Dry or Wet Sump for an LS motor....
#1
Drifting
Thread Starter
Dry or Wet Sump for an LS motor....
What are the benefits of a dry sump over a wet sump???
Also, who makes the best dry or wet sump oil pans for road racing an LS motor?
Lastly, is an oil cooler really necessary?
*Seems like a dry sump with an oil cooler has a lot of lines that would eventually develop a lot of maintenance/headaches...basically is all the plumbing for a dry sump really worth all the expense and the maintenance?
Thanks!
Also, who makes the best dry or wet sump oil pans for road racing an LS motor?
Lastly, is an oil cooler really necessary?
*Seems like a dry sump with an oil cooler has a lot of lines that would eventually develop a lot of maintenance/headaches...basically is all the plumbing for a dry sump really worth all the expense and the maintenance?
Thanks!
#3
Team Owner
Member Since: Sep 2003
Location: Raleigh / Rolesville NC
Posts: 43,084
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes
on
25 Posts
accu-sump, oil cooler and lines, for me is 10 1/2 qts. When I change the oil about 9 to 9 1/4 drain out. So I put that amount back in.
Yes changing oil is a little different then just open the drain plug in the pan, but not too much. After the pan drains, flip the sump switch to let the sump drain into the pan and out plug hole.
Too refil do it just like normal. Put in 6 qts, start the motor and let the oil circulate, add two more qts, and let the sump start to fill, add 1 qt let the oil circulate and fill the sump.
Most of the time I will need to add 1/2 or 1/4 qt after a short drive.
Last edited by AU N EGL; 11-23-2008 at 07:07 AM.
#4
Burning Brakes
Worth it? Entirely dependent upon your goals. Heck, I run it (dry sump) on my stock short-block'd LS6.
I'm not following your maintenance idea though... It's very dependent upon how you design and route the plumbing.
I'm not following your maintenance idea though... It's very dependent upon how you design and route the plumbing.
Last edited by OKsweetrides; 11-23-2008 at 12:52 PM.
#5
I have done a little investigating on the engines. From what I have found, the culprit is not the pan or the pump but the way the rotating assembly is oiled. From what I can find out the culprit is the lifter bores. Under extrem use the bores get larger and the oil passes threw at a faster rate and starves the bottom end. I think this to be true because I have a dry sump on my 383 and last weekend at Barbers a friend of mine has a 383 just like mine also has a dry sump and spun a rod bearing during a race and desroyed his engine in the same maner as mine did. The next engine I build will have sleaved lifter bores. Anyone have any input on this with data?
#6
Racer
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Canyon, Arizona
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Former Vendor
If you are building a racecar, there is no doubt that you should dry sump it if you can. T1 rules do not currently allow it. However, both Joe Aquilante and Chris Ingle have petitioned the comp board on this issue. There were several blown motors at this years runoffs and Ingle blew up 2 or 3 this year alone! All of the TCC LS motors have a dry sump in them. Losing a motor, even a stock LS6, is not cheap. Crate motor is aprox $5600, plus installation. Not to mention what you spent to get to a race and then don't get to race. I am not saying you will never blow an engine if you dry sump it, but the track record is that they last far longer with the dry sump.
ARE makes a real nice setup, cost is around $3000. You will probably spend another $500 on plumbing it in. Yes, you do need an oil cooler. I would recommend a seperate oil cooler, not one built into the radiator.
ARE makes a real nice setup, cost is around $3000. You will probably spend another $500 on plumbing it in. Yes, you do need an oil cooler. I would recommend a seperate oil cooler, not one built into the radiator.
#8
Safety Car
Member Since: May 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
St. Jude Donor '08
A dry sump prevents loss of oil pressure under high G conditions, whereas with a wet sump it is possible to lose oil pressure. Loss of oil pressure can cause engine failure, which is bad. A secondary benefit is higher HP due to crank not having to go through oil in the pan.
The downside of dry sumps is that they are expensive and you have to find a place to put the oil reservoir.
Accusump is a nice tradeoff in terms of costs/benefits and seems to work pretty well.
Link:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question331.htm
The downside of dry sumps is that they are expensive and you have to find a place to put the oil reservoir.
Accusump is a nice tradeoff in terms of costs/benefits and seems to work pretty well.
Link:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/question331.htm
#9
Melting Slicks
If you are building a racecar, there is no doubt that you should dry sump it if you can. T1 rules do not currently allow it. However, both Joe Aquilante and Chris Ingle have petitioned the comp board on this issue. There were several blown motors at this years runoffs and Ingle blew up 2 or 3 this year alone! All of the TCC LS motors have a dry sump in them.
ARE makes a real nice setup, cost is around $3000. You will probably spend another $500 on plumbing it in. Yes, you do need an oil cooler. I would recommend a seperate oil cooler, not one built into the radiator.
ARE makes a real nice setup, cost is around $3000. You will probably spend another $500 on plumbing it in. Yes, you do need an oil cooler. I would recommend a seperate oil cooler, not one built into the radiator.
As far as coolers go - absolutely!!! If you're going to be tracking these cars at all, you'll need them. The CRB approved 2 coolers in series for the LS3 car and I still see 300+ oil temps. If you drive an LS3, think about putting 3 coolers on there however you can...and a dry sump. These cars just run HOT!!!!!!!
#12
Racer
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Canyon, Arizona
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#13
#15
#16
Drifting
Plumbing is an enormous expense when done right. And yes you will have major headaches getting the systems working right, but worth it.
#18
ARE makes the pans that AVIAID uses, as well as their own. Definitely wouldn't say they are garbage. I have the ARE stage 3 on my street z06, and a 4 stage AVIAID system on my race car. Both pans are ARE and both pumps are AVIAID.
Plumbing is an enormous expense when done right. And yes you will have major headaches getting the systems working right, but worth it.
Plumbing is an enormous expense when done right. And yes you will have major headaches getting the systems working right, but worth it.
Don't make me post pictures of the Ford pan I got from them to prove my point.
And something I've always wondered about...didn't GM press releases regarding the LS motors claim that the oil pan was a structural member? What effect does changing to a less supportive pan have?
#19
So are ARE pan mounting surfaces not machined flat? In general, cast aluminum is more rigid than welded/stamped steel pans and as a result tends to seal better when torqued properly. Most all the canton pans I've used on small block fords have leaked. If I was allowed dry sump ARE was a consideration, but if the quality sucks then I'll take them off my list.
#20
So are ARE pan mounting surfaces not machined flat? In general, cast aluminum is more rigid than welded/stamped steel pans and as a result tends to seal better when torqued properly. Most all the canton pans I've used on small block fords have leaked. If I was allowed dry sump ARE was a consideration, but if the quality sucks then I'll take them off my list.