When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Not normal, but it can happen if you unplug sensors with the battery still hooked up. My first step would be to check & clear the code, especially if it came on immediately. Press your blue OnStar button and they can read you the code, otherwise just run to Autozone or simlar and have them scan it. You can reset it with a scan tool or by unhooking the battery. If it comes back, then it is likely you either left something unhooked or the larger TB is not playing nice. The factory 87mm TB ported to 91mm eff. is my personal recommendation for the vast majority of C8 builds as you're not really gaining any additional airflow with the 95mm but are losing velocity and resolution.
Not normal, but it can happen if you unplug sensors with the battery still hooked up. My first step would be to check & clear the code, especially if it came on immediately. Press your blue OnStar button and they can read you the code, otherwise just run to Autozone or simlar and have them scan it. You can reset it with a scan tool or by unhooking the battery. If it comes back, then it is likely you either left something unhooked or the larger TB is not playing nice. The factory 87mm TB ported to 91mm eff. is my personal recommendation for the vast majority of C8 builds as you're not really gaining any additional airflow with the 95mm but are losing velocity and resolution.
Stock headers/cats? Makes me think you have a leak in the system somewhere. I'd check the connections and gaskets between the intake/TB, TB/IM, & IM/heads.
Stock headers/cats? Makes me think you have a leak in the system somewhere. I'd check the connections and gaskets between the intake/TB, TB/IM, & IM/heads.
Yes stock headers and cats. I went back and retorqued the I take bolts. They had some play. So far no CEL.
Yes stock headers and cats. I went back and retorqued the I take bolts. They had some play. So far no CEL.
Did you use Loctite on them? I didn't on my C7 and they were continually coming loose and required periodic retorquing. I used it on my C8 bolts as recommended in the service manual.
Did you use Loctite on them? I didn't on my C7 and they were continually coming loose and required periodic retorquing. I used it on my C8 bolts as recommended in the service manual.
agreed, make sure you use the correct tq pattern and tq to 89 inch pounds. As mentioned use blue locktite and retorque after a couple times after some heat cycles. Should be good.
Kracka, been debating going back to 91 as you mentioned. I put the Lingenfelter intake with 95mm tb on and it had some higher rpm gains however its been determined the stock manifold flows very well. I had to take everything off and go back to stock due to engine issues, dealer taking my engine out next week to put new cam phasers in, ugh. Once I get it back I need to determine if I just throw the soler 91mm tb back on or put the 95mm LF system back on. I could sell it but it also looks nice but didn't get a lot of extra performance for the cost, that's for sure
How about splitting the difference and porting the stock LT2 intake manifold to pair with your Soler 91? You are right on the Lingenfelter looking amazing though! But heck, sell that and with the $$$ get your factory manifold ported and maybe add a set of headers?
Been considering it partner, then I gotta buy another engine cover as I sold my old one. Not sure what I could get for that LF manifold and tb used. Curious what that 95 is doing vs 91 velocity wise as you mentioned.
Been considering it partner, then I gotta buy another engine cover as I sold my old one. Not sure what I could get for that LF manifold and tb used. Curious what that 95 is doing vs 91 velocity wise as you mentioned.
87mm:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 15159.07
Air velocity (ft/s): 252.65
91mm eff.:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 13,855.69
Air velocity (ft/s): 230.93
95mm:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 12713.47
Air velocity (ft/s): 211.89
100mm eff.:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 11,473.91
Air velocity (ft/s): 191.23
I used 970 cfm since that is what the OEM LT2 87mm TB is rated at.
87mm:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 15159.07
Air velocity (ft/s): 252.65
91mm eff.:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 13,855.69
Air velocity (ft/s): 230.93
95mm:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 12713.47
Air velocity (ft/s): 211.89
100mm eff.:
Air flow (cfm): 970
Air velocity (ft/min): 11,473.91
Air velocity (ft/s): 191.23
I used 970 cfm since that is what the OEM LT2 87mm TB is rated at.
Interesting man, you speak my language LOL. I can see that velocity dropping, interestingly enough the LF has velocity stacks built into it, I had to take it apart as I was curious. I wonder if those bring back some of the lost velocity mentioned, I just know I felt a difference going to a 91mm tb and didnt feel much going to the LF w/ the 95. Maybe a bit more on top end but hard to say.
Looks like I can get my stock manifold ported for about $400, curious if that and a 91 would be better than the LF and the 95. Likely so small its negligible either way, then got thinking about the 91 bolted to the LF manifold. Its a nice looking set up for sure....in hindsight I would not have gotten it tho knowing what a small difference over the 91 it made.
Is this the 87mm ported to 91mm or just a 91mm TB for the. LT2?
Its ported. Also Kracka, from Solers website here are the figures on the 91 and 95 tb's so although there is less velocity, there is more air moving thru so interesting concepts to consider. Also apologize to OP for totally hijacking his thread here bet appreciate him bringing us all together lol. PERFORMANCE:
91 • Wide-open throttle flow: 1165 +/- 20 SCFM @ 20.4” of water vacuum [20% increase over OEM (970 SCFM) 95MM 1350 SCFM @ 20” H2O at WOT
Its ported. Also Kracka, from Solers website here are the figures on the 91 and 95 tb's so although there is less velocity, there is more air moving thru so interesting concepts to consider. Also apologize to OP for totally hijacking his thread here bet appreciate him bringing us all together lol. PERFORMANCE:
91 • Wide-open throttle flow: 1165 +/- 20 SCFM @ 20.4” of water vacuum [20% increase over OEM (970 SCFM) 95MM 1350 SCFM @ 20” H2O at WOT
Going big is not always better. I agree with you on that point. I can remember Matt c8 when he went from the 91mm eff and switched to the 95mm ported
His c8 appeared to run slower .....never got a faster time than his 10.93 and wasn't even close to it. That really woke me up towards my final decision....87mm ported to the 91mm.
thanks! So you're running a 91mm tb? Did you do tb and porting at same time? Just curious if you could feel a difference from just the porting as the lt2 manifold is supposed to flow pretty well. I definitely felt a difference going to the 91mm tb over stock. You guys are making me think lol, may go ported intake and back to 91mm tb and sell the LF system.
thanks! So you're running a 91mm tb? Did you do tb and porting at same time? Just curious if you could feel a difference from just the porting as the lt2 manifold is supposed to flow pretty well. I definitely felt a difference going to the 91mm tb over stock. You guys are making me think lol, may go ported intake and back to 91mm tb and sell the LF system.
Correct, I have the Soler ported 91 eff. TB and SoCal Porting ported LT2 manifold. I installed the pair at the same time so I can't speak to one vs. the other, but together it was a nice improvement. A gen6 Camaro shop did some LT1 vs. LT2 intake manifold testing and the stock LT2 outperformed the ported LT1, and porting on the LT2 picked up an additional 3whp. I'll see if I can go find those results again.