When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
There have been advances in technology the last few years. I'd go for the replacement radiator; what is there to lose, eighty bucks?
No advances that I know of and I do this for a living. If I could improve our performance I would. That would give me an advantage over the competition.
I think by now the majority of people accept the fact switching from a cooper radiator to an aluminum radiator is an upgrade. So in this case, switching from a factory aluminum radiator to a copper one must be a downgrade.
The people that tell me the copper worked for them usuually live somewhere like Canada or Maine, where the ambient temperatures don't exceed 80 degrees.
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
Originally Posted by Tom DeWitt
No advances that I know of and I do this for a living. If I could improve our performance I would. That would give me an advantage over the competition.
I think by now the majority of people accept the fact switching from a cooper radiator to an aluminum radiator is an upgrade. So in this case, switching from a factory aluminum radiator to a copper one must be a downgrade.
The people that tell me the copper worked for them usuually live somewhere like Canada or Maine, where the ambient temperatures don't exceed 80 degrees.
Sir, as your radiators appear to be the "gold" standard (play on metals there), I would never disagree with you, and if I am need of one, yours are tops on my list.
However, if you could settle a bet, I would appreciate it. Copper has a higher thermal conductivity than aluminum. That is a fact of science. Of course aluminum has a price advantage over copper.
But given the material properties of copper, why is an aluminum radiator better? Not saying that it isn't FWIW, just wondering why it is?
Has the OP ever mentioned whether his temperatures are stop/go or highway.
For reference, I have a copper radiator in my '65. It doesn't cool like the OEM radiator did when new but stop/go in 90* heat gives me about 205*. Back on the road and moving, the temp drops back down to 180*.
90* stop/go in a coupe is too hot for me to be in anyway.
Sir, as your radiators appear to be the "gold" standard (play on metals there), I would never disagree with you, and if I am need of one, yours are tops on my list.
However, if you could settle a bet, I would appreciate it. Copper has a higher thermal conductivity than aluminum. That is a fact of science. Of course aluminum has a price advantage over copper.
But given the material properties of copper, why is an aluminum radiator better? Not saying that it isn't FWIW, just wondering why it is?
Copper has a higher thermal conductivity than aluminum. That is a fact of science. Of course aluminum has a price advantage over copper.
But given the material properties of copper, why is an aluminum radiator better? Not saying that it isn't FWIW, just wondering why it is?
Copper is also heavier, and has less strength than aluminum, which makes it uncompetitive in a straight-up comparison of fabrication of tube-and-fin radiators. That's the short version.
Copper has a higher thermal conductivity than aluminum. That is a fact of science. Of course aluminum has a price advantage over copper.
just wondering why it is?
Thanks
You are correct. Copper does conduct heat (and electricity) better than aluminum and that is why the controversy goes on forever.
Around 35 years ago, auto engineers understood that if you created more tube-to-fin contact you would increase cooling. You could do this two ways, 1) wider tubes 2) shorter fin providing more tubes in a given area. The problem with doing this with copper is all that added material added a significant amount of weight. So they switched to aluminum for the wieght advantage. It is really more about design than material. The cooling advantage of wider/closer tubes outweighs the difference on thermal conductivity.
Worked for one of the worlds largest aluminum companies for 30 years. The only reason aluminum is used is weight savings. Cu is easier to fab, repair, and corrodes less, but it's simply heavy. The thermal advantages of Cu are simply not great enough to overcome the weight savings, even from a larger aluminum one to remove the same heat. I've been retired for a few years, but I'm guessing the cost factor has reversed and Cu will likely cost more for raw materials now than aluminum. Didn't use to be that way.
I ended up buying the nearly new copper/brass radiator (as described to me) from forum member "Rtruman". Very nice price, excellent communication and he accepted a personal check and didn't wait for check to clear before shipping so in my book, this guy is as good as they get. Thanks RT
I ended up buying the nearly new copper/brass radiator (as described to me) from forum member "Rtruman". Very nice price, excellent communication and he accepted a personal check and didn't wait for check to clear before shipping so in my book, this guy is as good as they get. Thanks RT
Thanks Downeaster64 glad it worked for you enjoy helping members
I have gotten help from these guys thru the years. Its true what goes around comes around, Thanks for the beer.
I ended up buying the nearly new copper/brass radiator (as described to me) from forum member "Rtruman". Very nice price, excellent communication and he accepted a personal check and didn't wait for check to clear before shipping so in my book, this guy is as good as they get. Thanks RT
When you get the RT radiator installed let us know how things work out.
Although thermal conductivity of the tube material plays a role in the OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT for this system, it is not significant between the two metals. The significant part of this OVERALL coefficient is heat transfer between the air and the tube metal. Improvements in this area pay the biggest dividends in performance.
Some supplemental info to add to Tom and JohnZ comments.
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
Originally Posted by Powershift
Although thermal conductivity of the tube material plays a role in the OVERALL HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT for this system, it is not significant between the two metals. The significant part of this OVERALL coefficient is heat transfer between the air and the tube metal. Improvements in this area pay the biggest dividends in performance.
Some supplemental info to add to Tom and JohnZ comments.
Pretty much............for heat transfer equipment, the DELTA T above is actually DELTA T ln mean (natural log mean).
U = overall heat transfer coefficient is comprised of a number of different/separate individual coefficients, one of which includes the thermal conductivity of the metal of the heat exchanger tube wall.
The POINT here being that the heat transfer rate from air stream to the tube wall basically sets the U number in our case. Yes, tube material matters, but in our case not much. However, radiator construction and fin design matter a whole lot.
Pretty much............for heat transfer equipment, the DELTA T above is actually DELTA T ln mean (natural log mean).
U = overall heat transfer coefficient is comprised of a number of different/separate individual coefficients, one of which includes the thermal conductivity of the metal of the heat exchanger tube wall.
The POINT here being that the heat transfer rate from air stream to the tube wall basically sets the U number in our case. Yes, tube material matters, but in our case not much. However, radiator construction and fin design matter a whole lot.
Larry
Hey guys, quit pissing on your keyboards. No one here to impress.
Hey guys, quit pissing on your keyboards. No one here to impress.
At what level do you want to converse?? Some things require more than "torque to 25 ft-lbs" or "replace with this part number".
I've been turning wrenches and repairing/modifying these cars for over 55 years. I know fiberglass, paint, and grease as well as just about anyone here. I simply responded to Rhino's question with some technical data. Sorry if it wasn't what you wanted to read.
At what level do you want to converse?? Some things require more than "torque to 25 ft-lbs" or "replace with this part number".
I've been turning wrenches and repairing/modifying these cars for over 55 years. I know fiberglass, paint, and grease as well as just about anyone here. I simply responded to Rhino's question with some technical data. Sorry if it wasn't what you wanted to read.
Larry
Yeah I couldn't understand all that gobledegook either but I know some here appreciate the technical side of things. I like answers that are yes, no or I don't know.!