Launch Control - Skipped 2nd gear?!?
For whatever reason, it went through 1st, shifted to 2nd, then immediately shifted to 3rd. See attached video.
Any ideas why it would shift into 3rd like this?
For whatever reason, it went through 1st, shifted to 2nd, then immediately shifted to 3rd. See attached video.
Any ideas why it would shift into 3rd like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oRdZ4pLkY
For whatever reason, it went through 1st, shifted to 2nd, then immediately shifted to 3rd. See attached video.
Any ideas why it would shift into 3rd like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1oRdZ4pLkY
This is what the former Chief Corvette Engineer (Josh Holder's current position) said around the C8 Launch, just before he and half the Corvette engineers were assigned to work on EVs in ~2020:
- A very interesting comment was made by GM’s Chief Corvette Engineer, Ed Piatek: “We found that during very aggressive launches we can drive torque through both shafts/clutches simultaneously which improves the 0 to 60 times.”
- Road and Track interpretation of that statement was: "With the C8's Performance Launch mode, the car will actually use the inertia of the engine coming down between revs to propel the car forward. Chevy calls these "Boosted Shifts," and they're only used with a Performance Launch."
- Recent comments from @RedLS6 clarified how that is done. I mentioned in a post must only be for a few milliseconds. He said he had info on other DCT's that do about the same. They can slip both clutches for 100 milliseconds! Thats 0.1 second and a lot with ~400 hp!
Last edited by JerryU; Feb 4, 2026 at 03:29 PM.
In the video, you can clearly see my foot is 100% on the brake, and then I quickly stab the throttle to 100% WOT, and the RPMs jump up to 3500 and hold there until I release the brake pedal.
If launch mode wasn't engaged, then the RPMs would not have climbed to 3500 and held there. I believe without launch, the RPMs stay around the 1500 - 2000 range, correct?
1st gear was exactly as I expect, with the system working to keep traction. It shifts to 2nd, then immediately shifts to 3rd. All while my foot was 100% on the throttle and launch mode engaged.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
In the video, you can clearly see my foot is 100% on the brake, and then I quickly stab the throttle to 100% WOT, and the RPMs jump up to 3500 and hold there until I release the brake pedal.
If launch mode wasn't engaged, then the RPMs would not have climbed to 3500 and held there. I believe without launch, the RPMs stay around the 1500 - 2000 range, correct?
1st gear was exactly as I expect, with the system working to keep traction. It shifts to 2nd, then immediately shifts to 3rd. All while my foot was 100% on the throttle and launch mode engaged.
Sorry, did not have those details BUT looking at the graph of the run did not look like what I experience. Expect with the slipping clutches 1st to 2nd might look different but 60 mph in 2nd is ~6600 rpm so should shift to 3rd but not until then!And I agree, before I reached 1500 miles I only made 0 to 60 test runs using the old slushbox automatic approach of foot hard on brake and as soon as I use WOT release brake. I don't recall it getting to even 2000 rpm. BUT I did get rear wheel spin. I was surprised. In fact 1st time it happened had a passenger and lifted quickly. After in in my 2.1 second GM # runs with heated tires heard no audible tire spin.
Try Again. I noticed a video at a drag strip where he got a 60 foot time on 1.57 seconds he bypassed the water and used Sport mode to do a short burnout. He said it mostly cleaned the tires. IMO it was so short there was no heat building. Then he used Track or Z-Mode to Launch. That was with street tires not slicks.
In fact that is where I developed my tires need to be heated (I have the ZER Option Summer tires.) That was March time frame. On the GM Test I was able to get 2.5 seconds (have to add ~0.4 seconds as GM subtracts drag strip roll out as most magazines do when the published 0 to 60 times.)
PS: Yep watched again several times and it was in 3rd at ~43/45 mph. If anything would expect the gear number might be delayed not shown sooner. Appears something happened in that 1st to 2nd shift where they slip both clutches. Wonder if it detects tire spin it jumps to 3rd.
Last edited by JerryU; Feb 4, 2026 at 03:59 PM.
I'm guessing I either inadvertently did hit the paddle, or the surface was loose enough where it somehow caused it to jump to 3rd; but if that were the case, I would have expected the RPMs to spike suddenly due to traction loss and that didn't happen (have to watch the video to see what the RPMs are doing).
I do like to short shift a lot when driving around normally. I'll accelerate aggressively with say 80% throttle, but I don't want to rap the RPMs out to ~6k or so when just driving through traffic, so I'll pull the paddle to short shift and leverage the low RPM torque
Maybe I subconsciously hit the paddle? I really don'tthink so, as I had someone in the car with me and we were both focused on seeing how the launch mode would do. I didn't even realize it skipped 2nd until I got home and reviewed the PDR video. At the time of the experience, I said something like "Hmm, TC is off but it seems stabilitrak still interfered as it seemed to bog down from 1st to 2nd". It was only when I got home and reviewed the PDR video that I noticed it shifted into 3rd right after engaging 2nd.
I'm guessing I either inadvertently did hit the paddle, or the surface was loose enough where it somehow caused it to jump to 3rd; but if that were the case, I would have expected the RPMs to spike suddenly due to traction loss and that didn't happen (have to watch the video to see what the RPMs are doing).
I do like to short shift a lot when driving around normally. I'll accelerate aggressively with say 80% throttle, but I don't want to rap the RPMs out to ~6k or so when just driving through traffic, so I'll pull the paddle to short shift and leverage the low RPM torque

Maybe I subconsciously hit the paddle? I really don'tthink so, as I had someone in the car with me and we were both focused on seeing how the launch mode would do. I didn't even realize it skipped 2nd until I got home and reviewed the PDR video. At the time of the experience, I said something like "Hmm, TC is off but it seems stabilitrak still interfered as it seemed to bog down from 1st to 2nd". It was only when I got home and reviewed the PDR video that I noticed it shifted into 3rd right after engaging 2nd.
When I have some time, I'll try it again in competitive driving mode, as well as in track mode (with PTM).
I'll bet the eRay's AWD setup makes for some FANTASTIC launches! The wife's AWD Durango (supercharged 5.7 Hemi) certainly jumps off the line without any wheel spin drama (maybe a little chirp, but that's it). For a 6k lb vehicle, it gets to 60 in 4.59 seconds now (6.2 seconds before I added the supercharger).
The eRay is officially rated at what, 2.5 seconds vs. the Stingray's 2.9 (or 2.8 depending on what spec you believe)? That's a significant difference for only 200 extra HP with an extra 200 - 300 lbs of weight. The AWD most certainly is providing some serious benefit here.
Stingray curb weight: 3535 - 3647
eRay curb weight: 3774 - 4000
When I have some time, I'll try it again in competitive driving mode, as well as in track mode (with PTM).
I'll bet the eRay's AWD setup makes for some FANTASTIC launches! The wife's AWD Durango (supercharged 5.7 Hemi) certainly jumps off the line without any wheel spin drama (maybe a little chirp, but that's it). For a 6k lb vehicle, it gets to 60 in 4.59 seconds now (6.2 seconds before I added the supercharger).
The eRay is officially rated at what, 2.5 seconds vs. the Stingray's 2.9 (or 2.8 depending on what spec you believe)? That's a significant difference for only 200 extra HP with an extra 200 - 300 lbs of weight. The AWD most certainly is providing some serious benefit here.
Stingray curb weight: 3535 - 3647
eRay curb weight: 3774 - 4000
I retired in 2000 (well semi, still have a part time Internet business) and bult what I had always thought about. A Big Block set back in a tubbed chassis mostly for acceleration. It's a 34 Sedan body to allow the set-back engine (and bucket seats) on a very rigid TCI 4 bar link rear suspicion chassis. Coilovers and disk brakes in all 4 corners. It has 53% of it's 3000 lb static weight on the rear 16.5 section width (420 metric) Mickey Thompson tires. With long tube headers and a Holley 850 double pumper It's about 525 hp with gobs of torque. The Launch with a 2600 rpm stall converter is super. BUT measured with my G-Tech Pro does not come close to the E-Ray! Tough to match the added FWD traction!
I retired in 2000 (well semi, still have a part time Internet business) and bult what I had always thought about. A Big Block set back in a tubbed chassis mostly for acceleration. It's a 34 Sedan body to allow the set-back engine (and bucket seats) on a very rigid TCI 4 bar link rear suspicion chassis. Coilovers and disk brakes in all 4 corners. It has 53% of it's 3000 lb static weight on the rear 16.5 section width (420 metric) Mickey Thompson tires. With long tube headers and a Holley 850 double pumper It's about 525 hp with gobs of torque. The Launch with a 2600 rpm stall converter is super. BUT measured with my G-Tech Pro does not come close to the E-Ray! Tough to match the added FWD traction!
I'm also wondering if I should have waited a bit longer to buy a C8, for eRay prices to come down a bit more as they age and ones with higher mileage come into the market LOL! Although I do love the driving experience of a RWD platform with power ...
Does the eRay have a drive mode which allows a rear bias, so you can do fishtails, donuts, drifting, etc ...? I saw the article about GM patenting active aero to develop a "drift" drive mode, and it made me wonder if the eRay and/or ZR1X might have some ability to disable the front drive line somehow?





















