Should the ZO6 really go Flat Plane Crank?
#22
Instructor
I don't care what they decide on...
based on my experience in my 19 zo6...
this car will eventually be a world beater...
and I'm gonna buy one...
and guessing tons and tons of mid engine folks and usa proud folks will too...
buckle up and congratulations to chevy for having the ***** to build it.
based on my experience in my 19 zo6...
this car will eventually be a world beater...
and I'm gonna buy one...
and guessing tons and tons of mid engine folks and usa proud folks will too...
buckle up and congratulations to chevy for having the ***** to build it.
#25
Instructor
600 HP is a believable number. Im going to guess if thats the number we get then they have managed to take some weight off the car. No way it will only be 600hp and weigh 200 pounds more then the base car that just doesn't make any since. This car will be faster then the 650hp c7 z06 just wait and see.
#26
Safety Car
600 HP is a believable number. Im going to guess if thats the number we get then they have managed to take some weight off the car. No way it will only be 600hp and weigh 200 pounds more then the base car that just doesn't make any since. This car will be faster then the 650hp c7 z06 just wait and see.
#27
Drifting
Engineering a lightweight platform hasn't happened since the days of Dave Hill - if the intent is a 600hp N/A motor, IMO the weight needs to come in at sub 3250, which I don't see happening, not even close.
#28
Personally I think the FPC is something of a gimmick on the street at this point. Revs can be generated without it using DOHC's and generally the harmonics of FPC setups don't tend to help long term longevity of engines. Ferrari's rarely make 100,000 miles without and engine rebuild. Hell, I'd bet less than 10% of FPC engines see more than 60,000 miles during their lifespan. If you buying a car to race that spends a great deal of time on the trailer it doesn't really matter. Likewise a street car that seeing largely low rpm usage also likely sees less failures.
I'd say that Ford's recent experiences with failed FPC engines is worth considering. I actually did consider cashing in on my C8's value to move to a C8Z, but I'm happy with my car and honestly there's almost no instance where even the base car's full potential can be seen on the street so it's really a moot point for me.
I'd say that Ford's recent experiences with failed FPC engines is worth considering. I actually did consider cashing in on my C8's value to move to a C8Z, but I'm happy with my car and honestly there's almost no instance where even the base car's full potential can be seen on the street so it's really a moot point for me.
#30
Le Mans Master
#31
Le Mans Master
#33
#34
c8 Z51: 3650 lbs, 500 hp
c7 Z06: 3550 lbs, 650 hp
With full tanks of gas.
On a race track there's quite a bit between the two.
I expect the c8 Z06 to have 680 hp and weight 3750 lbs.
Last edited by BrunoTheMellow; 08-19-2020 at 09:03 AM.
The following users liked this post:
thrilled (09-15-2020)
#35
Drifting
One of the benefits of a FPC V8 is even exhaust pulses on each cylinder bank. This enables faster and more efficient turbo spool and twin scroll turbos. And with turbos the displacement can be kept low enough to minimize NVH.
#36
Le Mans Master
#38
Le Mans Master
#39
Le Mans Master
Have a good one,
Mike
#40
Le Mans Master
Well, you and I are in agreement that a FPC isn't really desirable for a street application. Heck, I'm an old pushrod guy (still think it's a better package for the street than a OHC), but I'll accede to TPTB on that change. At least reliability should be on a par with a cam-in-block (hate the OHV label, like an OHC doesn't have overhead valves) configuration.
Have a good one,
Mike
Have a good one,
Mike
The following users liked this post:
RussM05 (10-05-2020)