Odometer/Speedometer measurements?
Different sized front tire should not affect the speedometer and odometer readings, but could potentially result in a discrepancy between the expected wheel speed and the vehicle speed. No one has reported any issue with that. It boggles the mind. But say the rear tires have not been changed, but the front tires are larger. Then the for a give speed (which is determined correctly by the rear tire which have not been change yet), the front tires will appear to turn slower than expected. But now, make the rear tires larger too. Now for a give vehicle speed as calculated from shaft speed, the car is actually going faster than expected. But now the front tires are spinning a little faster too, so it might be a wash when all the tires are increased in size proportionally.
As for actual vehicle miles - thats another interesting question. Yes with larger tires the vehicle will have traveled further than calculated when based on the engine RPMs. But as far as all the internal shafts, gears, every mechanical part, they "traveled" the same distance. As in your example, if the car reads 10000 miles, but the distance it went because the tire circumference was larger was actually 10480, all of the internals still went 10000 mile (though at maybe a higher load). Does that make the mileage inaccurate? Does it affect the maintenance intervals? I do not know.
Now, I mentioned there are other speed sensors in the car. There are a some internal to the transmission and the output shaft - probably more that I overlooked. But regardless, the speed of the car is going to be calculated based on an assumption about the circumference of the rear tires. The larger tire will cause the car to go further than calculated, and its actual speed will be higher than the speed on the speedometer.
Or take it to drag strip and run a quarter mile. lol
This jives with what Andybump posted. Side note regarding ratios. The "ratios" front to back are within 1% of the stock ratios, meaning the size upscale ratio front/back from stock to my setup is less than 1% and the difference in size front to back is also within 1% of the stock size.
I can't find a single instance of anyone having an issue with the car with larger wheels/tires, but it seems like 98% of folks with 20"/21" setups have the lower profile tires to match the stock size. As I stated previously the car runs absolutely flawless, has never hiccupped ever, never thrown a DTC, zero rubbing and looks great with the bigger wheels/tires. Am I the only one that has this setup? There are LOTS of FE1 cars out there, I can't imagine it's just me?
Thanks again, this is why I subscribe to this forum!
Last edited by Semifighter18; Dec 20, 2023 at 08:14 PM.
This jives with what Andybump posted. Side note regarding ratios. The "ratios" front to back are within 1% of the stock ratios, meaning the size upscale ratio front/back from stock to my setup is less than 1% and the difference in size front to back is also within 1% of the stock size.
I can't find a single instance of anyone having an issue with the car with larger wheels/tires, but it seems like 98% of folks with 20"/21" setups have the lower profile tires to match the stock size. As I stated previously the car runs absolutely flawless, has never hiccupped ever, never thrown a DTC, zero rubbing and looks great with the bigger wheels/tires. Am I the only one that has this setup? There are LOTS of FE1 cars out there, I can't imagine it's just me?
Thanks again, this is why I subscribe to this forum!
If the tires are changed to 20 front and 21 rear, the actual difference between front and rear rpm is 21/20=1.05. This amounts to an "error" of less than 0.25 percent with respect to the expected rpm. that is (.00263/1.053)x100%= 0.25%. Pretty small, and apparently not enough to trigger a DTC. And no-one has ever reported an issue with that. And, you are right, if a different profile is used, the circumferences themselves change and the difference might be near 0. I think you can find the actual circumference for most tires. Sometime expressed as rotations per mile. So you don't need to guess about that.
If the tires are changed to 20 front and 21 rear, the actual difference between front and rear rpm is 21/20=1.05. This amounts to an "error" of less than 0.25 percent with respect to the expected rpm. that is (.00263/1.053)x100%= 0.25%. Pretty small, and apparently not enough to trigger a DTC. And no-one has ever reported an issue with that. And, you are right, if a different profile is used, the circumferences themselves change and the difference might be near 0. I think you can find the actual circumference for most tires. Sometime expressed as rotations per mile. So you don't need to guess about that.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
















