Your Thoughts On This Idea Please
My idea is to power the Infinity 6.5 drivers from the rear channel and the tweeters from the front channel. I'm thinking this would give me more volume and more control of the soundstage. The Carver amp would soley supply the 2 subs.
Any Thoughts
In other words, buy another amp, or, if the Carver is a four-channel, run the subs off one channel and the Infinity's off the other.
The Carver amp is only 4X60, not enough for all the speakers. I going to bridge it to get 120 to each sub. The deck is 4X52 max.
Where are you thinking of mounting your tweeters?
goodluck!
You can do what you are decribing, but.....you must use passive crossovers on the mids and tweets. If you don't prevent the bass frequencies from those speakers, you will distort and blow the mid and tweets.
You can do what you are decribing, but.....you must use passive crossovers on the mids and tweets. If you don't prevent the bass frequencies from those speakers, you will distort and blow the mid and tweets.
Still works though
I have the crossovers that come with the infinitys plus a set of alpine crossovers. My thought was to use one crossover each as you described. The deck also has built in crossovers. I might be able to get away without using the external crossovers. Not sure. Any thoughts on that one.
Thanks
I believe you on the Carver, they were expensive but built well.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I believe you on the Carver, they were expensive but built well.
The crossovers for the mid/highs have general low pass allowance for fequencies around 150 hz on down.
Head units RARELY have any outputs as a low pass crossover. and the ones that do are ONLY for subwoofers.
Does this help any? Or should I break it down more?
snoopdan
The crossovers for the mid/highs have general low pass allowance for fequencies around 150 hz on down.
Head units RARELY have any outputs as a low pass crossover. and the ones that do are ONLY for subwoofers.
Does this help any? Or should I break it down more?
snoopdan

Is a filter not a crossover ?
What can i do with this feature. Do i still need my passive crossovers ?
Your deck gives you alot of flexability to your install, and alot of different avenues for wiring and signal distrubution. Maybe too many for somone that hasnt done alot of high end, multi amplifier installs. I try to shy away from stuff that gets too complicated, most of the time.. Not for the fact that I cant deal with it, just that its real easy to over complicate your install real fast, and add lots of amplifiers and wiring that you wont appreciate or notice the difference if it wasnt there. Ive gone the multi amp multi crossover, speaker specific bandpass seperation done in 4 way systems....Just kinda overkill for a soundstage in a car thats hard to image decently in the first place, if you plan to keep stock speaker locations.
But thats just me, keeping the install simple.
If I owned a fullsize extended cab truck, or minivan, Id go thru the effort...In a vette, your a little pressed for space.
snoopdan

You can mess with the HU active crossovers once you have it all hook-up and see what YOU think sounds best.
snoopdan. Hi-pass in HU is becoming more available, 3 of the 4 HU I currently use have them, even my cheaper DEH-P77 in my truck has them and I use them too.
I know, I know...its just not whats floating out there on off shelf units and ebay at the moment - which is USUALLY where people on this forum seem to get stuff.
I usually try to keep a system simple. A head unit for source audio, and electronics furthor down signal line for fequency managment. Im old skool I guess
snoopdan


















