When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 406 with Edelbrock Performer RPM heads that I want to switch to AFR units; my current CR is 10.75:1 with the 70cc RPM heads.
If I use the 75cc AFRs, my CR will drop to 10.2:1
If I use the 65cc AFRs, my CR will rise to 11.33:1
I am not changing my cam yet, it is a Comp Xtreme Energy 274 with 230/236 duration and 487/490 lift and 110 LSA.....I will be changing to 1.6 rockers which should add 2-3 degrees duration and change the lift to 520/523.
The AFR techs say that using the 65cc heads with my cam and the 1.6 rockers and 94 Sunoco Gold will be fine at 11.33:1 CR, but I don't think I will have enough duration to bleed off enough cylinder pressure.....am I wrong?
I have a 406 with Edelbrock Performer RPM heads that I want to switch to AFR units; my current CR is 10.75:1 with the 70cc RPM heads.
If I use the 75cc AFRs, my CR will drop to 10.2:1
If I use the 65cc AFRs, my CR will rise to 11.33:1
I am not changing my cam yet, it is a Comp Xtreme Energy 274 with 230/236 duration and 487/490 lift and 110 LSA.....I will be changing to 1.6 rockers which should add 2-3 degrees duration and change the lift to 520/523.
The AFR techs say that using the 65cc heads with my cam and the 1.6 rockers and 94 Sunoco Gold will be fine at 11.33:1 CR, but I don't think I will have enough duration to bleed off enough cylinder pressure.....am I wrong?
We have built some 383's with 11:3 on compression and we used the Vortec heads which require less timing them most heads and never any problems with 93 pump gas.
You could retart your valve timing a coulple degrees which will lower you dynamic cylinder pressure.
I have a 406 with Edelbrock Performer RPM heads that I want to switch to AFR units; my current CR is 10.75:1 with the 70cc RPM heads.
If I use the 75cc AFRs, my CR will drop to 10.2:1
If I use the 65cc AFRs, my CR will rise to 11.33:1
I am not changing my cam yet, it is a Comp Xtreme Energy 274 with 230/236 duration and 487/490 lift and 110 LSA.....I will be changing to 1.6 rockers which should add 2-3 degrees duration and change the lift to 520/523.
The AFR techs say that using the 65cc heads with my cam and the 1.6 rockers and 94 Sunoco Gold will be fine at 11.33:1 CR, but I don't think I will have enough duration to bleed off enough cylinder pressure.....am I wrong?
California has 91 super unleaded. My 11.2 C/R with swaintech thermal coated pistons and a solid roller 232/240 was always on the verge of detonation. I jumped up to 236/242 with 1.65 intakes and 1.6 exhaust and never had a problem with ping.
IMO - you would get more power keeping your heads and installing a roller cam with 242/248
I ran 12.5 on pg, it's all in the tune for one thing, but also a big cam bleeds off compression kinda tricking the motor. Now I wouldn't try it again, by the time it was detuned it was lazy and was a turd so I just planned 175 mile trips with it. or alot of octane booster
Depends on where your altitude and gasoline quality in your area. I had a 383 sbc with 10.85:1 in missisippi and it ran great on pump gas. Then I drove the car to southern california. I had to take a lotta timing out just for this area. Cam was just too aggressive. Octane boost in every tank. Gas was good for about 2 weeks then it would detonate.
Well what are you looking for i assume its more power.Your setup doesnt sound to bad the cam is a little small though.If you want the afr heads so bad then get the 75cc and mill the heads a little and you'll have the exact compression you have now.I wuld not do anything over 11.1 and try and run 93 octane.I sure hope you have no n20 and are running 93-Kaboom.DOes afr offer a cnc option on those heads if they do i highly recommend you get it.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.