When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well that would solve my problem too, get more low end torque and hp kind of like todays Z06 but in the C8 config. I would definitely go with the Z 06 in a Vert
l think what makes the answer difficult is that nobody has mass produced a 600 HP NA FPC V8 over 5L. So there are no exact points of reference. If we assume the displacement is 5.5l and that GM can overcome FPC vibration issues for an engine that size, extrapolating the Ford voodoo 5.2l v8 power would give a 5.5l 558hp & 453tq. If you stretch that to 600hp you are going to move the power band higher with HP peaks in 8000rpm range and torque probably lower in number with peak in the 5000rpm range. Saying this because you would probably need a shorter intake track that’s has been tuned for higher rpm airflow vs low/midrange. Also your cams will have to be more optimized for top end. The best advice I could give would be to drive a current Shelby gt350. A Z06 with 600hp NA is going to feel more “peaky” than the Ford but the Gt350 would give the sensation of what a larger FPC engine feels like. Good luck on your choice.
Thanks Beastboy nice answer/advice. Now to find a Shelby Gt 350 somewhere in Michigan this time of year yikes. I was also wanting to get away from the excessive understeer reported in the tests the Z car will certainly be more neutral.
The talk of electric motors up front are being spoken about for the Zora if it ever really lives and would run $150k+
What I'm talking about or trying to get info about is the probable 600hp NA flat plane in the Z06 not a ZR1 which might likely be twin turbo or the ZORA which might add the electric motor to a ZR1 setup. The reason I'm asking is I am on the verge of cancelling my Z51 vert order and putting down $ for a Z06. I just don't want to lose low end back road fun performance even though the FPC 600hp would be way better on a track, I wouldn't track it more than a couple of times a yr.
It just seems like hybrids are going to be the trend, of the future. It fixes a lot of problems. Fixes low end torque problems, that the FPC motor will have. And it makes the car looks like its going green. Even though it will be more toxic than ever, to the environment. With the disposal of the lithium ion battery, when its no good.
I,m thinking the z06 would be the FPC motor, with the electric motors. Zora would be the twin turbo, with the electric motors.
I recently saw a youtube vlog can't remember from who, but any way the guy says he doesn't think the flat plane crank motor, (likely in the Z06 and up) will hold up nearly as well at the LT2, as the Flat Plan design is inherently weaker. I don't pretend to be knowledgeable in this area would like to know what others with actual expertise in this area think. I hope this has not already been posted as it really brings out the trolls. If it has just ignore it.
It is really simple, friction goes up at least with the square of speed. The higher the rpm, all other things being equal, the shorter the life. Also since flat planes typically have more significant vibrations, that induces it’s own stresses on bearings. So more wear on rings and bearings means shorter life.
I fear the fpc. Now it can be salvaged (in my book) with being force induction. That is the thing it will need to satisfy those of use coming from the last 2 gen Z06's as even the LS7 was no slouch low in the revs. And the C7Z is an animal even under 3k having so much torque it feels and drives nothing like an LT1 car (the LT1 accelerates like Honda vtec v the LT4 a sbc). Both are quick but one is in another league.
You're not going to get that out of an NA fpc given the LT2 at 495/470..
I fear the fpc. Now it can be salvaged (in my book) with being force induction. That is the thing it will need to satisfy those of use coming from the last 2 gen Z06's as even the LS7 was no slouch low in the revs. And the C7Z is an animal even under 3k having so much torque it feels and drives nothing like an LT1 car (the LT1 accelerates like Honda vtec v the LT4 a sbc). Both are quick but one is in another league.
You're not going to get that out of an NA fpc given the LT2 at 495/470..
this is my concern and why I asked the original question- I test drove a C7 Z06/07 and it ruined me for my C7, was just getting ready for a C7 Z when GM pulled this on me. I love the C8 and will get one but am so torn between my present allocation which now may not show up until August now and getting a C8 Z if the C8 Z doesn't have the low end torque and you need to get the revs up to get to the torque band I think it will take most of the fun out of daily driving it. So for me an LT2 with turbos would be great. Really would rather a Super charger but my understanding is space is an issue and you have to get a really good SC to keep heat out of the equation(saw a video recently where someone put a big magnuson SC on a camaro ZL1 and it was extremely cool temperature wise because it had way bigger bricks than the OEM one.
Super charging, would be the best bang for the buck choice.
I would love to do that. But the big problem is you will exceed the torque capacity of the DTC.
Now upgrading that will cost big bucks.
Super charging, would be the best bang for the buck choice.
I would love to do that. But the big problem is you will exceed the torque capacity of the DTC.
Now upgrading that will cost big bucks.
If that's the case then the Z will be running no more than 600hp the zR1 the same. I think either your wrong or they will beef up the DCT they are not going to put out substantially lower HP TQ cars than previous gens. A 650/650 in the Z matching the C7 wouldn't surprise me either.
If that's the case then the Z will be running no more than 600hp the zR1 the same. I think either your wrong or they will beef up the DCT they are not going to put out substantially lower HP TQ cars than previous gens. A 650/650 in the Z matching the C7 wouldn't surprise me either.
They will undoubtedly do whatever it takes for the DCT to handle much higher loads.
It is simple logic that they will upgrade the new LT2 block to the previous 4/5 standards and harness the incredible torque curves that they have to produce acceleration never before seen in a corvette. The HP/Torque numbers should be even slightly higher than in the C7 because of their reportedly “better flow”.
The ratios in the DCT will have to change as well, and the C8 Z cars will not see the relative drop in performance at the high end that the base model is encountering.
This should allow them to launch the Z06 and ZR1 earlier in this cycle than otherwise.
The big question is, how do they control the incredible acceleration and speed that these cars will be able to generate.
They are going to have their work cut out for them to get the handling and braking to match them.
This should not preclude their efforts to develop some new FPC platform as they develop these low fruit. This could lead to the imagined “Zora”.
They will undoubtedly do whatever it takes for the DCT to handle much higher loads.
It is simple logic that they will upgrade the new LT2 block to the previous 4/5 standards and harness the incredible torque curves that they have to produce acceleration never before seen in a corvette. The HP/Torque numbers should be even slightly higher than in the C7 because of their reportedly “better flow”.
The ratios in the DCT will have to change as well, and the C8 Z cars will not see the relative drop in performance at the high end that the base model is encountering.
This should allow them to launch the Z06 and ZR1 earlier in this cycle than otherwise.
The big question is, how do they control the incredible acceleration and speed that these cars will be able to generate.
They are going to have their work cut out for them to get the handling and braking to match them.
This should not preclude their efforts to develop some new FPC platform as they develop these low fruit. This could lead to the imagined “Zora”.
Agree completely- however I dont think they will have that much trouble controlling the acceleration and speed. They can make the gear ratios a little less aggressive and also add comparable performing parts (wheels, tires, suspension upgrades as seen in the C7 Z and the C7 ZR1) Cars like the M 720s have this kind power and have no problem.
I think we're going to learn a lot indirectly about Chevy's plans for the upgraded C8s by January. When the C8R debuts (which we know is a flat plane), we'll learn if it's going to be an overhead cam or a pushrod engine. Due to IMSA rules the engines run have to be "based" upon a production engine. Not saying they have to BE a production engine, but just based on one. Since (IMO) the design of the engine is significantly different for a OHC vs. a pushrod engine, that should give us a really good clue as to which way the Z06/ZR1/whatever C8 models will go.
As far as driveability goes, I really, REALLY, hope that they don't sacrifice low end torque; that's where we live from day to day. I've driven an S2000 before, and the wait to get into the powerband just numbed the brain.
So, hang on to your allocation; you may get a lot clearer picture in January.
Just do a regular v8 with turbos...what is everyone fantasizing about with this flat plane crap. It has a dct now - there is no need to rev to 15,000. Can still go overhead cams but people will complain more about fpc than they did on the c7 tail lights lol
The marketers have really succeeded with their seduction regarding FPC.
Every modern 4 cylinder and V6 engine in econoboxes and minivans has a FPC. It isn't some magical device. It's simply one approach that could be used in a V8, and it comes with real drawbacks, particularly with higher displacements in that application.
I really hope they don't put a FPC in the higher hp variants.
I think we're going to learn a lot indirectly about Chevy's plans for the upgraded C8s by January. When the C8R debuts (which we know is a flat plane), we'll learn if it's going to be an overhead cam or a pushrod engine. Due to IMSA rules the engines run have to be "based" upon a production engine. Not saying they have to BE a production engine, but just based on one. Since (IMO) the design of the engine is significantly different for a OHC vs. a pushrod engine, that should give us a really good clue as to which way the Z06/ZR1/whatever C8 models will go.
As far as driveability goes, I really, REALLY, hope that they don't sacrifice low end torque; that's where we live from day to day. I've driven an S2000 before, and the wait to get into the powerband just numbed the brain.
So, hang on to your allocation; you may get a lot clearer picture in January.
Have a good one,
Mike
It's already been announced that the C8.R uses a DOHC.