When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I originally was taking a look at a larger cam (240-248 @ .05 and .561 lift), but that would have meant using a higher CR (between 11 and 12/1) in order not to loose to much low end power/torque.
Yves
If you get that 240/248 cam ground on a narrower lobe separation angle you have a higher dynamic compression. I use a 244/248 on 109 sep angle, on a 10.4/1 355. sure it has a bit of a ratty idle but the mid range is awesome.
If you get that 240/248 cam ground on a narrower lobe separation angle you have a higher dynamic compression. I use a 244/248 on 109 sep angle, on a 10.4/1 355. sure it has a bit of a ratty idle but the mid range is awesome.
Maybe I will go with a custom cam. Like Gkull said something with faster opening rates and a higher lift to aid to end rpm.
I was thinking of a 278/288 at .0200 tappet and 246/256 at .050 with lca of 112,5° and lift in the range of .58-.60. The springs provide enough space to allow these lifts. I would still have a DCR about the same as I have now.
Aside from the induction system, I just want to say bravo for going big bore and short stroke. I rarely find anyone that wants to go small cubes anymore. Nothing wrong with big engines as that seems to be about all I do these days but I do like the higher RPM power with the short stroke.
You do need more camshaft and compression though to make this a screamer.
Aside from the induction system, I just want to say bravo for going big bore and short stroke. I rarely find anyone that wants to go small cubes anymore. Nothing wrong with big engines as that seems to be about all I do these days but I do like the higher RPM power with the short stroke.
You do need more camshaft and compression though to make this a screamer.
I agree, but there are some downsides to the added CR. At low rpm it would run around 7,88 DCR but at higher rpm, when cilinder filling increases the CR would go more and more to the static CR and even above. So with pump gas, much above 10,5/1 could mean detonation. If i would find out after i mill the heads, I can't go back anymore.
So last couple of days I started looking at a higher intensity cam. In the crane catalog only the race cams have high enough intensity, but the are all ground at a LCA of 106° which creates alott of overlap and thus bad performance on the low end. With the camfigures stated above, I would have the valve close at the same point as my current cam, create more lift and higher .050" numbers with a 112,5° centerline. Basically the engine would have the same low end power and vacuum/idle qualities, but would breathe to around 7500 rpm in my opinion.
I will see what Crane says and how much this cam is going to cost.
Well, I finally had Crane put out a price on the custom cam and I'm going this way. It has 063" lift and a lott more opening at 0.05" so I should get over 7000 easily. The opening and closing rates are a lott higher so maybe there is a bit more valvetrain wear.