When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
NHRA does not factor for atmospheric conditions. They DO factor for physical altitude for tracks above 1600 feet. I have a list of the NHRA correction factors for their tracks over 1600 feet. My weather station will correct an ET based on DA, to a sea level DA.
NHRA does not factor for atmospheric conditions. They DO factor for physical altitude for tracks above 1600 feet. I have a list of the NHRA correction factors for their tracks over 1600 feet. My weather station will correct an ET based on DA, to a sea level DA.
RACE ON!!!
I thought so. I have the correction factors and was applying them to my runs at Vegas last weekend. I was hoping for a corrected 11 since my best run was a 12.475 @ 109 and change with a 4,900' DA. (According to the ASOS at McCarran Airport.)
But I'm pretty pleased anyhow. I had a 1.791 60' on that run and got through the 1/8 with a 7.979 @ 87.21. That's not a best-ever, but it's pretty good considering the contitions, I think.
By the way, we'd kill for a 4900' DA. We had great conditions, last night. The DAs were right a 6200'. I can usually pick up a half second at Vegas in the fall
Duke,
Where are you getting your numbers? Are mine out of date? I am taking mine from a National Dragster. They were effective, January 1st, 2002. S.I.R. is, indeed 3075'. NHRA lists the factor altitude as 3000'. My chart says the ET correction is .9727, and that the MPH factor is , 1.0262. Did you assume the 3100 foot correction altitude? My chart lists the various tracks and the altitude they are corrected from. Tucson was listed as 3000' along with the above numbers. I know the difference is slight. I'm not nit picking, but if my numbers are incorrect, I'd like to know.
Your info is later than mine, depending how old the information that site has. My digger says, effective, 1/1/02. *I* would have rounded to 3100', myself, but this listing shows the specific tracks, and the factored altitude. Sometimes there is no rhyme or reason to NHRA's methods. My track is physically at 4225', but we're factored at 4400. Thanks for your feedback.
It does not matter what the actual track alt is, or what the corr. alt is... if a record is set NHRA doesn't not use any factoring.. Thats why most records are set at E town, Reading Pa. Tx. wherever the actual track is physically low so it gets good barometer readings.
It does not matter what the actual track alt is, or what the corr. alt is... if a record is set NHRA doesn't not use any factoring.. Thats why most records are set at E town, Reading Pa. Tx. wherever the actual track is physically low so it gets good barometer readings.
I think that Houston Raceway Park, near Baytown (?) Tx, has an actual elevation of either 9', or 21', above sea level.
When the BIG BOYS run there in March/April, they'll always run fast, with a chance at setting the National ET/MPH Records.
Gainesville is physically 'low', but the reason they run so fast there (I'm told) is because the track is as flat as a pool-table...
CFI-EFI: Do you by chance know the corrected factor for the Track in Acton/Billings Montana: IMSP. ?
My NHRA correction factors table was printed, effective 1/1/02. That is before NHRA had a track in Montana. Consequently, it isn't listed. If you know the physical altitude, I can check to see if there IS a track listed with same or similar altitude.
JP, Glensgages,
NHRA DOES factor ETs in the Sportsman's classes, such as Stock and Super Stock, for record purposes. It is MY experience that the factor isn't as good as actually, being there. In 2000 the division 7 finals were at Sonoma, Sears Point, back then, altitude 35'. I had a "personal best of 15.52 at home before heading to the finals. That factors to a 14.68 at sea level. I had two 14.52's at Sonoma A full second better than my home "best" and a tenth and a half faster than the factored equivalent.
CFI-EFI:
Based-on an actual 14.52 at INFINEON, what would you have had-to run at your home track to be corrected to the 14.52, something like a 15-thirty?
The reverse correction factor for my track is 1.0573, if you ignore the insignificant 35' of Infineon. 14.52 X 1.0573 = 15.35. Your figuring is right there!
Now, I'm running low 14.50s at home, in DAs above 7000'. Not too bad if you consider I started out at 16.75, and I haven't gone inside my worn out, 160,000 mile, Crossfire engine. I can't wait to get to this year's finals at Bakersfield. 635'!