When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
stock z06 cam and heads, forged flat top pistons and aftermarket rods
Procharger P1SC-1 (8 rib pulley) running 10lbs boost, with a (non-name brand) large single intercooler
70lb fast injectors and boost a pump
Methanol injection (running 50% meth/50% water
LG Long tubes with X-pipe and stock z06 titanium rear exhaust
3:90 gear set
I initially had the car dyno'ed at 498 hp/485 tq. After I added meth I had it redyno tuned and it is now reading 524.4 hp/512 Tq.
Do these numbers seem low to you guys--as I was honestly expecting around 600hp with 10lbs boost. I didn't know if I should be looking at seeing if there is a boost leak or some other problem or if these numbers seem OK for the components that I am using?
stock z06 cam and heads, forged flat top pistons and aftermarket rods
Procharger P1SC-1 (8 rib pulley) running 10lbs boost, with a (non-name brand) large single intercooler
70lb fast injectors and boost a pump
Methanol injection (running 50% meth/50% water
LG Long tubes with X-pipe and stock z06 titanium rear exhaust
3:90 gear set
I initially had the car dyno'ed at 498 hp/485 tq. After I added meth I had it redyno tuned and it is now reading 524.4 hp/512 Tq.
Do these numbers seem low to you guys--as I was honestly expecting around 600hp with 10lbs boost. I didn't know if I should be looking at seeing if there is a boost leak or some other problem or if these numbers seem OK for the components that I am using?
You are not that far off with 525. You mentioned a no-name IC. Is it a cheap or poorly constructed unit? Could be causing restriction.
You are not that far off with 525. You mentioned a no-name IC. Is it a cheap or poorly constructed unit? Could be causing restriction.
It looks to be a decent unit (from what I can tell), and the shop that initially did the install claimed that it was capable of supporting up to 1000hp. Since that time however, I have found multiple things that have caused me to doubt the credibility of the original shop that did the installation. I now also suspect that my intercooler was a budget chinese manufactured unit that was purchased on ebay? If my HP figures appear correct to most of you guys (who are more knowlegable) on the forum I will look into getting a D-1 head unit to attempt to up my H.P. (as I won't be able to go smaller on my existing pulley). If it seems substantially lower than what most would suspect, I will try to figure out where the bottle neck is.
On a side note, I was happy with the torque numbers (512.4).
stock z06 cam and heads, forged flat top pistons and aftermarket rods
Procharger P1SC-1 (8 rib pulley) running 10lbs boost, with a (non-name brand) large single intercooler
70lb fast injectors and boost a pump
Methanol injection (running 50% meth/50% water
LG Long tubes with X-pipe and stock z06 titanium rear exhaust
3:90 gear set
I initially had the car dyno'ed at 498 hp/485 tq. After I added meth I had it redyno tuned and it is now reading 524.4 hp/512 Tq.
Do these numbers seem low to you guys--as I was honestly expecting around 600hp with 10lbs boost. I didn't know if I should be looking at seeing if there is a boost leak or some other problem or if these numbers seem OK for the components that I am using?
The numbers seem about right considering all the variables here!
I take it you had the motor recently rebuilt (forged flat tops and after market rods) Compression ratio could be a bit lower or the heavier rotating assembly causing lower numbers.
Lower gear ratios will also yield lower HP numbers, Dyno pulls are done at a 1:1 ratio and this achieved in 4th gear with your stock 3.42s (so your 3.90s will bring down the numbers).
A D1SC @ 10lbs will move air more efficiently than a P1SC @10lbs = more HP. There have been a few articles about P1SC’s performance limitations @ 10lbs, mostly due to belt slippage.
The type of dyno is another factor. Depends on what you’re comparing your numbers to!
The numbers seem about right considering all the variables here!
I take it you had the motor recently rebuilt (forged flat tops and after market rods) Compression ratio could be a bit lower or the heavier rotating assembly causing lower numbers.
Lower gear ratios will also yield lower HP numbers, Dyno pulls are done at a 1:1 ratio and this achieved in 4th gear with your stock 3.42s (so your 3.90s will bring down the numbers).
A D1SC @ 10lbs will move air more efficiently than a P1SC @10lbs = more HP. There have been a few articles about P1SC’s performance limitations @ 10lbs, mostly due to belt slippage.
The type of dyno is another factor. Depends on what you’re comparing your numbers to!
the dyno was a dynojet. Yes, the motor was recently rebuilt. I think the compression ratio might be a little lower than stock (definately no higher). The shop that originally built the engine won't tell me the exact model of mahle piston that they used--only that it was a forged flat top. The guy that recently dyno tuned the car said that the crank compression seemed a little low at 165 - 170 psi? How much do you think the numbers are skewed due to the 3:90 gearing? What would the increase be with the original 3:42's?
On a P1 and your mods you are about in right spot. Some guy with a similar setup might have made more and some guy might make less. No car with the same setup makes the same numbers.
You really have a bolt and blower car. I know you have a forged bottom end but you arent taking advantage of it. 10lbs on a small blower, stock heads, stock cam.
Do some upgrades like a d1, heads, cam then you will make the power you want.
the dyno was a dynojet. Yes, the motor was recently rebuilt. I think the compression ratio might be a little lower than stock (definately no higher). The shop that originally built the engine won't tell me the exact model of mahle piston that they used--only that it was a forged flat top. The guy that recently dyno tuned the car said that the crank compression seemed a little low at 165 - 170 psi? How much do you think the numbers are skewed due to the 3:90 gearing? What would the increase be with the original 3:42's?
Your numbers seem a little low for a factory LS motor (but without knowing the piston’s cc and how far they sit in the hole) those numbers could be as good as it gets, but that means less risk of detonation and more room to grow on the boost.
The gear install could show you somewhere around 5-8 HP….they don’t actually cost you HP they just skew the numbers.
If the motor pulls hard, doesn’t use oil and gets decent MPG (considering driving habits) JUST go have fun with it and put a D1SC on it when you want more…..Chasing DYNO numbers is silly ....too many variables!!!
with 165-170 cranking psi - it sounds to me like you're rebuild is a low compression motor. With the same boost, you'll make less power than a stock compression (10.5:1) motor. However, you can run a lot more boost....so - pulley it down and crank up the boost.
with 165-170 cranking psi - it sounds to me like you're rebuild is a low compression motor. With the same boost, you'll make less power than a stock compression (10.5:1) motor. However, you can run a lot more boost....so - pulley it down and crank up the boost.
He but he is running a P1SC @10lbs already...A D1SC would be the better way to go.