Engine Mods Outrageous Builds, High-Horsepower Modifications, strokers, and big cams for the Corvette

Cranking compression..Pros/Cons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 09:17 AM
  #1  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default Cranking compression..Pros/Cons

What are the Pros and Cons of having a high cranking compression? I have a 14.5 to 1 SBC NA motor.
I'm going to try and lower the compression by adding more duration to the cam and installing a thicker head gasket.
Does anyone have any experience with having 300+ psi readings?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 12:29 PM
  #2  
SG4206's Avatar
SG4206
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Pipe Creek TX
Default

I'm curious , why do you want to lower it? This is a 114 octane engine whether you leave it alone or drop it 1 point.

I've had 300 psi reading with 5 bumps ;on all the 13 -1 plus combos.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
DOCTOR J's Avatar
DOCTOR J
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 760
Likes: 1
From: Greenwich, CT
Default

In my experience it's important to consider the Dynamic CR limit rather than just the
Static CR.

There's a nifty tool here for the DCR calculation (along with some design discussion):

http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/


Most of the discussion seems to be taken from Dave Vizard, so I figure it has a fairly
solid experimental basis. It also matches with what I've been able to measure on a
limited number of cams in my SB.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

SG4206, many are telling me that the 300+ cylinder pressure is too high and should be more like 230-260psi.
Dr.J , thanks for the link. The DCR is what I'am concerned about. I'm in the process of installing a larger duration cam with a later closing intake valve.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #5  
Simmo's Avatar
Simmo
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 535
Likes: 1
From: Darwin, Australia NT
Default Do Not Install Thicker Head Gasket

It will create more problems than it solves. Keep quench as tight as practical for your application.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 12:38 AM
  #6  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

Simmo, please elaborate on what kind of problems.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 06:23 AM
  #7  
comp's Avatar
comp
Team Owner
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 88,393
Likes: 2
From: eville in
Default

power loss fore one
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #8  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

I would question just how much loss we are talking about here. My main concern is the very high cylinder pressure.

Last edited by wheelsup; Oct 23, 2004 at 08:46 AM.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-6

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 09:19 AM
  #9  
comp's Avatar
comp
Team Owner
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 88,393
Likes: 2
From: eville in
Default

you want and Need the quench as tight as is safe
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #10  
SG4206's Avatar
SG4206
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Pipe Creek TX
Default

I'm with Comp.
In Our all out drag race engines ,we bump the piston on the quench area of the head pretty da- hard.

Have you dynoed this yet?
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 11:36 AM
  #11  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

No dyno number yet, but the ET slip are what matters to me. ~670hp, but we fiqure we are ~30+ hp short with the old solid flat tappet cam.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #12  
SG4206's Avatar
SG4206
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Pipe Creek TX
Default

I would dyno the engine as is ; then lower compression and re- dyno. This is the only way to find out if your theory on the psi for this combination is correct.

The biggest mistake I see people make; is assuming what works on Mr. Go Fast engine ,will work on my combination too. The dyno is the best tool to compare combinations and standardize the results.

ET's only indicate how efficiently you put the power to the ground. MPH is how much power your combination is making.

Good luck with your new toy regardless.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 12:08 PM
  #13  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

To elaborate a bit on the quench comments. A close collision between the piston and the flat portion of the head creates turbulence in the combustion chamber which promotes a faster burn that suppresses detonation, and makes more power with less spark lead. This is the "quench area". "Chevrolet Power" recommends .035" -.040", minimum. Some people go tighter than that. The benefits of a tight quench area diminishes as the clearance increases. At about .060" all benefits are gone. If your piston to head clearance is already near .060", a thicker head gasket won't hurt much. If you DO have a good tight quench area, a thicker head gasket is likely to aggravate a detonation condition, through the loss of the benefits of quench, more that the decrease in compression ratio will help it.

RACE ON!!!

Last edited by CFI-EFI; Oct 23, 2004 at 12:12 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 01:08 PM
  #14  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

Dyno numbers would definitely be the way to handle this situation. I also meant to mention that looking at the MPH was an omportant factor for track testing. Thanks SG (Super Gas ????)
CFI, thanks for your input. I'm debating whether or not to installing the thinner head gaskets (.041) with the newly installed larger (duration) cam.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 04:10 PM
  #15  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

I put the heads back on with the same thickness gasket. Checked the cyl. pressure and it dropped from ~340 to 255 psi. I will break the new cam in with the other spring only. Then it's back to the track next weekend.
Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 07:32 PM
  #16  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by wheelsup
CFI, thanks for your input. I'm debating whether or not to installing the thinner head gaskets (.041) with the newly installed larger (duration) cam.
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought from your opening post, you were considering THICKER gaskets. How deep in the hole are the pistons (piston to deck)?

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2004 | 07:57 PM
  #17  
SG4206's Avatar
SG4206
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 510
Likes: 5
From: Pipe Creek TX
Default

With a zero deck , I would use the .041 gasket to minimize detonation. Like Comp and CFI has said ; too much total clearance promotes problems.

Yeh , SG4206 is my NHRA comp number. Like most of the door slammers in this class; we can run SC also. Actually my '82 is more consistent at 8.90 than 9.90 I just don't like being chased all the time ; but it does feel real good to take out the dragsters. If your a Super Pro racer with your vette ; you know what I mean.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Cranking compression..Pros/Cons

Old Oct 23, 2004 | 08:03 PM
  #18  
wheelsup's Avatar
wheelsup
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,299
Likes: 0
From: Beltsville Maryland
Default

CFI, you understood correctly. I WAS thinking of installing a thicker gasket, because it looked like the bigger cam was not bleeding off enough cyl. pressure with the original thin gasket. . It turned out that a lubicate used to retard cyl rust while the motor was apart was giving us a false reading with the new cam.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 12:48 PM
  #19  
mike 1985's Avatar
mike 1985
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 1
From: SouthBend IN
Default

Originally Posted by wheelsup
I put the heads back on with the same thickness gasket. Checked the cyl. pressure and it dropped from ~340 to 255 psi. I will break the new cam in with the other spring only. Then it's back to the track next weekend.
Thanks
would you share what the cam spec's were before and after to drop the cyl pressure ?

Mike
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #20  
Lt1er's Avatar
Lt1er
Drifting
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 1
From: Reno nevada
Default

SG4206 - I went to the Vegas NHRA just a few days ago and they had 200 entries in S/C. You get so tired of dragster after dragster.

Wheelups - Personaly from what I've seen in race motors they seem to shift over to Methanol with the very high compression motors like yours because the pressure wave of alki is less abusive to the bearings and the motors run so much cooler.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-1
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-2
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-4
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE