C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

School me on this aspect of suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2016, 05:58 PM
  #1  
CA-Legal-Vette
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
CA-Legal-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 11,927
Received 318 Likes on 269 Posts

Default School me on this aspect of suspension

I should have been working last weekend. TONS to do. Instead, the weather was perfect and on Saturday afternoon, I took a ride down to one of the local reservoirs with the family. It was beautiful and everyone enjoyed it. On the way back, my wife remarked that it would be a perfect road for me to take the Corvette down. By myself !(She gets car sick ). What a great idea

So Sunday morning, I put in half a tank and off I go. Again, perfect weather for top down driving. Tunes playing VERY loud. I may even have been going ever so slightly over the limit. 40 MPH limit down most of the road. In general, the car performed extremely well. I did a lot of suspension work before leaving CA a few years back and it really handles the curves and bumps well EXCEPT when going over rises. Because I had been down the same road the day before in my DD, I really felt like the car's ability to stay glued to the road had room for improvement. My DD has pretty decent suspension (GS430) but a Vette should be able to do better no? Besides bringing changes of underwear, what can I do to keep the car from floating over rises?

Oh and the obligatory pic:
Attached Images  
Old 10-27-2016, 06:55 PM
  #2  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

I'd bet the tires on your GS430 are probably a bit better than the ones on your C3.

There are a few things that make big improvements on modern cars:
1. Chassis/body rigidity - I think pretty much every car built in the last 10 years is better in this regard(maybe not the really junk cars).
2. Newness of components
3. Tire sidewall strength, compounds
4. Seat support...

Driving my car on a public road with bumps it's not very settled. Take it to a smoother track and it does pretty damn good.
Old 10-27-2016, 07:14 PM
  #3  
jnb5101
Le Mans Master
 
jnb5101's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: charlotte north carolina
Posts: 8,117
Likes: 0
Received 100 Likes on 92 Posts

Default

The un-sprung weight on the newer cars is a lot less than the vette (brake discs, calipers, half shafts, etc). That in itself would keep the tires in contact with the road.
Old 10-27-2016, 07:18 PM
  #4  
Jebbysan
Dr. Detroit
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Jebbysan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes on 2,564 Posts

Default

Increase the rebound dampening....

Jebby
Old 10-27-2016, 07:32 PM
  #5  
CA-Legal-Vette
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
CA-Legal-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 11,927
Received 318 Likes on 269 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jebbysan
Increase the rebound dampening....

Jebby
Please elaborate. Increased spring strength?

Originally Posted by jnb5101
The un-sprung weight on the newer cars is a lot less than the vette (brake discs, calipers, half shafts, etc). That in itself would keep the tires in contact with the road.
Stock rallys and iron calipers so yes, it would be hard for me to have more unsprung weight without filling my tires with glycol.

Originally Posted by Shark Racer
I'd bet the tires on your GS430 are probably a bit better than the ones on your C3.

There are a few things that make big improvements on modern cars:
1. Chassis/body rigidity - I think pretty much every car built in the last 10 years is better in this regard(maybe not the really junk cars).
2. Newness of components
3. Tire sidewall strength, compounds
4. Seat support...

Driving my car on a public road with bumps it's not very settled. Take it to a smoother track and it does pretty damn good.
All good points but not easy to address save tires. You think my stock 70s won't perform as well as 235 45 17's?
Old 10-27-2016, 08:26 PM
  #6  
MajD
Racer
 
MajD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lebanon OH
Posts: 390
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jebbysan
Increase the rebound dampening....

Jebby
Jebby is talking about adjustable shocks. When you go over a rise, inertia keeps your rear end rising. At the same time, the rear spring wants to return to it's unsprung arc, so it also pushes against the rear end at the same time. This motion extends the shock absorber, sometimes to the stop. Increasing the rebound makes the shock harder to extend and saps energy from the rear and spring inertia so it doesn't rise as far as fast.

This is usually an issue for folks that have replaced their stock springs. If yours is stock, maybe your shocks are worn out or a stiffer, non-adjustable set may work. Adjustable shocks can be a bit pricey. Hope this helps.

MajD
Old 10-27-2016, 08:35 PM
  #7  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

I just helped my friend try out wheel fitment on his 71 'vette. The stock rally wheel(plus trim rings and center cap) with 255/60-15s was heavier than the 285-40-18 on an 18x9.5 we were trying out.

All good points but not easy to address save tires. You think my stock 70s won't perform as well as 235 45 17's?
I'll answer assuming you're not being sarcastic
I would need to know what tires you have on each of your cars to be certain, but I would say most tires in 235/45-17 except the very cheapest will perform better than the common tires on a 225/70-15. Just looking at the offerings on Tire Rack, best-to-best is leagues of difference in tire performance. Worst to worst (OK, let's ignore the snow tires for the 15) is more similar.
Old 10-27-2016, 10:47 PM
  #8  
CA-Legal-Vette
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
CA-Legal-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 11,927
Received 318 Likes on 269 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shark Racer
I just helped my friend try out wheel fitment on his 71 'vette. The stock rally wheel(plus trim rings and center cap) with 255/60-15s was heavier than the 285-40-18 on an 18x9.5 we were trying out.


I'll answer assuming you're not being sarcastic
I would need to know what tires you have on each of your cars to be certain, but I would say most tires in 235/45-17 except the very cheapest will perform better than the common tires on a 225/70-15. Just looking at the offerings on Tire Rack, best-to-best is leagues of difference in tire performance. Worst to worst (OK, let's ignore the snow tires for the 15) is more similar.
Yes, being sarcastic but thanks for answering anyways. My DD tires are Michelin pilots. Not great in the snow but more than acceptable under any other conditions.. My Vette tires are Kirklands but before you start making too much fun of them, they actually perform better than the 60 series BFGs that I had on my previous Vette. The reason for my remark is that the DD footprint is at least double that of the Vette tires.
Old 10-27-2016, 10:49 PM
  #9  
CA-Legal-Vette
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
CA-Legal-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 11,927
Received 318 Likes on 269 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MajD
Jebby is talking about adjustable shocks. When you go over a rise, inertia keeps your rear end rising. At the same time, the rear spring wants to return to it's unsprung arc, so it also pushes against the rear end at the same time. This motion extends the shock absorber, sometimes to the stop. Increasing the rebound makes the shock harder to extend and saps energy from the rear and spring inertia so it doesn't rise as far as fast.

This is usually an issue for folks that have replaced their stock springs. If yours is stock, maybe your shocks are worn out or a stiffer, non-adjustable set may work. Adjustable shocks can be a bit pricey. Hope this helps.

MajD
Got it. My rear springs are aftermarket (VB&P) with Bilstein Sports all around. None are adjustable.
Old 10-28-2016, 07:59 AM
  #10  
CraigH
Melting Slicks
 
CraigH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,612
Received 960 Likes on 597 Posts

Default

Not trying to be rude but why do you think a 40 year old Vette should out handle your modern DD on the road.

I love my. 71 and for a US car built back then it's a great handler but the auto industry has moved a long way in suspension, tires, body rigidity etc since then.

You certainly should be able to get it to handle well but if your trying to get it handle closer to modern cars you will need some significant changes beyond tires.
Old 10-28-2016, 08:01 AM
  #11  
7T1vette
Team Owner
 
7T1vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Crossville TN
Posts: 36,600
Received 2,713 Likes on 2,271 Posts

Default

When going over a 'rise' at speed, the car will lighten (waiting for gravity to draw the car back down to the road) and the springs will extend. Having stiffer springs won't change that effect, but it will reduce the distance the springs extend when going over that rise, so there is less distance between the [airborne] tires and the road.

To maintain contact with the road, the car would need more downforce...perhaps provided by aerodynamic features (wings).
Old 10-28-2016, 05:42 PM
  #12  
MajD
Racer
 
MajD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Lebanon OH
Posts: 390
Received 38 Likes on 34 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CA-Legal-Vette
Got it. My rear springs are aftermarket (VB&P) with Bilstein Sports all around. None are adjustable.
You should consider adjustable shocks if the rebound really bothers you. I can't think of another practical way to increase the force that opposes the rear end lift. Anything you attach to the car, such as a spoiler or spare tire carrier, to try an increase the drag or weight, adds its mass to the inertia going over the rise and makes the problem worse. The shocks work because the energy required to extend them comes from the generated inertia.

MajD

Last edited by MajD; 10-28-2016 at 05:43 PM.
Old 10-28-2016, 06:25 PM
  #13  
DUB
Race Director
 
DUB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 19,294
Received 2,713 Likes on 2,321 Posts

Default

Stupid question..and it is only because I can not see it in the photo you posted.

But do you have the black plastic air dam/front spoiler that the factory installed on the underside of your valance panel???

I know it not much...but it better than nothing at all and allowing all the air to flow under the car instead of directing some of it in the radiator area.

DUB
Old 10-28-2016, 08:48 PM
  #14  
CA-Legal-Vette
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
CA-Legal-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 11,927
Received 318 Likes on 269 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DUB
Stupid question..and it is only because I can not see it in the photo you posted.

But do you have the black plastic air dam/front spoiler that the factory installed on the underside of your valance panel???

I know it not much...but it better than nothing at all and allowing all the air to flow under the car instead of directing some of it in the radiator area.

DUB
Stock 73 setup. Everything is in place but even though I may, possibly have exceeded the speed limit briefly, I don't think it's anywhere near fast enough for the aerodynamics to be a factor. Any inkling of how fast it would become a factor?

Originally Posted by CraigH
Not trying to be rude but why do you think a 40 year old Vette should out handle your modern DD on the road.

I love my. 71 and for a US car built back then it's a great handler but the auto industry has moved a long way in suspension, tires, body rigidity etc since then.

You certainly should be able to get it to handle well but if your trying to get it handle closer to modern cars you will need some significant changes beyond tires.
I don't for a moment expect it to be equivalent, I'm just looking for better. It was a little startling to me how much worse it was in this particular aspect.
Old 10-28-2016, 11:26 PM
  #15  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CA-Legal-Vette
Stock 73 setup. Everything is in place but even though I may, possibly have exceeded the speed limit briefly, I don't think it's anywhere near fast enough for the aerodynamics to be a factor. Any inkling of how fast it would become a factor?
I've only ever driven my 78 hard, which is a Pace Car with all the spoilers intact, but I'd imagine downforce isn't really an active component until 70-80mph. I don't think I've ever pulled through a turn hard enough at those speeds that my sense of self-preservation started to creep in.

I don't for a moment expect it to be equivalent, I'm just looking for better. It was a little startling to me how much worse it was in this particular aspect.
I've found that in my car, the biggest improvement to perceived performance was tightening up the steering (Borg Box). I could definitely use more supportive seats to more comfortably use the car hard. I'm into the door / center console on city streets when I'm motivated and not really pushing the car hard.
Old 10-29-2016, 06:08 PM
  #16  
DUB
Race Director
 
DUB's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 19,294
Received 2,713 Likes on 2,321 Posts

Default

This thread may offer some answers.

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...o-airborn.html

DUB
Old 10-29-2016, 06:21 PM
  #17  
SwampeastMike
Melting Slicks
 
SwampeastMike's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2015
Location: Cape Girardeau Missouri
Posts: 2,365
Received 427 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

By "going over a rise" do you mean what I call "stomach jumping"?

Does your GS430 have active suspension?

If "yes" to both I believe you have zero reason for concern.

There's a wild rural "stomach jumping" highway in my area that I drove many time in my youth (on the way to the lake) and a few times since. I once drove my STS (with active suspension) on that road and no matter the speed it utterly refused to give the feeling.

Get notified of new replies

To School me on this aspect of suspension

Old 10-29-2016, 09:56 PM
  #18  
Shark Racer
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Shark Racer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2000
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 12,399
Received 241 Likes on 200 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SwampeastMike
By "going over a rise" do you mean what I call "stomach jumping"?
We had a sharp crest on one of our local roads that I discovered the hard way, nearly put my 78 into the cliffside. I was careful from there on out, except on the way back one time in a different car - forgot about it and discovered what jumping a car feels like.
Old 10-30-2016, 01:31 AM
  #19  
CA-Legal-Vette
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
CA-Legal-Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 11,927
Received 318 Likes on 269 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SwampeastMike
By "going over a rise" do you mean what I call "stomach jumping"?

Does your GS430 have active suspension?

If "yes" to both I believe you have zero reason for concern.

There's a wild rural "stomach jumping" highway in my area that I drove many time in my youth (on the way to the lake) and a few times since. I once drove my STS (with active suspension) on that road and no matter the speed it utterly refused to give the feeling.
Definately stomach Jumping as you describe it. My GS does not have active suspension.
Old 10-30-2016, 02:35 AM
  #20  
CraigH
Melting Slicks
 
CraigH's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2010
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 2,612
Received 960 Likes on 597 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CA-Legal-Vette
I don't for a moment expect it to be equivalent, I'm just looking for better. It was a little startling to me how much worse it was in this particular aspect.
That makes more sense and your description of the stomach drop.

I know I have tried many different front suspension changes to get it how I want it. Never felt really comfortable. Lowered with 18" wider tires induces more wander, bump steer etc so latest and what I am happiest with is Borgeson box, Global West upper arms, Global West extended travel lower arms, QA1 + Speed Direct semi coil overs, Steriod rod ends to level the Tie Rods, spreader Bar.

2 biggest Items are Borgeson and GW upper arms. The upper arms added heaps more caster giving higher speed stability And the Borgeson tightened up the entire steering experience.

Have done some work on the rear but that will be next big make over. So interesting to hear what you experienced with a big drop after a rise in road.

The suspension obviously needs to handle the drop then settle effectively without getting any bad deviation from the direction you had set.

Unless your going way fast I can't imagine the air dams etc will have much play in it.

The floating you get, do you feel it's caused by the front or rear suspension in that situation.

Even simple things like a bump stop missing on one side would cause one side to compress more and would make the car move off straight.


Quick Reply: School me on this aspect of suspension



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.