New vs Old Carb
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
New vs Old Carb
I had this wrong forum: I was told so here it is again.
I have several carburetors, (as most people), and need a 750 for a build I am working on.
The question are:
1. Is a modern carburetor better than the older 70's technology such as a Holly double Pumper rebuilt correctly?
2. Will the new perform better?
3. Is it worth the extra cost?
Thank you
PS. Already got two FI's, going carb on this one.
I have several carburetors, (as most people), and need a 750 for a build I am working on.
The question are:
1. Is a modern carburetor better than the older 70's technology such as a Holly double Pumper rebuilt correctly?
2. Will the new perform better?
3. Is it worth the extra cost?
Thank you
PS. Already got two FI's, going carb on this one.
#2
Team Owner
Carburetors ALL function in like manner: they attempt to atomize the fuel/air mixture in the proper proportions throughout the entire operational band of the engine.
In that regard, all carbs (that are built correctly and not damaged) are capable of doing a decent job. But, some are a bit better than others on specific features:
Holley carbs are easier to work on than a Q-Jet; Q-Jets are better for providing correct A/F ratios throughout the engine's rpm range AND they are more economical during normal driving; Edelbrock (old AFB design) carbs are simple, readily available, but not particularly efficient or precise; some modern carb manufacturers provide good quality carbs, but they are fairly expensive.
If you have an old Q-Jet [that has not been 'buggered-up'] and a spreadbore carb intake manifold, a good rebuild and re-tune for your engine will provide a good 750 cfm carb that is also more efficient with fuel than the others.
But, if you plan to drag race the car a lot and are interested in fine-tuning the carb between runs, a Holley is probably the better choice.
In that regard, all carbs (that are built correctly and not damaged) are capable of doing a decent job. But, some are a bit better than others on specific features:
Holley carbs are easier to work on than a Q-Jet; Q-Jets are better for providing correct A/F ratios throughout the engine's rpm range AND they are more economical during normal driving; Edelbrock (old AFB design) carbs are simple, readily available, but not particularly efficient or precise; some modern carb manufacturers provide good quality carbs, but they are fairly expensive.
If you have an old Q-Jet [that has not been 'buggered-up'] and a spreadbore carb intake manifold, a good rebuild and re-tune for your engine will provide a good 750 cfm carb that is also more efficient with fuel than the others.
But, if you plan to drag race the car a lot and are interested in fine-tuning the carb between runs, a Holley is probably the better choice.
#3
Burning Brakes
carburetors perform on the basis that your engine will take in the fuel being provided to it. A small Block 350 4 Barrel carb is best suited between 500 to 650 CFM depending on the flow through the engine. Big Blocks will consume between 650 to 800 CFM of air flow and fuel mixture.
If you really want the best performance than you could upgrade to an Electronic Fuel Injection carb system they sell kits for these early model engines these days. With EFI you will get more HP and better Fuel economy overall because it is computer controlled for fuel the engine takes in.
Is it worth the extra cost well TCO only tells you this. 20 MPG or 10 to 16 MPG most boast they will get almost or over 20 Miles per Gallon on an older engine. Do you really drive it often enough to feel the difference. Vacuum carbs or Double Pumpers? Vacuum Carbs will only use the fuel you need where as a Double Pumper will waste fuel and if not tuned in properly will run rich and dump more fuel than a Vacuum carb.
If I had the money I would do EFI which is a Throttle Body type Fuel injection system and will provide more power and better fuel economy
If you really want the best performance than you could upgrade to an Electronic Fuel Injection carb system they sell kits for these early model engines these days. With EFI you will get more HP and better Fuel economy overall because it is computer controlled for fuel the engine takes in.
Is it worth the extra cost well TCO only tells you this. 20 MPG or 10 to 16 MPG most boast they will get almost or over 20 Miles per Gallon on an older engine. Do you really drive it often enough to feel the difference. Vacuum carbs or Double Pumpers? Vacuum Carbs will only use the fuel you need where as a Double Pumper will waste fuel and if not tuned in properly will run rich and dump more fuel than a Vacuum carb.
If I had the money I would do EFI which is a Throttle Body type Fuel injection system and will provide more power and better fuel economy
#4
Race Director
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: Corsicana, Tx
Posts: 12,617
Received 1,878 Likes
on
916 Posts
2020 C2 of the Year - Modified Winner
2020 Corvette of the Year (performance mods)
C2 of Year Winner (performance mods) 2019
2017 C2 of Year Finalist
A good 750 Holley DP is about the most universal carb in the world. Works well on just about anything.
That said,,,the newer Holley HP street carbs have a better overall calibration for street use and work very well out of the box.
JIM
That said,,,the newer Holley HP street carbs have a better overall calibration for street use and work very well out of the box.
JIM
#6
Tech Contributor
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,654
Received 4,926 Likes
on
1,931 Posts
If you're looking at a square-bore platform, any of the Holley-based designs (Holley, Demon, ProForm, QuickFuel, AED, etc) in the 750 range will run equally well at wide open throttle. There are variations in the metering block designs and calibrations on these carbs, so there are some that may be easier to set up for part-throttle operation. The Holley HP Ultra series carbs have been given a new-design metering block, which works very well for the pump-gas ethanol fuels we are seeing now.
Any carb you choose will need to be set up correctly in order to run right - I've never seen a performance carb run "out-of-the-box without making minor corrections.
Lars
#8
Team Owner
Carb technology hasn't really advanced very much. Once fuel injected cars became the 'norm', few folks focused on carbs. Lars mentioned the modern carb makers in his post.
The Q-Jet was probably the most 'developed' carb ever produced. And, it has a "variable" capacity; it only delivers what the engine requires. Can't do that with a Holley....
The Q-Jet was probably the most 'developed' carb ever produced. And, it has a "variable" capacity; it only delivers what the engine requires. Can't do that with a Holley....
#9
Melting Slicks
There are many parts of a car that one can specialize in or on and carbs is one of them. A plain old 750dp is a far cry from a fully customizable on, that you can spend several hundred $ on stuff to just be able to tune.
As with most things, if you want the max your gonna have to learn and spend some $ or find someone who does and pay them.
The nice thing about a holley is you can upgrade it as you go and if your like me you'll end up with two carbs by the time your done.
As with most things, if you want the max your gonna have to learn and spend some $ or find someone who does and pay them.
The nice thing about a holley is you can upgrade it as you go and if your like me you'll end up with two carbs by the time your done.
#10
Safety Car
"...And, it has a "variable" capacity; it only delivers what the engine requires. Can't do that with a Holley...."
You must never have heard of a Holley vacuum secondary.
And here's my input to your questions:
1&2. No. A brand new Holley works exactly the same as a 50-year-old Holley. A new carb just has completely clean metering channels. The problem with an old carburetor is many don't respond fully to a typical cleaning and rebuild. Sedimentary deposits can build up in the emulsion wells and a dip or spray may not remove them. An ultrasonic dip may be in order for a rebuild that's not running right.
3. The cost issue really depends. If you already have a core carburetor, then you are out only the cost of the rebuild kit if it doesn't work out. If you are buying a carburetor core to freshen up and use; that's a real crap shoot since many of the carbs out there have had some fiddlin' done to 'em and who knows what mayhem the previous owner created while "super tuning the carb with their mad skills". You see that a lot in old carbs.
You must never have heard of a Holley vacuum secondary.
And here's my input to your questions:
1&2. No. A brand new Holley works exactly the same as a 50-year-old Holley. A new carb just has completely clean metering channels. The problem with an old carburetor is many don't respond fully to a typical cleaning and rebuild. Sedimentary deposits can build up in the emulsion wells and a dip or spray may not remove them. An ultrasonic dip may be in order for a rebuild that's not running right.
3. The cost issue really depends. If you already have a core carburetor, then you are out only the cost of the rebuild kit if it doesn't work out. If you are buying a carburetor core to freshen up and use; that's a real crap shoot since many of the carbs out there have had some fiddlin' done to 'em and who knows what mayhem the previous owner created while "super tuning the carb with their mad skills". You see that a lot in old carbs.
#11
Le Mans Master
oh my, I'm gonna give up my age again. back in the fuel crisis of the 70's
in an effort to improve mileage in my LT-1 corvette i tried a qjet set up by an extremely qualified friend . the mileage was the same as the double pumper i had been running and was less responsive. with that said , i will note it was easier to get optimum economy with a spread bore because you had to push down on the pedal further to get to the same speed. that was my experience and very shortly i went back to the double pumper as the response was better. thats why i run a quick fuel double pumper now. but any carb needs some adjustment to run right
in an effort to improve mileage in my LT-1 corvette i tried a qjet set up by an extremely qualified friend . the mileage was the same as the double pumper i had been running and was less responsive. with that said , i will note it was easier to get optimum economy with a spread bore because you had to push down on the pedal further to get to the same speed. that was my experience and very shortly i went back to the double pumper as the response was better. thats why i run a quick fuel double pumper now. but any carb needs some adjustment to run right
#12
Melting Slicks
The problem with all carburetors is they are no better than the person building/rebuilding and/or tuning them! I think Lars will agree with this. Most carbs I have seen that didn't work properly was because of the person who built/rebuilt it or tuned it. This is not to mention how many carbs get blamed for ignition problems! This extends to boat, motorcycles, lawn mowers, and anything else that has a carb on it.
#13
Team Owner
Holley vacuum secondary system: When the engine goes WOT, the secondaries open via a vacuum diaphragm.
Q-Jet secondary system: The more airflow the engine requires (as rpm's increase) the more the secondaries open to feed it. Thus, the same basic carb can work on about any engine up to about 400 hp. They were installed on some 'performance' Pontiac 6 cylinder engines. as well as Chevy 454 engines.
Q-Jet secondary system: The more airflow the engine requires (as rpm's increase) the more the secondaries open to feed it. Thus, the same basic carb can work on about any engine up to about 400 hp. They were installed on some 'performance' Pontiac 6 cylinder engines. as well as Chevy 454 engines.
#15
Instructor
I recently installed an Edelbrock Torker II intake manifold (polished finish) and an Edelbrock carb on my LS5. It took very little tuning, and idles and runs smooth as glass. The electric choke is just a way better setup than the factory divorced choke IMHO.
#16
Le Mans Master
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Oxford MA-----You just lost the game!!!!
Posts: 5,948
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes
on
52 Posts
Holley vacuum secondary system: When the engine goes WOT, the secondaries open via a vacuum diaphragm.
Q-Jet secondary system: The more airflow the engine requires (as rpm's increase) the more the secondaries open to feed it. Thus, the same basic carb can work on about any engine up to about 400 hp. They were installed on some 'performance' Pontiac 6 cylinder engines. as well as Chevy 454 engines.
Q-Jet secondary system: The more airflow the engine requires (as rpm's increase) the more the secondaries open to feed it. Thus, the same basic carb can work on about any engine up to about 400 hp. They were installed on some 'performance' Pontiac 6 cylinder engines. as well as Chevy 454 engines.
Scott
#17
Melting Slicks
The Holley vacuum secondary system effectively senses engine demand and reacts to it, just like a Q-jet. The actual method used is just different. On a Holley, there is a small passage that goes from the diaphragm to one of the primary venturis. As air velocity increases in the venture, a low pressure area, or "vacuum" (not to be confused with manifold vacuum, two different things) is created over the orifice to this small passage, causing the diaphragm to move, which, in turn, opens the secondary throttle blades. The rate of opening is controlled by a spring on top of the diaphragm that gives resistance to the throttle blade opening. Six of one, a half-dozen of the other.
Scott
Scott
#18
Team Owner
And, I'm sure every Holley comes with a bunch of springs and different sized orifices that can tune that "secondary regulator" to match your specific engine...
At best, it's a crude approximation that opens the secondaries more gradually than just going WOT instantly. An improvement, perhaps, but not very precise; and not driven by engine demand.
At best, it's a crude approximation that opens the secondaries more gradually than just going WOT instantly. An improvement, perhaps, but not very precise; and not driven by engine demand.
#19
Race Director
It IS worth remembering that GM spent MILLIONS developing the Q-Jet.
It is a well thought out, if not complicated, carburetor and very capable for street and race.
I personally have no problem with the mighty Q-Jet.
It is a well thought out, if not complicated, carburetor and very capable for street and race.
I personally have no problem with the mighty Q-Jet.
#20
Safety Car
And, I'm sure every Holley comes with a bunch of springs and different sized orifices that can tune that "secondary regulator" to match your specific engine...
At best, it's a crude approximation that opens the secondaries more gradually than just going WOT instantly. An improvement, perhaps, but not very precise; and not driven by engine demand.
At best, it's a crude approximation that opens the secondaries more gradually than just going WOT instantly. An improvement, perhaps, but not very precise; and not driven by engine demand.