Cam Lobe Separation Spec...HELP!


Intake: Duration: 260*
Exhaust: Duration: 270*
________________________________________ _________________________
Specs at .050” tappet lift:
Intake: Duration: 209*
Exhaust: Duration: 217*
Intake:
Opens at: -5.5 ATDC
Closes at: 34.5 ABDC
Exhaust:
Opens at: 46.5 BBDC
Closes at: -9.5 BTDC
________________________________________ _________________________
Lobe Lift:
Intake: .330” x 1.5 rocker= .495”
Exhaust: .343” x 1.5 rocker= .515”
Lobe sep angle: 114* (I hope because I need to pass SMOG have a good idle too: Supercharged app)
[Modified by GRX, 3:22 PM 4/11/2003]
That's why simplified representations such as lobe center angle and duration and .050" lift that get thrown around here quite a bit don't mean much, particularly if you are comparing cams with similar numbers. The only way to understand a cam in detail and compare with others in detail is to do what you have done - get a detailed representation of the lift-crank angle relationship. Then take the first and second temporal derivatives to determine the velocity and acceleration profiles. In short - reverse engineer the cam, so you know exactly what you're dealing with. If you want to pay to have it analysed by a "cam doctor" you get a nice computer generated printout of the data.
Once you have the lift crank angle diagram, and if you understand your actual rocker geometry you can pick the actual timing points required to represent the cam accurately in a simulation program. Though these programs don't allow you to input the entire lift-crank angle diagram, if you can pick out the actual .006"/.006" valve lift points, the programs will provide reasonable representation of valve action, which is critical to achieving accurate simulation results. For an asymmetrical cam like the LT-1 cam, I also have a file for the .006"/.010" valve lift points to compensate for the fact that the simulation program assumes the lobe is symmetrical. The .006"/.006" file makes a bit more top end power at the expense of a bit of top end torque. Vice versa for the .006"/010" file, which is believe is closer to actual performance.
Duke
Intake: Duration: 209*
Exhaust: Duration: 217*
Intake:
Opens at: -5.5 ATDC
Closes at: 34.5 ABDC
Exhaust:
Opens at: 46.5 BBDC
Closes at: -9.5 BTDC
Lobe sep angle: 114*
The exhaust duration is 217*. This puts the centerline at 108.5*s past opening, or 62*s ABDC. (108.5 - 46.5 = 62.0)
Two points to remember, here. First: 62* ABDC is the same position as 118* BTDC. If you are at TDC, you go counterclockwise 118* to get to the exhaust centerline. Also from TDC you go 110*, clockwise to get to the intake centerline. 118* + 110* = 228* The second thing to remember is that because the cam travels at half crank speed the lobe centerline separation angles are measured in CAM degrees. 228 / 2 = 114. SWCDuke's engineering and lab work, notwithstanding, it appears that the specs on your cam card "add up".
By the way, those specs should produce respectable sniffer numbers. Good luck, and...
RACE ON!!!










