C6 Corvette General Discussion General C6 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Feral Industries

Tire size throwing C0040?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 09:40 PM
  #1  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default Tire size throwing C0040?

Do you think I'm throwing a C0040 RF wheel speed sensor due to different tire sizes front and back?
The reason I'm asking is because it only throws my AH/TC/ABS at approximately 70mph every key cycle! Under 70mph the car works as its supposed to.
I'm running factory size 285/35/19 firestones on the rear and BFgoodrich g force KDW up frOnt one size wider than factory 245/40/18.
I checked my wheel speed sensor plugs and harness an also replaced the front right wheel speed sensor and hub assembly.
I went ahead and ordered factory sized firestones for the front and I'll see what happens.

In the mean time... Who has some insight on what the h@$$ is going on?!!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 10:27 PM
  #2  
Kenny94945's Avatar
Kenny94945
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,501
Likes: 717
From: Sausalito CA
Default

Those pig tail harnesses are notorious.
Closely inspect the pins and add die-electric grease.

Steel brake lines also seem to cause this issue.

There are lots of threads and hunting for a cure for the problem you are having.

If both fronts are the same tire and the tire height is the same, I'd vote that a wider tire is not the issue.

Did the problem not exist until you changed tires?
Or has the problem occured just recently after many miles following the tire change?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 10:38 PM
  #3  
LMB-Z's Avatar
LMB-Z
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,642
Likes: 450
From: Texarkana Texas
Default

I don't think a difference in tire sizes will make your car throw codes. I put 325/30-19's on my 05 on stock rims and didn't throw any codes. You may have a bad sensor.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 10:40 PM
  #4  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

I bought the car two months ago and it had the issue. It had 295/35/19 BFG's on the back but they were slick So i put new firestones on. I will check the pig tails again when I do the new front tires.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 10:42 PM
  #5  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

I forgot to mention that I ran jumper harnesses across the front to eliminate the sensors out of the equation. I plugged in the RF sensor to the LF harness and vise versa. IT STILL THREW A RF CODE
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 10:43 PM
  #6  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

That points I the pig tail on the RF again doesn't it? ^^
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2012 | 10:44 PM
  #7  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

My question is, if it's not a bad sensor and not the tire size, why does it only happen at 70+mph?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 12:30 AM
  #8  
Wayne O's Avatar
Wayne O
CF Senior Member
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,313
Likes: 25
From: Tucson Arizona
Default

A wider front tire shouldn't matter.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 09:42 AM
  #9  
haljensen's Avatar
haljensen
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 10,399
Likes: 26
From: Austin Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Wayne O
A wider front tire shouldn't matter.
Yes, it could cause a problem. The wider tire is also taller unless you decrease aspect ratio on the wider tire. Could it be that the diameter difference isn't noticable to the computer until the car speed reaches 70 MPH?

A 275/35/18 is aprx. the same diameter as a 245/40/18.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 09:48 AM
  #10  
talon90's Avatar
talon90
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,617
Likes: 167
Tech Contributor
Cruise-In 11 Veteran
NCM Ambassador
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'10
Default

Can you list what size you are currently using on the front. The size you listed in your original post is the OEM size. As noted it is possible for this code to be associated with a wheel or tire change if you don't come close to maintaining the OEM stagger and rolling diameter differences.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 09:55 AM
  #11  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

255/40/18 front currently


And 285/35/19 rear
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 10:02 AM
  #12  
wolfdogs's Avatar
wolfdogs
Le Mans Master
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 8
From: Stafford VA, home of our wolf den. No house break ins to date.
Default

Originally Posted by GM Power4Life
255/40/18 front currently


And 285/35/19 rear
that front tire is only .31" taller than stock, and the diff in rolling diameter between front and back is only .15"........ i don't think thats your code prob.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 10:19 AM
  #13  
talon90's Avatar
talon90
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 35,617
Likes: 167
Tech Contributor
Cruise-In 11 Veteran
NCM Ambassador
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'10
Default

Originally Posted by GM Power4Life
255/40/18 front currently


And 285/35/19 rear
Wolfdogs, I'm getting different numbers than you are. I'm showing a difference in diameter of .9" front to rear and a tire to tire difference of .300"

The OEM stagger is 1.2" with your new size tire you have dropped that to .9" (generally right around 1.1" wouldn't cause the problem). My recollection is that the EBCM has an allowance of 5% to accomodate tire wear. In making the change you have also changed the revolutions per mile. Above 70+ may be the sweet spot to aggrivate the wheel speed sensor calculations. Under normal circumstances with stock tires, your front tire would rotate 33 more revolutions than the rear in a mile. With your new size it is only rotating 24 times in that same mile.

Last edited by talon90; Feb 22, 2012 at 10:28 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 10:38 AM
  #14  
JoesC5's Avatar
JoesC5
Team Owner
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 41,732
Likes: 1,718
From: Springfield MO
Default

Originally Posted by talon90
Wolfdogs, I'm getting different numbers than you are. I'm showing a difference in diameter of .9" front to rear and a tire to tire difference of .300"

The OEM stagger is 1.2" with your new size tire you have dropped that to .9" (generally right around 1.1" wouldn't cause the problem). My recollection is that the EBCM has an allowance of 5% to accomodate tire wear. In making the change you have also changed the revolutions per mile. Above 70+ may be the sweet spot to aggrivate the wheel speed sensor calculations. Under normal circumstances with stock tires, your front tire would rotate 33 more revolutions than the rear in a mile. With your new size it is only rotating 24 times in that same mile.
I think he's borderline of what the computer will accept in the front/rear bias.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #15  
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
25 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 41,055
Likes: 9,817
From: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Default

Even if the rear tire was smaller in diameter that will not cause the C0040 code. If it did he would be getting the LF wheel code as well. The diagnostics done to date indicate there is a problem in the harness going from the EBCM to the RF Wheel sensor connector. The EBCM doesn't know he swapped the wiring around so it is still calling out the RF Sensor. That automatically eliminates the wheel speed sensor and the connector on the sensor end of the circuit. It does leave the EBCM connector and the wires going from the EBCM to the RF Wheel speed sensor. It is less likely there is an issue with the continuity of the wires than there is with the connectors and their pins so the connectors should be looked at first. While the connectors on both ends of the wire harness are disconnected that is the time to check continuity through the wire. While checking continuity the wiring should be flexed back and forth to see whether or not the ohm meter detects and intermittent open or short in the wiring. You do this to see if an intermittent might be the reason why the code doesn't show up until 70 mph. So far this is just basic fault finding, look at things and make sure they are clean/making good contact, are not damaged followed by using DVM to check resistance.

The C0040 code is followed by two other characters that help isolate the fault. The OP hasn't posted that fault detail although it may be his scanner can't see those characters. Those characters indicate whether the fault is an open circuit, an open circuit or a high resistance circuit, a short to ground, a short to voltage, an erratic signal or a low amplitude (weak) signal. The DVM can be used to check for all but the erratic signal. The diagnostic procedure posted in another thread ( http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-t...ed-advice.html ) tells what to check and the values that should be seen at each check point.



Another reason why the code may not show up until 70 mph is a high resistance circuit due to the connectors/pins or a wire that has been damaged (crushed/pinched/partially cut through). Damage can increase the resistance in a wire. The diagnostic includes checking the wiring to make sure the resistance of those circuits is less than 2 ohms. We are talking small signal levels in these circuits and as rotational speed of the sensor increases the signal level tends to drop off to some degree. The level may be sufficient for operation in a high resistance circuit at speeds less than 70 mph but not sufficient once the car goes beyond that speed. Switching the front wheels to the rear and the rear wheels to the front so the larger diameter wheels are on the front will reduce the rotational speed of the sensor for a given car speed and theoretically raise the speed at which the fault occurs.

If the wheel speed signal is erratic that could be due to an intermittent connection or to electrical interference from spark plugs or another electronic circuit that has been added under the hood or has been moved from its proper position.

Bill

Last edited by Bill Dearborn; Feb 22, 2012 at 12:30 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 12:51 PM
  #16  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

Ugh... I'm so tired of this mess.. My skills are pretty much maxed out here. I don't know how to test resistance and continuity...

The dealership here is as dumb as me so does anyone know a good shop in the central Texas area (Killeen, Austin, Waco) that can help me out? I want to learn this stuff I just don't have anyone around that's more experienced.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 12:54 PM
  #17  
TJay74's Avatar
TJay74
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,715
Likes: 343
From: Norman OK
Default

FT 245/40/18 = 25.72" tire height (stock)

RR 285/35/19 - 26.86" tire height (stock)

new FT 255/40/18 = 26.04"

5% for wear would mean the ECM is ok with the front tire being 24.43" tall (shorter) as it wears, but does that mean that the ECM is also ok with the front tire being 27.01" tall (taller)? That would put the operational range of 24.43"-27.01" if the 5% rulse is correct.

The OP new tire is only .31" taller, the ECM may not be ok with a tire being taller than the stock specs.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Tire size throwing C0040?

Old Feb 22, 2012 | 12:57 PM
  #18  
TJay74's Avatar
TJay74
Safety Car
10 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,715
Likes: 343
From: Norman OK
Default

Originally Posted by GM Power4Life
Ugh... I'm so tired of this mess.. My skills are pretty much maxed out here. I don't know how to test resistance and continuity...

The dealership here is as dumb as me so does anyone know a good shop in the central Texas area (Killeen, Austin, Waco) that can help me out? I want to learn this stuff I just don't have anyone around that's more experienced.
resistance is easy, put your meter on Ohm mode and stick the red probe in one side of the sensor and the black probe in the other. Meter should tell you what the resistance of the sensor is at that point.

Continuity is another function as well that the meter should be able to handle.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 01:14 PM
  #19  
GM Power4Life's Avatar
GM Power4Life
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default

I'm also having an intermittent brake switch issue. C0227. So I'm ready to have a professional chase it down rather than me. Anyone heard of Corvette Warehouse in Austin? Apparently they do service
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2012 | 01:18 PM
  #20  
Bill Dearborn's Avatar
Bill Dearborn
Tech Contributor
25 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 41,055
Likes: 9,817
From: Charlotte, NC (formerly Endicott, NY)
Default

Originally Posted by GM Power4Life
Ugh... I'm so tired of this mess.. My skills are pretty much maxed out here. I don't know how to test resistance and continuity...

The dealership here is as dumb as me so does anyone know a good shop in the central Texas area (Killeen, Austin, Waco) that can help me out? I want to learn this stuff I just don't have anyone around that's more experienced.
To check the continuity of a wire you need to put the leads from the DVM (set in ohms mode) at each end of the wire. One lead to an end. The meter will tell you if there is a circuit by measuring the resistance. Continuity is basically a very low resistance that approaches zero. An open circuit is the highest resistance you can get and it is equal to infinity. One measurement can provide you the information you are looking for on these circuits. If the resistance across the wires going from the EBCM to the wheel speed sensor is less than 2 ohms you have continuity if it is more than 2 ohms but not infinite you have a high resistance circuit if it reads infinity you have an open circuit. If you set the meter to read volts and then leave the red lead attached to the wire with the black lead moved to a good ground (frame/engine) turn on the ignition and get a voltage reading then you know the wire is shorted to a voltage somewhere. Now switch it back to read ohms. If it reads anything less than infinity you know it is shorted to ground. Pretty simple stuff. Don't give up on this stuff. If you are smart enough to hold any job above Ammo Humper (requirements:strong back/weak mind) then you can do this.

Electrical circuits are analogous to plumbing circuits. Volts are analogous to pressure, Current is analogous to the amount of water that can flow through a given size of pipe and Resistance is how much that piece of pipe impedes the flow of water through it. If you have a 1/2 inch pipe that can flow X number of gallons per hour at 40 psi and you double the pressure to 80 psi the amount of water going through the pipe doubles to 2X.

Bill

Last edited by Bill Dearborn; Feb 22, 2012 at 01:28 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE