When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Can anyone tell me at what point (below what et./above what mph?)you are required to run more than a 4point roll cage on an NHRA (Maple Grove) sanctioned track?
Also along the same lines, at what point must you run a racing harness instead of a factory seat belt?
I can't answer your questions (been a long-time since I read-through an NHRA Rule Book, but I believe you'll need a harness at either 11.99 or 11.49 ), but some of the guys on this Forum who build chassis may offer help:
Forum-member CFI-EFI is very knowledgeable about safety regs, and since 'da Grove is so-close to Division One HQ, I'd follow current NHRA rules to-the-letter.....
Your best-bet may be to contact Maple Grove directly, in-case any of their Track Rules superceed the current NHRA policy.
9.99 requires a full "cage", slower a "roll bar" will do.
9.99 also requires many other safety items, multi layer jacket & pants, trans sheild, SFI flexplate, ....... best to get a rule book and talk to your local tracks tech inspector.
The rule-book only mentions roll-bar or roll-cage. When talk about roll-bar, it's a 5 or 6-point and a roll-cage "must be designed in an attempt to protect the driver from any angle, 360 degrees."
For et's between 11.49 and 10.00 a roll bar is required. But, if you're running between 10.99 and 10.00 and faster than 135mph you must have a roll cage. And also if you are runnig 9.99 or quicker.
Qoute: "A quick release, 3-inch shoulder harness meeting SFI Spec 16.1 is mandatory in all cars in competition required by the rules to have a roll bar or a roll cage."
But, if you're running between 10.99 and 10.00 and faster than 135mph you must have a roll cage.
You can run in the 10s with a roll bar if you have not altered the firewall, floor, or body, from the firewall rearward (other than wheel tubs), and stay under 135 mph. Your "and", that I bold-ed, is "or" in the rule book.
Originally Posted by padrummer1
Can anyone tell me at what point (below what et./above what mph?)you are required to run more than a 4point roll cage on an NHRA (Maple Grove) sanctioned track?
A roll cage is a minimum of 8 points and includes a "halo" encircling the drivers head. NHRA does not recognize a 4 point roll bar. If you have an existing 4 point bar, it will be treated as though your car has no roll bar. A five point bar is the minimum for NHRA. And as stated above, any place a roll bar, or more, is required, a 5 point harness is also required.
I would talk to Carl on this one.1-858-451-8868
The problem is all tracks though they are NHRA,decide on what they want to call .
The vett usually falls under the convertable rule.I would count on 10.99
you need everything,the pop top or "T" top in the vett can be decided in eather direction.It might be a convertable or not depending on the track.
I consider the t top as a 11.49 car.
I installed an 8 point bar and was done with it.
I am a tech inspector and one of the motor cycle guy's is an inspector
and was giving me a hard time ,you cant inspect your own car.I fixed him ,I asked where is your wrist kill for the bike?
He said I don't need one .Wrong I threw the book at him and ended his night of racing .
Later we aproved each other vhls and nothing more has been said since.
The vett usually falls under the convertable rule.I would count on 10.99
you need everything,the pop top or "T" top in the vett can be decided in eather direction.It might be a convertable or not depending on the track.
Horse feathers! Not according to page 20 of the "2006 NHRA Rulebook". Under "Roll Bar", it says, "...in all cars (including T-tops) running...". The next part of the sentence deals with convertibles, and then finally, dune-buggy-type vehicles. It clearly indicates that T-top cars are coupes. I have raced at a variety of NHRA tracks. For years I have raced at the NHRA conducted, and tech inspected, NHRA Division Finals. I have never seen a Corvette coupe treated as a convertible. I HAVE seen convertibles, with removable hardtops treated as coups, however.
Originally Posted by padrummer1
I have a six-point right now so I should be fine. I dont expect the car to run any faster than 11.5, so I exempt from the halo bar and saftey clothing
Your 6 point bar is good to 10.00. Faster than 11.50 you will need the jacket and 5 point harness. The halo is a component of a roll CAGE, which you are nowhere near needing.
I have raced at a variety of NHRA tracks. For years I have raced at the NHRA conducted, and tech inspected, NHRA Division Finals.
I have never seen a Corvette coupe treated as a convertible. I HAVE seen convertibles, with removable hardtops treated as coups, however.
In the last few years, NHRA has (incorrectly ) revised their rules regarding needing a cage & jacket from ETs quicker-than 11.99, to quicker-than 11.49 (amongst other changes ), and other-than a very short stint in a dragster, 99% of my racing has been in a 12-second Z28 without a T-top, so I don't feel qualified to speak-out on roll-bars versus roll-cages:
having-said-that, in 26+ seasons of 'hanging-around' various drag-strips, I have NEVER seen T-top coupes (C3s, 2nd & 3rd generation F-bodies, etc. ) be classified as 'convertibles' by any NHRA Technical Staff, and agree that hard-top convertibles are classified as 'coupes' in the eyes of NHRA and IHRA.
I have NEVER seen T-top coupes (C3s, 2nd & 3rd generation F-bodies, etc. ) be classified as 'convertibles' by any NHRA Technical Staff, and agree that hard-top convertibles are classified as 'coupes' in the eyes of NHRA and IHRA.
There was a "scare" a few years back. It was rumored all over the place, including here, that NHRA was going to start treating T-top cars as convertibles. Lots of people had an "inside" with an NHRA official, and KNEW what was going to be the outcome. It was quite a fiasco. Everyone waited with baited breath for the rulebook to come out that December. Finally, in the end, it was worded, as it is today, which I quoted above, that T-top cars were the same as hardtop cars (coupes). If you were to search the archives, I'll bet you could find a number of threads on the subject. I can't believe that a self proclaimed tech inspector could be so ignorant of the rules and post something so far from the truth.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.