When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Monty's, among others, made 650HP normally aspirated. This is a 427 cubic inch engine with 18 degree heads, but it is an SBC that fits in the normal SBC space.
500HP isn't too hard. You don't even have to get the exotic heads. Normal 23 degree aftermarket heads, roller cam, and 400+ cubic inches will do it and still have reasonable street manners.
To make 500 + hp out of a sbc and retain good street manners, you are going to need cubic inches. A 383 would probably be minimum, 400+ would be better. My 406 made 476 on the dyno with a mild 222 degree duration @ .050" roller cam. On an engine the size of mine, it idles better than the stock L-82 in my old 350. 500+ hp would be as simple as going to the next size up cam.
As mentioned before, you need good heads. Air Flow Research, Dart, Canfield, and Brodix all make good heads. I run AFR 210's.
Of course if you use nitrous, or forced induction, the sky is the limit. Even on smaller displacement engines. But they better be built for the intended application.
Very easy to make a dependable 400 horse 350 engine, then squirt a 100 shot of NOS. Best of both worlds, a very dependable sb with good hp and manners, then flip a switch and you're off and running. :yesnod:
Okay, help me out here guys. I am having a 406 built with the following parts:
Eagle forged 3.750" stroke crank; internal balance
Eagle forged 3-D H-beam 5.7" rods
Comp Cams camshaft of yet to be determined size
Clevite bearings
Speed Pro rings
Fluidampner balancer
SRP forged pistons to yield 10 3/4:1 CR
Edelbrock Performer RPM Air-Gap intake
Edelbrock Performer RPM heads; 70cc, straight plug
Crane 1.5 roller tip rockers
Comp Cam pushrods
Headman 1-5/8" ceramic coated hedders
Dynomax Super Turbo mufflers with 2-1/2" exhaust
Holley Street Avenger 770cfm carb
MSD pro billit distributor
MSD 6-AL
MSD Blaster 2 coil
MSD plug wires
Edelbrock Victor series water pump
Be Cool rad
Spal electric fan
all this is going into a 72 coupe, with a Turbo 400, with 3:55 rear gear. I am new to using Desktop Dyno, but when I plug it all in, I am getting around 400HP and 450TQ, depending on what cam I choose. I was hoping for closer to 500HP and 500TQ. What do I need to do to achieve these numbers, or am I doing somethin wrong? My block will be bored 0.30" over, and the cams I have been playing with are Extreme Energy 262,268,274. Opinions please? Even when I change my heads, to say AFR's, the numbers don't go where I want to see them. Help!
You have the parts for a nice "350". For 500 hp you will need more cam. If you go to a Hyd Rol and 1.6s 500 hp & 450 tq will be easy. Not having a DD I can't give the exact parts needed. I would guess 284+ on the cam. The larger engine will use the larger cam w/no problems. You might want to see about better heads for that much displacement. There are people on this forum that have more experience w/this combo. Also 3:55s w/o od is a lot of RPMs at cruising speed "3,000 @ 70 mph". JMHO.
I've used the XE284 and the XE274 cams among others. The XE284 was too ragged for me even with a 4 spd. and 3:70 gears. It is a bucking bronco at anything under 2500 rpm. You will need a 3000+ rpm stall converter for sure. The XE274 lowers it to about 1700 rpm before it makes your forhead sore from hitting the windshield frame :D. I like my XE274 but I will go with the 112-113 CL next time for a little better idle quality. 450 torque is a lot and torque afterall is what gets ya going. Don't get caught up in the HP war, it's for braggin' only. A 406 with those #'s will blow the tires off.
7t2vette, you are using all high quality parts. However, the Edelbrock heads will be too small and your engine will run out of breath by 5000 rpms. I too was worried about losing streetability with too big of heads and cam, but am very happy with my AFR 210's. I am even thinking of stepping up to a bigger cam or else 1.7 ratio rockers (I'm running 1.6 rockers now). My advice would be a roller cam in the 230 degree duration @ .050 lift.
Also, 1 5/8 headers will be too small for your 406. Move up to 1 3/4.
Hey Smith I see your from STL maybe we hook up sometime. Are you happy with your current power? It seems like you've got all the right parts to make 420+ at the wheels. The only thing that seems out of place is the Performer RPM, have you considered a taller single plane? Where have you been dynoing your car, I'd like watch sometime if at all possible. Sorry for all of the questions.
My 383 is similar spec except for the heads,i'm using heavily worked Brodix track 1,and 1.6 shaft roller rockers all with a mild cam....the point of my project was to have 400+rwtq from 2000rpm up......if you have never driven an engine with this much torque,you are in for a hell of a surprise,i suggest you just make up a hp figure and enjoy your ride.....for conveniece on the street,you might want to consider a holley,750 vac sec,much easier on the wallet......good luck....john :chevy
Thanks for the note. I would like to check out your car sometime.
I am using the Performer RPM because when I put the motor together Edelbrock did not make a Victor Jr. that would fit the vortec heads. The super Victor would not fit under the BB hood that I have on the car.
I will be pulling the motor for a freshing over the next 30 days and then I will be back at the dyno and the track.
Your right I didn't think about the different intake bolt patern. I'd love a modded 68-72, my dad has a '71 convertible auto with a 270/350. Not a hotrod but its a real looker, we keep it at kentucky lake. I just got my car back together today after replacing the water pump. I took it out for a test drive AND THE GAS PEDAL BROKE. Atleast it was still driveable but the car generally doesn't run for a week before something else breaks. The fan still doesn't work right either. It never ends.. :crazy:
Turbo Jet,
I can get your 406 with the Edelbrock heads to run at about 485Hp at 5500RPM by using a mechanical flat tappet cam. Torque is about 550Ft-Lbs with an 11" runner single-plane manifold without any taper angle in the runners and 750cfm carb. The cam I used in my simulation was a custom Reed Cam with TA280UL intake lobe at 109ILCA (280/248/0.566"), and T276UL exhaust lobe at 119ELCA (276/245/0.534"). I wouldn't use a converter stall speed below 2500RPM. I chose the cam specs for best times with the auto transmission. The horsepower is with open headers designed at www.headerdesign.com using a performance factor of 6 in the program.
7t2vette: I plugged your combo into DD and substituted an aggressive Hydraulic Roller cam (CompCamsXR282HR) and pretty much got your goal: 481 HP and 502 TQ. AFR 190 heads with the same cam run up to 506 HP and 513 TQ, and going all the way up to the AFR210 pops you up a few more to 515 HP and 522 TQ.
All that said, these HP peaks might come on a bit high for a 406, at 6000 RPM. What is the expected red line for this build? Where would you plan on shifting? You can build the 406 for prodigious bottom end torque at the expense of some high end HP - and really reduce the stresses. You might them want to use a dual plane manifold to go for even more low RPM power.
I agree...if stock (short) 400 rods are used.
However, I was assuming that 6 inch rods would be used, with a small base circle cam, to increase the rod/stroke ratio to 1.60. And then rpm's would be fine.
Still would suggest good forged rods, but not necessarily a forged crank.
A hydraulic roller cam would pick the rpm's right up to 6500, and depending on cam/compression/heads, could possibly even see 550 hp.
But you're right, he could build it cheap for much less, if he kept it a lower revving torque motor. It would be almost as quick, but would run out of breath down the track, compared to a more built 406.
Actually, I'm thinking about sticking my 406, built as a torquer, in a tow vehicle. Something cool, like a 30's Studebaker truck. Pearl white with white leather interior and nice flames...(Gotta stop, my woody's lifting my desk up).
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.