Performance Results Dyno sheets, Timeslips, Track Records, Who has the Fastest C5 Corvette?

Ms3 vs. Whiplash II

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2011, 08:31 PM
  #1  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default Ms3 vs. Whiplash II

On my 02 z06 with stage 1 ls6 heads, tpis headers, ported fast 90 and a ms3 cam (238/242 603/609 on 112 lsa) made 468/416. Same setup with the whiplash II (high 240/low 250 630/630 on a 113 lsa) it made 469/404. I havent been to te track yet to see what it will run but I can tell you the whiplash seems to drive and idle a lot better. It was tuned by Brian at Reckart Performance Tuning RPT in Cedar Park TX. He did a great job and really took his time to get all the bugs worked out. Tuning was performed on his dynopack dyno.
Old 08-23-2011, 07:31 AM
  #2  
Fartpipe
Le Mans Master
 
Fartpipe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 8,994
Received 115 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

Interesting to see the graphs layed over each other to see if one has more low end torque/hp than the other. Either way thanks for sharing
Old 08-23-2011, 01:31 PM
  #3  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

The ms3 made more power and torque all the way up to around 6000 rpms. Thr whiplash feels like it pulls harder for some reason though.
Old 08-23-2011, 05:53 PM
  #4  
All_Motor_C5LS6
Drifting
 
All_Motor_C5LS6's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2010
Location: Katy TX
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nate B
The ms3 made more power and torque all the way up to around 6000 rpms. Thr whiplash feels like it pulls harder for some reason though.
It probably felt that way because the Whiplash wanted to keep revving.
Old 08-23-2011, 06:12 PM
  #5  
Chicago1
Race Director
 
Chicago1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Posts: 12,053
Received 321 Likes on 208 Posts

Default

Both are great cams from what I hear. Why only going to 6k?
Old 08-23-2011, 08:23 PM
  #6  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

^^^^The whiplash started to make more power over the ms3 above 6k. I pulled it up to 6500 and it was still climbing slightly.
Old 08-26-2011, 02:19 AM
  #7  
Silnus
Pro
 
Silnus's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I can't see the graph on this gov't computer but I'm gonna say that your old MS3 setup will give you better e.t's than the new one. New cam may feel like it is pulling harder than the other cam but sometimes it could be the seat of the pants bliss. Were both cams tuned by same guy? If not, the tune on the new cam could be more accuarate than the last. Why so big of a cam on a 346?
Old 09-03-2011, 05:50 PM
  #8  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Finally got the graph


Last edited by Nate B; 09-06-2011 at 01:43 PM.
Old 09-03-2011, 06:12 PM
  #9  
CTD
Melting Slicks
 
CTD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Sicamous BC
Posts: 2,396
Received 51 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

Same tuner & dyno? Sorry I cannot see the graph.
Old 09-03-2011, 08:17 PM
  #10  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CTD
Same tuner & dyno? Sorry I cannot see the graph.
Sure is
Old 09-03-2011, 08:41 PM
  #11  
CTD
Melting Slicks
 
CTD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Sicamous BC
Posts: 2,396
Received 51 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

I'm on a different computer......cannot see the graph. The results will be interesting!
Old 09-03-2011, 10:25 PM
  #12  
LSOHOLIC
Melting Slicks
 
LSOHOLIC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,536
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silnus
I can't see the graph on this gov't computer but I'm gonna say that your old MS3 setup will give you better e.t's than the new one. New cam may feel like it is pulling harder than the other cam but sometimes it could be the seat of the pants bliss. Were both cams tuned by same guy? If not, the tune on the new cam could be more accuarate than the last. Why so big of a cam on a 346?
Silnus is right...there have been a hand full of cam only f-bodys in the 10's with the MS3 and 9's with a little spray. Can't recall any England Green cams doing that...

Example...http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...NTERSTITIAL_15


Thanks......
Old 09-04-2011, 09:02 AM
  #13  
87gtNOS
Racer
 
87gtNOS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It seems most cams, ans even stock, make about 250 rwhp at roughly 3500 rpm...then the power goes up from there....

So this still leads me to wonder what the differences are below that? Are these big cams LESS power than stock below that?

I'd sure like an MS3....but....on the street with 3.42 gears (maybe 3.90)???
Old 09-04-2011, 02:58 PM
  #14  
soroZ
Racer
 
soroZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I'm interested in this thread too. How streetable is the MS3 for a weekend only driven car? what LSA would you recommend? MS3 is on the top of my list and I'm shopping for cams, so is the whiplashII. My main focus is to make power in the midrage from 4-7k rpm, don't mind a choppy idle but do mind car always turning off.
Old 09-04-2011, 09:42 PM
  #15  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

The ms3 is pretty streetable IMO. I had it on a 112lsa and had minor bucking at lower rpms. The whiplash feels a lot smoother and doesn't buck as bad as the ms3. They both pull hard above 3500rpms. The main reason I changed to the whiplash was my tuner had put them in a few vetts and was really impressed with how it drove. You don't really see many fbodies with the whiplash because they are to heavy and it doesn't make enough low end torque. I'm going to try and make it to the track here in the next week or two to see how it does. I know from a roll 50-140 I'm dead even with a 600whp 09 gt500 now and with the ms3 he would beat me every time. That was on a closed air strip
Old 09-05-2011, 12:28 AM
  #16  
LSOHOLIC
Melting Slicks
 
LSOHOLIC's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,536
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

In my opinion a roll race does not prove sh*t. And about the F-bodys, they typically are a couple 100lbs heavier but.....thats all relative to the combo. What are the intake ABDC points of each cam ?? That would be a starting point in gathering data between the two cams(as far as creating bottom end grunt).


Thanks....and the whole propriatary cam data is BS IMHO. Degree it in or throw it on a cam doctor and get your info.
Old 09-05-2011, 01:13 AM
  #17  
soroZ
Racer
 
soroZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nate B
The ms3 is pretty streetable IMO. I had it on a 112lsa and had minor bucking at lower rpms. The whiplash feels a lot smoother and doesn't buck as bad as the ms3. They both pull hard above 3500rpms. The main reason I changed to the whiplash was my tuner had put them in a few vetts and was really impressed with how it drove. You don't really see many fbodies with the whiplash because they are to heavy and it doesn't make enough low end torque. I'm going to try and make it to the track here in the next week or two to see how it does. I know from a roll 50-140 I'm dead even with a 600whp 09 gt500 now and with the ms3 he would beat me every time. That was on a closed air strip
As long as it doesnt make me hate driving the car, and doesnt stall every 2 seconds I'm good.

So ur saying the whiplash performs better from a roll than the ms3? I mainly want this car for street use from a roll, not exactly a track junky, which would u say performs better considering I will only be revving the car to 7k max. I am yet to see reviews on the whiplash or the prices on their cam kits either.

Get notified of new replies

To Ms3 vs. Whiplash II

Old 09-05-2011, 11:13 AM
  #18  
Nate B
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Nate B's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 892
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soroZ
As long as it doesnt make me hate driving the car, and doesnt stall every 2 seconds I'm good.

So ur saying the whiplash performs better from a roll than the ms3? I mainly want this car for street use from a roll, not exactly a track junky, which would u say performs better considering I will only be revving the car to 7k max. I am yet to see reviews on the whiplash or the prices on their cam kits either.
Both cams pull hard above 3500rpms but the whiplash "feels" a bit stronger. The whiplash being a bigger cam will pull all the way up to 7k where as the ms3 peaks at around 6500. I only pulled to to 6500 on the dyno and it prolly would have gained a few more ha I pulled it higher.

You can call England green to get prices or you can build your own package. You can piece it together for around 850 here.
http://www.shopreckartperformancetuning.com/England-Green-Whiplash-II-Camshaft_p_282.html
Old 09-05-2011, 12:58 PM
  #19  
87gtNOS
Racer
 
87gtNOS's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nate B
Finally got the graph

how about posting the graphs???
Old 09-05-2011, 02:03 PM
  #20  
soroZ
Racer
 
soroZ's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Nate B
Both cams pull hard above 3500rpms but the whiplash "feels" a bit stronger. The whiplash being a bigger cam will pull all the way up to 7k where as the ms3 peaks at around 6500. I only pulled to to 6500 on the dyno and it prolly would have gained a few more ha I pulled it higher.

You can call England green to get prices or you can build your own package. You can piece it together for around 850 here.
http://www.shopreckartperformancetun...aft_p_282.html
Yea another problem is that I can't find the pricing for the kit or the specs of the whiplash anywhere online.

So ur saying the whiplash is a bigger cam yet more streetable and provides more power in midrange and up top? what was the LSA on either of the cams that you got? BTW we can't see the dyno graphs, the link doesn't work.


Quick Reply: Ms3 vs. Whiplash II



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.