When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's only the next logical step in the ever sky-rocketing performance race these days. But it is a little sad to hear the classic architecture of the car might be changed forever :/
I hope they don't abandon rear wheel Vettes completely.
Even if they decide to go (rear) mid engine only, they definitely shouldn't get rid of rwd. Just look at how quick McLarens and the new Ferrari 488 are (both rwd and mid engine).
McLaren 650s/675 LT: 2.8 seconds
McLaren 570s: 2.9 seconds
Ferrari 488 GTB: 2.9-3.0 seconds
Originally Posted by ErikwithAK01
It's only the next logical step in the ever sky-rocketing performance race these days. But it is a little sad to hear the classic architecture of the car might be changed forever :/
I feel like they'll still offer a "base model" Corvette available in the classic architecture, but who besides GM knows.
Originally Posted by Red Racer
So just a 5 year run for the C7? That's interesting....
Interesting for sure. I find it hard to believe that it would only be a 5 year run since the car is selling pretty well. Not only that, but they released the Z06 in 2015 (or at least that was the first mode year it was available as) and the GS is upcoming in 2017 (late 2016 technically). I highly doubt they would announce another model above the Z06 in 2017 as a 2018 model. What more can they really do on the current platform?
The main benefit to going mid engine is the main weight is centralized, making for quicker turning response compared to have the weight on each end like today's Vettes.
This idea really seems to be getting "legs" huh? I suppose it's inevitable but a base price of $80K seemsTo put it out of reach of cheap pukes like me.
I can understand why GM might be looking at things like hybrids, electric drive etc. Everyone else seems to be doing the same thing.
Maybe by 2018 $80K won;t seem so expensive. There are C7s already pushing that threshold and beyond. I just hope that they don't try to build their own Ford GT or Acura NSX and priced accordingly.
Seems to me that at the higher price they may be leaving a huge Gap between the C8 and the Camaro. Does that portend a higher performance Camaro?
And to think how many Vette purists were upset with the Camaro taillights on the C7.
(they're gonna LOVE the Ferrari rear end on the C8 )
"They" had better. Chevrolet has "borrowed" so many styling cues from Ferrari over the years, including the 4 round taillights that there should be no complaints (well except for the early adopters of the C7 who might be a little bothered. Don't know, but I find it interesting that the later Camaros abandoned the "Camaro" taillights
God forbid that, given 2018 will mark the 60th anniversary of the '58 Corvette that they don't offer us an "Anniversary Edition" with chrome strips down the rear and "Tribute" ersatz louvers on the hood - which I guess would have to be on the rear window since it will be a mid-engined car.
I think you are onto something there with the 50th anniversary edition. Besides the chrome strip and the louvers I think they would need to add tacky vinyl stripes stating "50th Anniversary".
I think you are onto something there with the 50th anniversary edition. Besides the chrome strip and the louvers I think they would need to add tacky vinyl stripes stating "50th Anniversary".
Tacky vinyl stripes? Oh, you mean, "commemorative insignia" (made of high quality adhesive-backed polymer)
Cool era we live in although the E-Ray seems a bit silly but I guess the others are doing it. Surprised they didn't save i-Ray since most things these days have an "i".