C7 has been a bust too.
A bust too, as in inclusive. So now with all your in depth knowledge, the Tremec DCT it is officially a bust? Why don't you go get in your FWD econobox and tell the world that good gas mileage and a cheap price is what the definition of performance is.
Last edited by Phil1098; Nov 11, 2019 at 11:17 PM.
Hopefully the transmission makes me choose the gear that I want ,and hold that gear for as long as I would like....it’s all that I ask for...if not... my car will be on drive all the time and my paddles wouldn’t even be touched,and I’ll officially become a waxer.
Then why did R&T complain about downshifts being denied (apparently not knowing about holding the paddle), and hitting the rev limiter in manual mode? These aren't anything new. GM has used the this paddle strategy on prior transmissions (the A8) for a number of years. Maybe R&T didn't know how to work those transmissions either.
.
It's odd isn't it? If they didn't want to hit the redline they could've kept it in Auto and let it shift up for them, then click the downshift or hold it so it can drop as many gears as it needs to, and either manually upshift or let it automatically do it. I don't see any reason why they would use manual mode if automatic gives them the exact thing they desire. On top of that they actually knocked it for denying downshifts and hitting the rev limit....it's in manual mode though so you should expect it to be exactly that?? Isn't that more engaging for the driver so you can get that nice driving experience™?
Yea I'm gonna have to wait until I drive the car myself.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.