Turbocharger?
Doing this is not an easy job.
You will need some exhuast manifolds, these need to accept the size of the turbo and where it will go (next to oil pan or over valve covers).
As far as running that turbo from the A4, why? After going through all the trouble to install it on the corvette, IMHO you should go all out and try to get the biggest turbo on there....... :)
http://www.geocities.com/jerrysturbovette/home.html
[Modified by bill mcdonald, 8:38 PM 10/31/2001]
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
:cheers:
Was doing some cruising around when I saw this post and those pics. Funny how the turbos Q's always come along.
Now I need to figure out how to get guido's PT-88 in a C4 engine compartment! :lol: :smash:
Callaway did it with some kind of pump specifically for the turbos.
A complete dry sump system is an excellent idea and it will provide a better system for the engine, too.
Another method is to buy a single stage belt driven dry sump type pump that only pumps the oil (actually oily foam) out of the turbos. This way you avoid the cost of the dry sump and keep your wet sump system, but still have something to pull the oil out of the turbos.
As for an exhaust system, the 80-82 Vettes used a factory stainless tubular exhaust header. Small diameter about 1.25" so the velocity of exhaust gases is fast and spools the turbos up fast. Might want to get them coated, but on the outside only, you don't want to risk some of the coating breaking loose and ruining a turbo.
Use a small starter and a remote oil filter and all but the giant turbos will fit between the oil pan and the frame rails.





Didn't Banks have a kit at one time for the C3? The turbos were hung high near the valve covers. The kit isn't in production anymore.
The other big problem with turbo is heat. A friend put a single T76 on his Z28. They had a tubualr front subframe to clear the down pipe. He had problems melting wiring harnesses, power sterring hoses etc. ;) The car ended up having just about everything heat shielded.
http://www.geocities.com/jerrysturbovette/home.html looks like a clean turbo install. Some 3rd gen f-bodies owners have done similiar installs.
[Modified by 93Polo, 12:22 AM 11/7/2001]
or maybe it is for cooling, I cant figure it out.
http://www.stropespeedshop.com/other_parts.htm http://www.stropespeedshop.com/proje...n_turbo_ii.htm
[Modified by bill mcdonald, 5:55 PM 11/7/2001]
that twin T-66 car actually made 200 HP at 4000 rpms! :D
The rules for how a supra operates change when you up the size of the turbos :D
Thats whats happens when you put huge turbos on small engines, it just takes more RPM/exhuast gasses to get them spooled up.
here is the twin T-66's dyno chart! http://www.supraforums.com/supravb/s...+wouldnt+spool
Now take the Single T-66 cars, they are a lot faster, but the trade off is the turbo spools up a bit later in the RPM bands (some call it lag), but it makes a lot more power when it finally spools up!
Now twin T-66's.... No way that car is running sequential! it would be pointless. Those Turbo's are too big too spool in low rpms!! espesially with 1.5 L driving each one.
It does not appear to spool up till about 6000 rpms! That is one narrow power curve. I bet it is fun to feel 400 to 700 hp in about 1000 rpms though.
That twin T-66 car if we are all talking about the one in the topic I posted made 718, still impressive (untuned)at 18 psi, yet I bet it lags like crazy!!!















