Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Internal Differences between 350 and 400?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 07:38 AM
  #1  
jdraughn's Avatar
jdraughn
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Utah County Utah
Default Internal Differences between 350 and 400?

I got a 400ci block and I have been talking to my machinist about what I am going to have done. I am a little confused by the differences between them though.

From what I understand, the bore is larger on a 400, and you can put 400ci cranks in a 350 to get a 383 (minus .030 over i take it).

Also, the 350 is internally balanced and the 400 is externally balanced.

I know I will need to drill steam holes in my heads for the 400 block, but as I am looking around online to get an idea of what is available and the prices, I am confused.

It appears as though I need an actual "400" crank, and the pistons will also be slightly larger.

I am trying to price the cheapest (but good quality) rotating assembly kit I can find. I don't care much for more power at the moment. I just want to get this car back on the road. As long as it produces the same power as the stock engine did, I will be happy.

I found: https://www.motorpartscentral.com/Pr...tModelId=14969

and: http://www.usaperform.com/rotating-a...lat-p-439.html

Was about to check out Summit Racing. Can anyone else recommend any place else to buy the internals to rebuild my 400? Is a rotating assembly the best way to go or should I piece it together myself so I can choose exactly what I am getting?

Thanks much.

(This is my a 1990 Coupe by the way)
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 03:08 PM
  #2  
danno85's Avatar
danno85
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 2
From: Austin TX
Default

The 350 is a 4.00" bore x 3.48" stroke.
The 400 is a 4.125" bore x 3.75" stroke and has large main journals in the block.

So yes, the pistons are larger by an eigth of an inch.

The main journals on the 400 block are larger by about .200", so when you are shopping for cranks and see them specify 400 mains that means it is for a 400 block, regardless of the stroke of the crankshaft. The only way to put a 400 crank into a 350 block then is to grind the mains down to the 350 main journal size, which is what was done back in the day before all of the aftermarket cranks were available.

The other option for the 400 block is to use main bearing spacers which allows running a crank with 350 style mains in the 400 block.

You will definitely need steam holes in your heads.

Also note that the 400 block is a left side (driver's side) dipstick and you will need an appropriate oil pan, and also be able to accomodate the dipstick on the left side with regard to header flanges, etc. I run a block with a left side dipstick and it's no issue, just need to be aware of it.

And if you're planning on running the 153 tooth flywheel, have your shop check to make sure the block has the appropriate starter mounting bolt holes. Some 400 blocks are drilled and tapped for all 3 and will accomodate both types of startes, some only have the 2 starter bolt holes which only accomodates the starter for the 168 tooth flywheel, in which case you swap starters, or flywheels (depending on what you're plans are) or have the other bolt hole drilled and tapped in the block.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 05:16 PM
  #3  
jdraughn's Avatar
jdraughn
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Utah County Utah
Default

thank you. You clarified a lot for me.

Originally Posted by danno85
The 350 is a 4.00" bore x 3.48" stroke.
The 400 is a 4.125" bore x 3.75" stroke and has large main journals in the block.

So yes, the pistons are larger by an eigth of an inch.

The main journals on the 400 block are larger by about .200", so when you are shopping for cranks and see them specify 400 mains that means it is for a 400 block, regardless of the stroke of the crankshaft. The only way to put a 400 crank into a 350 block then is to grind the mains down to the 350 main journal size, which is what was done back in the day before all of the aftermarket cranks were available.

The other option for the 400 block is to use main bearing spacers which allows running a crank with 350 style mains in the 400 block.

You will definitely need steam holes in your heads.

Also note that the 400 block is a left side (driver's side) dipstick and you will need an appropriate oil pan, and also be able to accomodate the dipstick on the left side with regard to header flanges, etc. I run a block with a left side dipstick and it's no issue, just need to be aware of it.

And if you're planning on running the 153 tooth flywheel, have your shop check to make sure the block has the appropriate starter mounting bolt holes. Some 400 blocks are drilled and tapped for all 3 and will accomodate both types of startes, some only have the 2 starter bolt holes which only accomodates the starter for the 168 tooth flywheel, in which case you swap starters, or flywheels (depending on what you're plans are) or have the other bolt hole drilled and tapped in the block.
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 06:58 PM
  #4  
danno85's Avatar
danno85
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 2
From: Austin TX
Default

Reply
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 08:54 AM
  #5  
jdraughn's Avatar
jdraughn
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Utah County Utah
Default

I am wondering. Would a 400ci engine even increase the power at all if I left the chip and everything else stock?

If these are my stock engine specs:
Compression Ratio 10.00:1
Horsepower 250 hp
Torque 350 lb-ft

Then my HP/TQ per square inch would be .71/1 and 1/1, so by adding a another 50 cubic inches, as long as intake, heads and exhaust could handle the extra flow requirement I would get:
Extra 35HP
Extra 50TQ
For a total of 285 HP/ 400LB TQ.

That sounds waaayyy to easy though. I assume to even get half that improvement I would need better heads, intake and exhaust.

I am also trying to figure out the highest compression ratio my engine could handle if I use premium. if gas cost an average of 4.00 a gallon, and it's an extra 20 cents a gallon for premium, thats about an average 5% increase in cost for the gas. If you get about 4% or 5% increase in HP per compression ratio increase (like going from 10to1 to 11to1), then as long as that extra power translates into the engine not having to work as hard to go the same speed, and you get a 5% increase in MPG, then you would think it would be worth it right?

And if for some reason I put regular 87 octane in, would the computer just change the timing to compensate, lowering my power output?

I don't see any reason to not go with a slightly higher compression ratio as long as the engine is computer controlled to eliminate any detonation.

Any thoughts on this?

Oh, and one more thing. Do you think that doing a DIY port job on my heads and intake would be enough to support the extra 50CI from my block and give me a real 35hp and 50tq increase?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 09:28 AM
  #6  
LD85's Avatar
LD85
Race Director
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,772
Likes: 17
From: Indianapolis IN
Default

If you have Aluminum heads you can boost the CR up to 10:75-1 or really even 11:0-1 but you need to pay attention to the quench when doing this.

A good quench would be @ .045 with stock parts, tighter is better but with stock parts you have to be careful with not revving into the mid 6500 range to be safe.

My deck is .005 down and i use an .039 gasket

You could do a DIY port and have the valves backcut, which is cheap to do.

Last edited by LD85; Feb 28, 2009 at 09:30 AM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Internal Differences between 350 and 400?





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE