Autocrossing & Roadracing Suspension Setup for Track Corvettes, Camber/Caster Adjustments, R-Compound Tires, Race Slicks, Tips on Driving Technique, Events, Results
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

HPR and GSpeed team up on a 468 cid road race setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2017, 02:09 PM
  #1  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default HPR and GSpeed team up on a 468 cid road race setup

-Build Thread-


HPR and GSpeed have teamed up to showcase a number of new cool and exciting engine and power-train offerings for late model Corvette's, particularly for road racers. In this continuing build thread you will see maybe some things you haven't thought of before, but all are either currently available or so to be available products you can have for your own racer or street car.

There has been a common urban myth surrounding the world of road racing, and that has been to have a higher reving engine you need a shorter stroke. You can find this from the history pages of the Chevy 302 back in the early TransAm days of racing right up to the new destroked LS7 builds that have been growing in popularity. Some of these engines were due to rule limitations like the TransAm series but others were done just because that is what was thought to be the only way to do it. What did it really prove? It takes a lot more RPM to make the same amount of HP from a smaller engine, and low to mid range torque suffers because of it.

Since most of us on here are not racing in a class that has a displacement rule, why handicap yourself right out of the gate by using a smaller engine? I know the love affair with a 8500 RPM V8 is one that we all love to hear blasting down the straights but what if I told you you can make so much power across the board there is no point in doing so? What if I also said, if you need to spin it that high and can feed it....there is no reason a big stroke LS engine can't spin to 8000 RPM or more? (more on that later).


Goals: To build a reliable and cost effective LS performance engine package without using exotic or high maintenance components.

Highlights: New and innovative products

Outline:
  • 468 cid LS standard deck aluminum engine
  • lightweight accessory drive system
  • using "shelf" components
  • pump gas for fuel


Episode 1

Short block.



In our talks with Louis the goal on this first engine was to make a big powered engine obtainable to most weekend racers or street cars. No high dollar shaft mount rocker arms. No solid roller cams that would need constant adjustment. No limited production billet cranks or high dollar connecting rods. The best starting point, our signature 468 cid LS of course.



Ground zero is the engine block itself. We use a Darton dry sleeved Gen IV LS engine block as our starting point. In this case it is the typical 5.3L casting. Inside we do use a longer than stock sleeve to better support the increased stroke of the 468. Stock GM main caps are supported with ARP studs and hardware.




Sleeved block



From here we clearance the block to clear our connecting rods for the increased stroke with minimal intrusion into the liners. New cam bearings are installed, main caps are torqued and line honed for proper clearance for the mains. Cylinders are honed to our finish requirements and the deck surface milled to spec. Once machine work is finished, the engine is washed and ready for assembly.




Checking Mains



The forged crankshaft is measured for journal sizes and prepped for balancing after weighting all components used.




Balancing the crankshaft



Pistons and rods are honed for proper pin clearance then deburred and washed.



The 468 uses a number of components of our own Erik Koenig's design like the pistons and ring package for not only a good seal but reduced drag and friction which again aids in horsepower! Here you can see the rings being sized for gap prior to going on the pistons.




Checking rings



Once the rods are washed, bolts are lubed and bearings installed prior to hanging the pistons. Another one of Erik's designs was a strong, yet light rod that provided more clearance for the large stroke on our 468.




Connecting rod detail



With the rotating assembly balanced, parts fitted and washed it is time to assemble.




Caps going on



First step is installing bearings into the block and laying the crank in place. Here we can check final rotating drag and trust movement before installing the piston/rod combo.




Pistons going in



Correctly sized ARP ring compressors are used to install each assembly into the engine block using Motul break in oil.




assembled short block



Once the short block has been assembled we can go in and check our work for deck height at each corner and prepare to install the cam and timing sets coming up in the next installment!



Sneak Peak -


This is one of the brand new items that you will also see featured on this engine build. Louis and the team at GSpeed have developed a completely new front accessory drive for the Corvette. In short, this system has removed 30 lbs of weight off the nose of the car, which is always a big plus. What else is this going to do? It is going to give you a better water pump for increased cooling. A real road race power steering pump setup. Smaller and lighter pulley system, and narrowed belts for less frictional drag. In end not only will it remove weight but you are going to see increased RWHP and quicker acceleration.


I'll let GSpeed go into more details on this one.


C5/6 Corvette accessory drive system from GSpeed





STAY TUNED!

Last edited by HP RESEARCH; 09-20-2017 at 09:16 AM.
The following 3 users liked this post by HP RESEARCH:
Chris_ATL (08-09-2018), fair (09-19-2017), Racingswh (01-06-2018)
Old 09-20-2017, 10:24 AM
  #2  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

First comment in, and for that privilege I only need to say this:

Holy sh*tballs, this is exciting
Old 09-20-2017, 12:15 PM
  #3  
Kubs
Le Mans Master
 
Kubs's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2007
Location: Akron Ohio
Posts: 8,871
Received 1,754 Likes on 941 Posts
2023 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C5 of the Year Finalist - Modified
St. Jude Donor '09-'10-'11

Default



I like where this is going!

Last edited by Kubs; 09-20-2017 at 12:15 PM.
Old 09-21-2017, 10:33 AM
  #4  
z06801
Melting Slicks
 
z06801's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2008
Location: NSL UT
Posts: 2,368
Received 296 Likes on 201 Posts

Default

sounds awesome!
Old 09-21-2017, 07:03 PM
  #5  
c5racr1
Melting Slicks
 
c5racr1's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2000
Location: new orleans
Posts: 3,102
Received 462 Likes on 331 Posts

Default

Sounds good
Old 09-22-2017, 04:54 PM
  #6  
synner
Advanced
 
synner's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2012
Location: no longer Merica
Posts: 89
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Curious how you deal with the piston slap issues and the shorter sleeve for the 442 I see on your website, that's a heck of a long stroke. I'm sure it's a custom piston but would be interested in a bit more detail. Do you still recommend that motor as a road race motor?

Also, what are your thoughts on piston velocity in a road race LS? All the info I find on it seems incredibly outdated and based on a flat tappet SBC with cast rods versus modern motors or ones using forged materials.
Old 09-22-2017, 06:13 PM
  #7  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by synner
Curious how you deal with the piston slap issues and the shorter sleeve for the 442 I see on your website, that's a heck of a long stroke. I'm sure it's a custom piston but would be interested in a bit more detail. Do you still recommend that motor as a road race motor?

Also, what are your thoughts on piston velocity in a road race LS? All the info I find on it seems incredibly outdated and based on a flat tappet SBC with cast rods versus modern motors or ones using forged materials.
Yes the pistons for the 442 are of our own design and no they do not have the comfort of the longer sleeves as you see in the 468. That being said they have no issues regarding "slap" for the piston. Part of that is having the correct offset to the pin, the other is a good skirt design, ring placement, and paying attention to tolerances during machining / assembly.

Both the 442 and 468 would be fine to use a street engines, drag, or road race. Now because of the short skirt design we do not suggest them on power adder cars, so they should be left as NA only builds.

There is no reason why either one of these engines couldn't turn 10,000 RPM as far as the short block is concerned. Piston speeds at that RPM are not even close to what is done in current Pro-Stock drag racing...which you might say...that isn't road racing...but the engine doesn't care (at least as far as RPM goes). What is going to be a concern...or I should say the work is going to be, is feeding an engine of that size to turn those kinds of RPM's. A lot of flow in the heads is going to be needed, a very stable valve train, and intake system to feed it all. The small engines, like the de-stroked LS7, are shall we say easier to do. The engine is smaller and most ported LS7 heads can support the air flow requirements at 8000, 8500 RPM and not really fall of on power production. If anything they probably actually like it there given the smaller size of the engine. On a side note, if you want a 10k RPM engine, going to have to go aftermarket on the sensors and ECU to run it too...but that is a separate topic.

Stay tuned..this first engine you see here will be a milder system build (still over 7200 RPM) that I think most will probably opt to do. We will be featuring a high RPM one as well down the road.

Can't show you everything
The following users liked this post:
synner (09-22-2017)
Old 09-24-2017, 01:31 AM
  #8  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Would love to see/hear some vids of these beasts. Wish the guy that won the optima qualifier had a good vid of his car, I couldn't find nuttin. 468 gotta sound monstrous through the right pipe setup.
Old 09-25-2017, 11:33 AM
  #9  
micjester
Instructor
 
micjester's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2017
Location: New Prague Minnesota
Posts: 115
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

In for details. Definitely interested in the accessory drive!
Old 11-20-2017, 10:46 AM
  #10  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Moving forward.


In sticking with our target of building a reliable big displacement road race engine while using currently available shelf parts without going to crazy on our budget. We are sticking with a hydraulic roller camshaft and OE rocker arms and using current on the market head.

A lot of thought and planning had to be done when it came to the camshaft design. Unlike a drag engine that sees only seconds at WOT, this engine is going to see up to 40 mins at a time on track. Louis at GSpeed, Mr. Godbold at Comp Cams, and ourselves spent a good amount of time working together on choosing the correct pieces to fit within our design and budget layout. More on this later.


First off the easy stuff.
Lifters. In keeping with a 'shelf' part and affordable hyd. roller build we are choosing to use the GM COPO spec lifters made by Johnson. These are the same ones you will find in the 8000RPM factory COPO drag cars and retain the OEM lifter buckets and stock lifter dimensions. Erik has used and tested these in the past, and when used with the proper supporting hardware, prove to be a very solid lifter design.
Some of the highlights of these lifters include:
  • Heat treated forged steel body
  • high flow disc style check valve for better reaction at high RPM
  • improved internal oil metering to supply rocker arms and valve springs without loss in oil pressure
  • needle roller bearing with high chrome steel axle
  • controlled slow leak down piston








COPO lifters oiled and ready for install












Cylinder heads

GSpeed and ourselves when over a number of head designs and options out there from LS3 to LS7 style versions. For the purpose of having a solid power band through as much of the RPM range as we could, we settled in on a set of Mamo Motorsports reworked Trick Flow 260 LS7 head.



Louis at GSpeed spec'd these out with a lightweight 73 gram Titanium intake valve and equally light 85 gram stainless exhaust valve. Tony Mamo did his thing on the ports and chambers for what should be a very well flowing cylinder head (flow numbers not available at time of this writing - updated when I have them).




MMS 265 LS7 reworked TF260's

Trick Flow 260 LS7 casting

Tear down for measurements

chamber with valves installed

chamber with valves removed

intake port




Now the camshaft. Mr. Billy Godbold, the mad scientist at Comp Cams, is probably the leading authority when it comes to actual cam designs and testing valve train systems. Because we are working with an engine designed for lengthy run times on track. A very soft and stable ramp profile of Billy's was chosen along with a new finish of his own working as well on the camshaft. Just shown for the first time at SEMA this year, you will be seeing this much more in the future from Comp Cams.

"We changed our grinding wheels and dress parameters to maximize the load distribution and then wanted a light treatment just to take the fuzz off the top of the topography (like running a finishing mower across a baseball or soccer field). Many of the treatments left a dull finish, but the best one we tested included the burnishing fluid and denser media that also resulted in that more mirror like look. I just don’t want anyone to think it was supposed to be so good looking, but the best finish we developed just had that as a side effect." - Billy Godbold



COPO lifters, GM lifter trays, 4 pole cam gear, C5R timing chain, Comp Cam, and hardware


Close up of the new finish on the cam


Sliding the cam into the 468 lubed with plenty of Motul break in oil


NOTE: Like any doctor we do respect the privacy of our customers so the actual cam specs are not disclosed publicly or to other customers unless GSpeed would like to post them.


For valve springs and rocker arms. Using Billy's own data along with specs from the rest of the build we decided to use a new Comp single spring the 7230 conical. Billy has been using these in his own enduro LS running 8-12 hr races without issue. These will be finished off with a Tool Steel retainer for life, and since they are so small, there is no weight penalty compared to a larger dual spring Ti retainer.


Comp 7230 spring and Tool Steel Retainer




The master himself, our own Erik Koenig checking cam timing.








Stay tuned as we finish out assembly and completion of the long block coming up!!!
Old 11-29-2017, 04:12 PM
  #11  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Small update for today:

If you are curious as to the retainer weight difference here is the original PAC Ti retainer for the dual spring compared to the Tool Steel one for the conical Comp springs.


Pac Ti. retainer at 11 grams ea

Comp Tool Steel retainer for conical springs


For desired compression and quench we are using a 0.051 Cometic gasket set. Heads are held down with a shelf ARP head bolt kit.




With the gaskets on, heads were checked for correct install height, shimmed as required and prepared to go on the engine.


As sent dual springs with Pac retainers being removed and the heads cleaned.


Shimming for new Comp conical spring kit


Comp's 7230 conical spring set with tool steel retainers ready to go.


Heads assembled and torqued


Now that the heads are on, we measured for proper pushrod length and lifter pre-load. Unlike the home user, we have the advantage of keeping a number of pushrods of different sizes and lengths in stock so we can check using a real pushrod, not a checking pushrod. This gives us the ability to look for clearance issues, or any differences from the checker to a real constructed pushrod. *pushrods in route*


Measuring for pushrod length











Now for some of the new cool features.

As you have seen in the first post, Louis and the guys at GSpeed are working on a new dry sump and accessory drive system to allow use of a bigger pump than the standard 3 stage as well as dropping weight with the new accessories and picking up some HP to boot.

First part of this is the Dailey 5 stage pump with Aerator return.

Assembled pan and pump


Detail work inside the Dailey pan and built in pickup screens


Pump return, and aerator return side by side.


Mounted on the engine

Again, I will forward some of the new drive features to Louis and the guys at GSpeed. I'll answer what I can on this.
Old 01-03-2018, 10:31 AM
  #12  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Final pieces before we hand it off to Louis and the crew at GSpeed for their drive assembly, sensors, and wiring harness.



One of the things that Billy Godbold had tested with using the new conical single spring and Comp lobe design was the OE rocker and a new Comp design. Since the Comp rocker is still in development and not ready for sale, we went OE on the rockers. A large part of the goal of this first build is to choose proven components using a sensible budget, and with Billy's spintron testing, there was no worry on the OE rockers.

Louis at GSpeed took the time to pull them apart, tumble them, polish and install Comp's trunion upgrade kit before sending them over for install on the engine. New Trick Flow rocker stands locate using two dowels into the cylinder heads. Due to some tight pushrod clearance, we are using a heavy wall 3/8" diameter pushrod for rigidity as our typical 7/16" would not clear in this case.






Tumble polished with Comp trunion upgrade


HPR 3/8" diameter, 0.135 wall pushrods


Trick Flow billet stands with new LS7 rocker arms


Comp's conical spring and OE rocker arms


Finished long block complete with GSpeed exclusive 5 stage Dailey Engineering Dry Sump







All bagged and ready for customer pickup for the finishing bits! Stay tuned as GSpeed finishes up the new Motec wiring harness in the coming weeks and we get ready to fire it up!
Old 01-03-2018, 02:53 PM
  #13  
GSpeed
Supporting Vendor
 
GSpeed's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2015
Location: Cresson TX
Posts: 1,289
Received 852 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

Ooooo Wee! Thanks HPR! Cant wait to get it in the car and make some noise.
__________________

"Keeping You on Track!"
http://www.gspeed.com
877-512-5180

Instagram_Facebook_YouTube

GSpeed C7Z Cooling Development

2014 NASA Texas TT1 Champion
2015 NASA Texas ST1 Champion
2018 NASA TTU & TT3 National Champions
2019 NASA ST2 National Champion
2019 NASA Texas TT2 Champion
2020 SCCA Majors COTA GT2 pole sitter
2020 SCCA Trans Am Road Atlanta SGT Winner
2022 NASA National Champion ST2
2023 NASA National Champion ST2
2023 NASA National Champion TT2
The following users liked this post:
HP RESEARCH (01-03-2018)
Old 01-04-2018, 05:41 PM
  #14  
fmcokc
Pro
 
fmcokc's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Edmond Oklahoma
Posts: 672
Received 89 Likes on 66 Posts

Default

So I saw in the opening post that the goal was "To build a reliable and cost effective LS performance engine package without using exotic or high maintenance components."

Looks interesting but "cost effective" is variable from one person to the next.

Do you have a price point target that you are shooting for?

If so, can you give us an idea of what it might be?

Thanks
Old 01-04-2018, 06:00 PM
  #15  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fmcokc
So I saw in the opening post that the goal was "To build a reliable and cost effective LS performance engine package without using exotic or high maintenance components."

Looks interesting but "cost effective" is variable from one person to the next.

Do you have a price point target that you are shooting for?

If so, can you give us an idea of what it might be?

Thanks
Very true, there are a number of budgets to look after and what is cost effective to some may not be to others. For someone looking at a build such as this, I'm assuming they are not expecting a $7k crate engine at this level.

Taking the 5 stage dry sump system out of the equation, a 468 long block could be done for say $12-13k fully assembled (using your heads as cores) ready for your intake, exhaust, and accessories. Figure another $3500ish for a 3 stage dry sump system. They all vary of course depending on what the customer wants on components inside but figure a rough estimate around that. Its so hard to quote one when doing custom engines as the crankshafts alone can vary $700-3500 in price, rods $500-1800, pistons....just so many variables it's hard to say without knowing 100% what the customer wants.

There are various ways to say it but...lets call it doing it more of the optimal way with a fully counter weighted crank, small journal rods, bigger cam core, solid roller, better heads....you would be looking at $35k + for a long block with dry sump. Now is that going to buy you 2x the power for 2x the money? Probably not but it might gain you 2000-2500 RPM (yes it could turn 9k+ so long as you have the computer to run it, and the supporting top end to feed it) and another 100-150 hp so long as you have the intake system to support it.


Now on this one in particular I would have to speak with GSpeed as they had already purchased the heads to give you more of a ball park in what this exact combo would be to duplicate.

Last edited by HP RESEARCH; 10-03-2019 at 03:49 PM.
Old 01-04-2018, 11:26 PM
  #16  
REVHARD
Racer
 
REVHARD's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Rochester MI
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

where are all the "internet engine build experts" screaming bloody murder seeing beehive springs? lol

sweet build...wish I had the coin to do the same.
Old 01-06-2018, 04:05 PM
  #17  
Racingswh
Melting Slicks
 
Racingswh's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2009
Location: Chalfont PA
Posts: 2,958
Received 1,074 Likes on 644 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HP RESEARCH
Very true, there are a number of budgets to look after and what is cost effective to some may not be to others. For someone looking at a build such as this, I'm assuming they are not expecting a $7k crate engine at this level.


..just so many variables it's hard to say without knowing 100% what the customer wants.
Couldn't be more true.

Thanks for sharing this really thoughtful and impressive build with us!! Can not wait to see power results and then hopefully see some video of how it performs on the track!!

Get notified of new replies

To HPR and GSpeed team up on a 468 cid road race setup

Old 08-24-2018, 10:35 AM
  #18  
0HP RESEARCH
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
 
HP RESEARCH's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2017
Location: McKinney TX
Posts: 685
Received 211 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

We have had a few questions come in about this particular build. The engine is completed at GSpeed but the car in question is going to be doing some class racing for the remainder of the year and the 468 is not legal for that class, so it will possibly be testing over the winter.

We do have a few more variations of the 468 coming up for local customers, and a few more for the group at GSpeed to show off some other combo's as well.
Old 08-25-2018, 01:34 PM
  #19  
KnightDriveTV
Supporting Vendor
 
KnightDriveTV's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2016
Location: Lookin over Hoover Dam
Posts: 3,513
Received 2,316 Likes on 990 Posts
Default

Really wanted to hear this beast....

Could it be feasible to just do a 468 shortblock, put on LS6 heads/intake/exhaust as a means to get it in the car, tuned/running, then upgrade the top end as budget allows? Certainly would choke it but, I imagine it'd still be stout, no?

Last edited by KnightDriveTV; 08-25-2018 at 01:36 PM.
Old 08-25-2018, 09:07 PM
  #20  
Bad_AX
Burning Brakes
 
Bad_AX's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 978
Received 99 Likes on 77 Posts

Default

I still want to know about the revised accessory drive system.


Quick Reply: HPR and GSpeed team up on a 468 cid road race setup



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.