Pertronix conversion
I have no experience with either one and can go with either of the options...so, I'm looking for imput. The current motor is a bone stock 350, but over the next few months it will morph into a 383 or a new GM 383 will be installed. Naturally the tach drive it the biggest issue that I can see since all the replacement units are good up to 6500 rpms and the car won't be on the track anyway. I appreciate all the imput you guys can give. Thanks , Phil





A caution note on having the distributor "rebuilt." If you're seeing cross gear wear or problems, the distributor housing often will have a significant amount of wear in the cross gear thrust area: the gear will often dig itself a counterbore right into the side of the housing. If this is not correctly repaired by having a custom thrust button fabricated to fill in this area, the new gear will dig itself into this counterbore, lock up, and take out the mainshaft as well as itself. Make sure the person doing the "rebuild" has the ability to correctly repair the common problems on the tach-drive distributor...
I'm curious about this statement. I don't know much about the pertronix, but what about the HEI option ? Aren't most C3's using that? Why are they using it, mainly for emissions ?
What Lars posted.
The best fix for a worn distributer housing is a 5/16-24 x 5/8 socket set screw with a jam nut. We drilled and tapped mine with an end milling machine using the coupler to line things up (drill press is ok but less solid). Grind and polish the end of the set screw very smooth to provide thrust surface for cross gear. Jam nut provides adjustment for endplay. Later model C3's had a nylon button I think. Some of the parts houses sell tooling and parts to do this.
HEI was part of the catalytic converter package installed on virtually all GM models beginning in '75. A misfiring conventional ignition can rapidly overhead the converter. The HEI generally works perfectly or doesn't work at all - often without warning.
Points work just fine on a vintage car, and they rarely fail. If they do, your spare set in the glove box can be swapped in within a few minutes.
One of the best features about vintage cars is that they are SIMPLE - no "black boxes" to fail suddenly and leave you stranded, and you can troubleshoot the entire electrical system with a $15 Radio Shack multimeter.
Duke
I gave consideration to converting mine as I was rebuilding it recently and just decided I couldn't think of a single good reason to go away from something that had always performed well and never left me stranded and, to something that offered no better performance and could well leave me on the side of the road.





The GM HEI system is actually very good. But as Duke noted, they did not come with tach drives, and the physical size of the dstributor makes it visually incorrect in a C2, precluding use of the stock shielding. There are some companies offering a tach drive HEI distributor (Mid America & others) for those wanting the advantages of the HEI system.
For ease of tuning, reliability, and overall good performance, it's very tough to beat the stock point-style distributor. This distributor is very "tuneable" and it's easy to change the characteristics of the timing curve for optimum performance - easier than the HEI. If you want to add some performance to the points system, you can run an MSD-6AL and use the points to trigger it.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I have to disagree. Points wear, the rubbing block wears (changing the dwell) and points bounce (unless you use a very strong spring, then the rubbing block wears faster). Recurving a distributor has nothing to do with the points so you can do all that AND do the conversion. It's time to get out of the 60's and upgrade.

P.S. There's a reason they haven't used points in 30 years.
Last edited by JWD01; Mar 17, 2005 at 07:31 PM.
Points work just fine on a vintage car, and they rarely fail. If they do, your spare set in the glove box can be swapped in within a few minutes.
Duke[/QUOTE]
my father always told me to keep a spare setof points in the glove compartment with a pack of matches, the match pack was a good enough gap setter to get it running and get you home, and believe me it worked
Now I've installed the SE breakerless system from T.I. Specialties in my '66 SB 300hp and it works great. Plugs have an even burn over all eight, which I didn't have before. However, it's still electronic stuff which is why I have a set of points and cond. in the glove box.
Just my $.02....
Frank
i bet u guys w/points are too busy to do that





I've had no problems, but thinking back, I wouldn't do it again.
I'm actually thinking of taking it out.
Points really aren't that hard to maintain, especially on a vehicle that doesn't get driven frequently.
Points are simple and there isn't much to go wrong. And, when something does go wrong with them, it is extremely rare that it will quit completely.
In the time I ran vehicles with points, more years than I like to think, I never had one leave me down because of points -- had some run badly, missing etc. But, never actually quit.
With electronic ignition, I've had a few cases of coming to a halt.
Now, let me tell you about my '92 Corvette....the Opti-Spark is a long story.
It now has a Cadillac Northstar 4 coil (waste spark) ignition system with a Delteq module driving it:
http://www.delteq.com/
I did that for reliability.
Tom Piper
Last edited by Tom Piper; Mar 18, 2005 at 08:51 AM.















