When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'll take a new LS1/LS5 over that motor in original form. We can take them for a 1000 mile drive from Minneapolis to Bowling Green and then drag race them at Beech Bend and see which motor is better.
i owned 2 Z-28 camaros new in 68 and 69. the 68 had a build up engine to where it would pull 8200 RPM thru the gears and pull 8000 in high gear with the 4:11 rear gear. :chevy
A 302, properly configured will make as much power as any other 4" bore displacement, but the problem is you have to rev it sky high to achieve that power, so valvetrain durability becomes an issue and requires lots of premium parts and very high valve spring force.
If you stroke a given 302 to 350 or 377 it will make about the same power, but at lower revs. Also, the average power across the range with longer strokes is much higher because of the greater torque, so you have a much more flexible engine. Unless your only interest is top speed, a longer stroke engine will always outperform a short stroke engine.
SB power is basically limited by volumetric efficiency, and for a given engine configuration (cam, heads, etc.) VE will plot nearly identically as a function of mean piston speed regardless of stroke, so peak power will be about the same at some piston speed, but revs will be a function of stroke, and the shorter the stroke the higher the revs.
Why not apply the same line of thinking to increased cubic inches?
A 400 with a 350 crank and 30/1000" overbore makes a high revving 377 with 55 more cubic inches.
A 502 with a 427/396 crank would make a high revving 454-ish big block... with even more cubic inches.
The cubes add area under the curve, and the geometry adds the high rpm.
These guys are right though, torque is actually real power. Horsepower is simply a product of torque and rpm.
Drive a 1969 Camaro Z28 with the 302, and then drive a 1973 455-SD Trans Am. I think you'll lean towards the Trans Am.
Revs are nice, but torque is king.
how about a 327 crank in a 400 block?? i've always wanted to build that. Biggish heads pretty wild cam and you could still have decent torqye, but you could make some serious power up high in teh rpm range. Put that in a nova with a 5 speed and 4.11 rear?? what doyou think, ]
p.s. this is pretty OT
I'll hopefully be able to let you know soon enough. I have a 400 block/327 crank engine on the stand in my garage right now. It has Victor Jr. heads and intake and a milder cam than I could have gone. All the simulations look pretty cool, and I hope it will be lots of fun with my four speed!