Drag Racing Results, Trap Speed, Reaction Time, Driving Technique, Tips for Running the Corvette in the ¼ & 1/8 mile, Events

Applying NHRA Correction Factors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 20, 2004 | 10:54 PM
  #1  
The Dude's Avatar
The Dude
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 10,258
Likes: 1
From: Calif.
Default Applying NHRA Correction Factors

Density altitude at the time of the run(s) or always track elevation?


[Modified by The Dude, 7:55 PM 5/20/2004]
Reply
Old May 21, 2004 | 08:56 AM
  #2  
REDGAR's Avatar
REDGAR
Team Owner
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 32,545
Likes: 2
From: Lithia FL
Cruise-In II & IV Veteran
CI VI Drag Champ!
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (The Dude)

Good question. I think it is actual altitude of the track
Reply
Old May 21, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #3  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (The Dude)

NHRA does not factor for atmospheric conditions. They DO factor for physical altitude for tracks above 1600 feet. I have a list of the NHRA correction factors for their tracks over 1600 feet. My weather station will correct an ET based on DA, to a sea level DA.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old May 21, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
The Dude's Avatar
The Dude
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 10,258
Likes: 1
From: Calif.
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (CFI-EFI)

NHRA does not factor for atmospheric conditions. They DO factor for physical altitude for tracks above 1600 feet. I have a list of the NHRA correction factors for their tracks over 1600 feet. My weather station will correct an ET based on DA, to a sea level DA.

RACE ON!!!
I thought so. I have the correction factors and was applying them to my runs at Vegas last weekend. I was hoping for a corrected 11 since my best run was a 12.475 @ 109 and change with a 4,900' DA. (According to the ASOS at McCarran Airport.)

But I'm pretty pleased anyhow. I had a 1.791 60' on that run and got through the 1/8 with a 7.979 @ 87.21. That's not a best-ever, but it's pretty good considering the contitions, I think.



[Modified by The Dude, 11:03 AM 5/21/2004]
Reply
Old May 22, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #5  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (The Dude)

"The Strip" is listed at 2100 feet. The ET correction factor is .9830. The MPH factor is 1.0165. That converts your numbers, as follows:

12.475 becomes 12.263 sea level.
109.00 becomes 110.80 sea level.
1.79 becomes 175.756 sea level.
7.979 becomes 7.843 sea level.
87.21 becomes 88.65 sea level.

By the way, we'd kill for a 4900' DA. We had great conditions, last night. The DAs were right a 6200'. I can usually pick up a half second at Vegas in the fall

RACE ON!!!.
Reply
Old May 23, 2004 | 10:49 PM
  #6  
AZGASSER's Avatar
AZGASSER
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 290
From: Central MO
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (CFI-EFI)

Do you have the correction for Southwestern International Raceway in Tucson, AZ. Altitude is over 3000'. I ran a 12.84 at 110.x mph Friday nite.
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 12:13 AM
  #7  
The Dude's Avatar
The Dude
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 10,258
Likes: 1
From: Calif.
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (AZGASSER)

SIR lists its elevation as 3,075 ft. According to the NHRA the correction factors for 3,100 feet are .9627 for ET and 1.0395 for MPH.

Your run was equivalent to a (12.84 x .9627 = 12.36) at (110 x 1.0395 = 114.345.)
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #8  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (The Dude)

Duke,
Where are you getting your numbers? Are mine out of date? I am taking mine from a National Dragster. They were effective, January 1st, 2002. S.I.R. is, indeed 3075'. NHRA lists the factor altitude as 3000'. My chart says the ET correction is .9727, and that the MPH factor is , 1.0262. Did you assume the 3100 foot correction altitude? My chart lists the various tracks and the altitude they are corrected from. Tucson was listed as 3000' along with the above numbers. I know the difference is slight. I'm not nit picking, but if my numbers are incorrect, I'd like to know.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 24, 2004 | 02:04 PM
  #9  
The Dude's Avatar
The Dude
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 10,258
Likes: 1
From: Calif.
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (CFI-EFI)

Got the factors here: http://www.prestage.com/Tech+Info/Drag+Racing/351.aspx

Granted, these numbers are from last year. Perhaps they've changed. If that's the case I'd default to the chart in "National Dragster."

I rounded up to 3,100 since the track itself lists its altitude as 3,075 ft. here: http://www.sirace.com/stats/SIRinfo.htm.

Maybe NHRA rounds down.



[Modified by The Dude, 11:07 AM 5/24/2004]
Reply
Old May 24, 2004 | 06:44 PM
  #10  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default Re: Applying NHRA Correction Factors (The Dude)

Your info is later than mine, depending how old the information that site has. My digger says, effective, 1/1/02. *I* would have rounded to 3100', myself, but this listing shows the specific tracks, and the factored altitude. Sometimes there is no rhyme or reason to NHRA's methods. My track is physically at 4225', but we're factored at 4400. Thanks for your feedback.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #11  
VETDRMS's Avatar
VETDRMS
Melting Slicks
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,025
Likes: 1
From: Billings MT
Default

CFI-EFI: Do you by chance know the corrected factor for the Track in Acton/Billings Montana: IMSP. ?

Was out on Saturday and the DA was 7400ft. Needless to say I ran a little slow, but still managed a 12.2 @ 112

Last edited by VETDRMS; Jul 12, 2004 at 07:57 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #12  
jpee's Avatar
jpee
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 13,298
Likes: 14
From: Somers NY
Default

It does not matter what the actual track alt is, or what the corr. alt is... if a record is set NHRA doesn't not use any factoring.. Thats why most records are set at E town, Reading Pa. Tx. wherever the actual track is physically low so it gets good barometer readings.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #13  
ricer's Avatar
ricer
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

Originally Posted by Red96Coupe
It does not matter what the actual track alt is, or what the corr. alt is... if a record is set NHRA doesn't not use any factoring.. Thats why most records are set at E town, Reading Pa. Tx. wherever the actual track is physically low so it gets good barometer readings.
I think that Houston Raceway Park, near Baytown (?) Tx, has an actual elevation of either 9', or 21', above sea level.
When the BIG BOYS run there in March/April, they'll always run fast, with a chance at setting the National ET/MPH Records.
Gainesville is physically 'low', but the reason they run so fast there (I'm told) is because the track is as flat as a pool-table...
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #14  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by VETDRMS
CFI-EFI: Do you by chance know the corrected factor for the Track in Acton/Billings Montana: IMSP. ?
My NHRA correction factors table was printed, effective 1/1/02. That is before NHRA had a track in Montana. Consequently, it isn't listed. If you know the physical altitude, I can check to see if there IS a track listed with same or similar altitude.

JP, Glensgages,
NHRA DOES factor ETs in the Sportsman's classes, such as Stock and Super Stock, for record purposes. It is MY experience that the factor isn't as good as actually, being there. In 2000 the division 7 finals were at Sonoma, Sears Point, back then, altitude 35'. I had a "personal best of 15.52 at home before heading to the finals. That factors to a 14.68 at sea level. I had two 14.52's at Sonoma A full second better than my home "best" and a tenth and a half faster than the factored equivalent.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 10:38 AM
  #15  
ricer's Avatar
ricer
Advanced
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default

CFI-EFI:
yeah, the factors only apply to NHRA Sportsman classes, and not the Professional, or even alcohol classes.
Sorry if I confused anyone.

Based-on an actual 14.52 at INFINEON, what would you have had-to run at your home track to be corrected to the 14.52, something like a 15-thirty?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #16  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by ricer
CFI-EFI:
Based-on an actual 14.52 at INFINEON, what would you have had-to run at your home track to be corrected to the 14.52, something like a 15-thirty?
The reverse correction factor for my track is 1.0573, if you ignore the insignificant 35' of Infineon. 14.52 X 1.0573 = 15.35. Your figuring is right there!

Now, I'm running low 14.50s at home, in DAs above 7000'. Not too bad if you consider I started out at 16.75, and I haven't gone inside my worn out, 160,000 mile, Crossfire engine. I can't wait to get to this year's finals at Bakersfield. 635'!

RACE ON!!!
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Applying NHRA Correction Factors





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:49 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 11:09:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE