When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Is it even possible? I mean, could the dyno results be skewed somehow?
I never did a baseline on this car but it felt really strong stock when I bought it at 57K miles. I had a 2004 Z06 that felt weak compared to this 2002.
I think the reason for the high numbers (WHP and WTQ) are because of the "DIN" correction factor (they are higher than SAE). Have the dyno operator shoot you a dyno sheet with SAE correction. I have very similar mods as yours, and put down 386/372 SAE (which is actually a tad higher than average).
Last edited by 95rtturbo; Oct 15, 2012 at 02:35 PM.
I think the reason for the high numbers (WHP and WTQ) are because of the "DIN" correction factor (they are higher than SAE). Have the dyno operator shoot you a dyno sheet with SAE correction. I have very similar mods as yours, and put down 386/372 SAE (which is actually a tad higher than average).
I had no idea what DIN and SAE were. I just googled them and I see what you guys are saying. It looks like the DIN formula for correction is a bit more lenient than SAE.
I don' think the DIN CF will affect it that much. My car put down 360 RWHP SAE on a 97 degree day, and DIN was only 364. Unless Im thinking it through wrong, he'd need to have dyno'd on a 150 degree day for the CF to adjust to something that high, right?
If it were colder, it would correct to less power.
Looking at the sheet again, indeed it was 63 degrees, and the CF was .99 - not a larger multiplier.
I would either take it to the track to see if it backs up the numbers, or look at other items that could have been askew. I'm not too familiar with what could easily be adjusted on a dynojet to inflate numbers to that degree, if they are inflated. That torque figure does indeed look exceptionally high though -
To the dyno operators - what could cause it to be so much higher? Im thinking it must have a cam. Not having it strapped down as tight wouldn't result in that much of a skewed number, would it?
I laugh evertime I read threads like this because It always boggles me that people dont understand that all dyno's are different and this was obviously one of the most happy generous dyno's I have ever seen... Im just a CAI/Catback C5Z and I make 367/364, On that same dyno my Cam, Full exhaust, tuned 04 GTO makes 425/396... If you took your car with your mods and put it on the dyno I go to you would probably be in the 385 range... My GTO on the dyno you were on would probably read 500 RWHP hahahaha.... Dyno's are nothing more then a mod and tuning tool... Take it to the track and get some real world results man
So, other work must have been done to this car before I bought it. As I had stated above in a reply, the car sounded stock when I bought it but it definitely felt much stronger before any of the mods I did comparing it to a 2004 Z I owned previously.
I guess the only way to find out is the take it apart?
So, other work must have been done to this car before I bought it. As I had stated above in a reply, the car sounded stock when I bought it but it definitely felt much stronger before any of the mods I did comparing it to a 2004 Z I owned previously.
I guess the only way to find out is the take it apart?
A baby cam would explain the gains, you could try pulling the valve cover to see if you have aftermarket springs. You could see if someone can download the tune and compare it to a stock tune. Unless you really care, enjoy the car and move on.
A baby cam would explain the gains, you could try pulling the valve cover to see if you have aftermarket springs. You could see if someone can download the tune and compare it to a stock tune. Unless you really care, enjoy the car and move on.
The car was tuned after the exhaust and CAI were installed.
I laugh evertime I read threads like this because It always boggles me that people dont understand that all dyno's are different and this was obviously one of the most happy generous dyno's I have ever seen... Im just a CAI/Catback C5Z and I make 367/364, On that same dyno my Cam, Full exhaust, tuned 04 GTO makes 425/396... If you took your car with your mods and put it on the dyno I go to you would probably be in the 385 range... My GTO on the dyno you were on would probably read 500 RWHP hahahaha.... Dyno's are nothing more then a mod and tuning tool... Take it to the track and get some real world results man
I've seen so many people all excited at what there car put down on the dyno only to find out what it really makes on the track is nowhere near it.
The car was tuned after the exhaust and CAI were installed.
If the tuner were worth his salt, he should have been able to judge whether the maf readings were inline with other cars making an honest 425. Now, if his only comparison is to his dyno's 425, then he think they were right.
I havent been messing with LS1 specifically, but tuning in general, and one should be able to get a general idea to the amount of power based on g/s, or at least I'd think.
Ok, so what G/S airflow would equate to 425,450, 475 hp?
Mine hits between 360 and 370 g/sec and shows delivered torque of 430-440 ft lps in HPT
I've seen some estimates say its close to 1g/sec per hp, and others say to take g/sec and multiply time .8.
If you are hitting 370g/sec, that is anywhere between 370 and 460. Granted, thats a large range, but those are just generic numbers Im throwing out there.
I've seen many say that on a "properly scaled" maf, that it should be close to equal.
I'll see if I can find any specific LS related info about it.
Lots of factors with different dynos (mustang dyno, dynotech, etc) hood up, hood down, weather station, straps loose, straps tight, fan on or off the car? These items can make or loose 25-30rwhp.
You should have base lined first before mods and always go to the same dyno and ask for weather station results eash time... only gets worse when you change dyno and or tuners.
Check GMHTP they had a write up on this a few months back.
Always read the correction factor. SAE is the standard in the LS1 world. If you took your car to the track, you would MPH the same as any other c5z with those mods, unless of course there is a baby cam in that thing.