5.7 VRS 6.0 Piston Rods
My SB406ci ballanced rotating assembly came with 6.0 piston rods. What are the differences/advantages/disadvantages of these vrs a 5.7 rod? Compression? stroke? what??? I did notice that there were many more piston choices and lower compression piston choices with the stock SB400 5.7 rod. All info appreciated....
Thanks
Eddie
http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htm
Eddie
My SB406ci ballanced rotating assembly came with 6.0 piston rods. What are the differences/advantages/disadvantages of these vrs a 5.7 rod? Compression? stroke? what??? I did notice that there were many more piston choices and lower compression piston choices with the stock SB400 5.7 rod. All info appreciated....
Thanks
Eddie
A stock 400 rod is 5.565 and going to the 6 inch rod will take friction out of the cylinders as there is less anglulatoin and on most 6 inch rod assemblys they can be internaly balanced not having to buy costly balancers and flywheels and on most pistons used with 6 inch rods require a spacer ring as Mahle pistons use a smaller and tighter ring package not requiring a spacer ring.
And the longer rod does not change the stroke any the crank determains the stroke and the longer tends to make the piston dwell at TDC longer then the short rods.
Any of the 383s we build we have always used the 6 inch rod and it seems to be better all the way around.
Hope I have been of some help to you. GOOD LUCK
Last edited by BLOCKMAN; Jan 13, 2006 at 12:38 PM.
RACE ON!!!


My SB406ci ballanced rotating assembly came with 6.0 piston rods. What are the differences/advantages/disadvantages of these vrs a 5.7 rod? Compression? stroke? what??? I did notice that there were many more piston choices and lower compression piston choices with the stock SB400 5.7 rod. All info appreciated....
Thanks
Eddie
Just my 2 cents here Ed but if u bought a balanced rotating set with 6" rods ur already better off than with the 5.7 and all the research has been done for u. U can read more and it won't hurt but it looks like ur already there.
I would prefer the longer rod in any engine. And all numbers crunching, parts search has been taken care of for u. I would worry more now on selecting a cam to match ur heads and c.r. or selecting heads to match ur cam and c.r..
1 thing longer rods do is increase the dwell time at TDC and can breath well enough for max mid-range torque with a little less overlap - allowing a wider LSA thats friendlier on the street. Longer rod engines also tolerate higher compression better with low octane fuels. And i still have an rag article on a sb Chevy combo with a 1.91 rod/stroke ratio making 11:1c.r. running on 83 octane. I don't expect u to try this with ur 406" using 6" rods but with 91 octane u should be able to run well over 10:1c.r. with aluminum heads. Quench hieght plays in here to so read over the nearby posts for that (covered well enough there).
Congrats on a bitch'n 406.
cardo0
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/showthread.php?t=106715
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The machined deck surface of the race prepped short block I bought two months ago was severly damaged (beyond repair) by Roadway Trucking Co durring shipment. I was refunded full purchase price + shipping, so I recently bought another standard bore 400 block. (picked it up this time
) It's going into the machine shop soon so I'm studying up on what I have, and what I'll need, for the kind of motor I want. More questions to come!!Eddie








