When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does 64 silver blue paint have any metallic in it? Thanks
YES...by the fact that is has SILVER in it...it HAS TO be a metallic. AND if you look up the color formula...it will more than likely use the word 'poly' which means metallic.
YES...by the fact that is has SILVER in it...it HAS TO be a metallic. AND if you look up the color formula...it will more than likely use the word 'poly' which means metallic.
DUB
Huh? I thought poly was short for polyurethane which can be metallic or non-metallic?
Does 64 silver blue paint have any metallic in it? Thanks
The metallic in the original Dupont formulas are so small you almost almost need a magnifier to see them. Modern metallics are much larger. Rule of thumb is if you can pick out individual metallic from a 2 foot distance with the naked eye, then the metallic is too large to be "correct".
Huh? I thought poly was short for polyurethane which can be metallic or non-metallic?
As you know..'polyurethane' is a type of paint. And I do not believe that 'polyurethane paint' was available back in the 60's for painting cars. But in my super old PPG color guides for different years...when the color says 'poly' ...it is a metallic without a doubt. Because 'Tuxedo Black' does not have 'poly' in its name...and neither does 'Roman Red'.
All 1964 Corvette paints were Acrlic Lacquer made by Dupont or RM. The NCRS has books on the subject. ''POLY'' is a term used since the 90's when polyurthene became a good paint product used in more modern applications. In a single stage application without clear coat it has a close approxmitation to the original color. If clear is added on top, which most paint shops use, then then original color is darkened way different from original.
It is almost impossible to fine original lacquer paint as the ''toners'' are no longer made, not to mention that laws forbid lacquer paint due to AIR RESOURCE BOARDS in each state. California outlawed lacquer back in the 90's, and today most states with strong smog and clean air laws have adapted the same.
Experts in the Corvette hobby can find what you want, but be prepared to pay $1000 per gallon.
In a single stage application without clear coat it has a close approxmitation to the original color. If clear is added on top, which most paint shops use, then then original color is darkened way different from original.
I have to custom tint colors to get them to darn near match the original color even after the clear is applied. But the depth to the color given when the clear is added on top is something I can not change or alter. Because there has to be enough clear (mil thickness) on the color to protect it...especially if it is a bsaecoat color applied.
Originally Posted by jimgessner
not to mention that laws forbid lacquer paint due to AIR RESOURCE BOARDS in each state. California outlawed lacquer back in the 90's, and today most states with strong smog and clean air laws have adapted the same.
I am lucky and can still get lacquer in my state...not that i sue it often...and what it basically boils down to is not the paint so much...as the VOC's ( Volatile Organic Compounds)...basically the lacquer thinner and how much of it is needed to thin the paint and make it able to be sprayed is where the problem lies. All of those vapors when spraying and drying...that is the problem with states not allowing lacquer.