engine experts step inside please
Looks like there is a significant either ridge or someone went to town with a ridge reamer and there is a significant bevel at the top of the cylinder bore. If either is the case, it's not right.
As well, are those nicks in the bores? It's hard to tell with the pics.
Anyhow, a bore should look like:

(for the whole article, see: http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...ing/index.html)
Most OEMs and ring manufacturers say the angle of the scratches in the crosshatch pattern should be about 45° to each other, or about 22° to 32° to the horizontal deck surface. The crosshatch angle should be the same throughout the length of the cylinder and not flatten out at either end.
Not trying to kick over a hornet's nest, but I'm curious if someone tweaked two cylinders (enough to deeply score the bore), that were bored out .060 and stuffed with re-builder quality pistons. Looking at the second pic, it looks like they did not get all of the nicks out of the bore.
Again, it's hard to tell from the pics, but if you only have 1000 miles on the engine, I'd be looking to get my money back from the business and going elsewhere that will do quality work.
Hope the business is a stand-up business....
-- Joe






Also, and I know you know this, a .060" over is just fine and within factory limits for 396 4-bolt main blocks.
Last edited by Thorson; Dec 30, 2010 at 02:03 AM.
Also, and I know you know this, a .060" over is just fine and within factory limits for 396 4-bolt main blocks.
as far as legal action??......fuggetaboutit!




Lawyers don't come cheap. Spend your money with a first class engine builder instead.









