When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Well I have a 59 model that was a 230 hp 4 barrel car. When I got the car I got it for a fair price numbers matching or not because they didn't know and I didn't care. Turns out it's not. No harm since I didn't pay numbers matching money but I do want the car correct and to feel like a 59 230hp when I step on it. I looked and the intake and carb are correct for my car but the block casting number is 3896944. That comes back as a 1967 283 195hp.
So from what I read that motor was 195 hp because it was a 2 barrel. If I have the original vette parts on that short block will I still be close to 230hp?
My other question is, there is no Vin on the stamping pad so how can I tell if this was a GM replacement block. I doubt it matters but I want to know what I have.
DE suffix code was used from 58-69 from 58-67 it was a 283/195 from 58-59 in passenger cars 64 in a Chevy II's 65-67 in chevelles and in 68-69 it was a 307/200 used in most cars. all but 69 was 2 barrel PG in 69 it was a 2 barrel 4 speed
your block was assembled in April 24 built in Flint. so we need a casting date
DE suffix code was used from 58-69 from 58-67 it was a 283/195 from 58-59 in passenger cars 64 in a Chevy II's 65-67 in chevelles and in 68-69 it was a 307/200 used in most cars. all but 69 was 2 barrel PG in 69 it was a 2 barrel 4 speed
your block was assembled in April 24 built in Flint. so we need a casting date
where do I find it? The motor is in the car so I was having a hard time finding numbers
What do you think about the difference to my original engine HP wise? It's got the correct 59 vette intake and carb. Do you think that will get me up to 230 from the 195 it would have had with the 2 barrel?
Last edited by Root2812; Jan 28, 2017 at 09:19 PM.
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
What you have in it is only good to sell to defray the costs of putting a correctly date-coded block in it.
IIRC, '59s did not have a VIN derivative on the block (only in mid-1960 and beyond), so you "only" need a block correctly dated to match your car's build date, and with correct casting dates and codes.
These are not high volume items, but can be found.
I would like to have your problem.
Edit: how do you know it was built with a 230HP?
As far as honkin' power goes, a 230 HP will not light up your life.
BUT, cruising in a '59 is about as cool as it gets.
Last edited by Easy Rhino; Jan 28, 2017 at 09:21 PM.
I assume it was the 230hp because the numbers on the intake are correct for my car and the only single 4 barrel option in 59 was the 230hp one. I know 230hp wouldn't blow me away but I want it feel like it should. If it's only pulling 200 I know I won't feel it but I just wanted to know.
If I can ever find a date coded block that came with a manual I would be happy. I don't know if my transmission is correct now either. If I ever find a block I can address the transmission then if it's not right.
and you are right about a 59 being cool. It's my dream car so I didn't care if it was original or not when I got it and I would drive it if it only had 100hp. I still might try and bump it up a bit over time
Last edited by Root2812; Jan 29, 2017 at 03:07 PM.
The blocks and pistons are about the same, but you'll get the power from the camshaft, heads, and carb/intake. So you need to figure out what heads and cam you have. Heads, easy, cam, not so much. The possibility that the original heads were swapped and a camshaft was upgraded when the 195 HP engine was installed is a pretty good one, so don't give up just yet!
If your block is a 307 block these were 283's with the 327 crankshaft. They had more torque than the 283. I had one in a 1971 GM Blazer. Ran like a top with great MPG but was not fast. But that was a 5000 pound vehicle.
Last edited by Westlotorn; Jan 29, 2017 at 03:35 PM.
Without splitting hairs, the difference between a 195 hp 283 and a 220/230 hp 283 was the difference between a two barrel carb and a four barrel carb.
Both had very similar camshafts, same compression ratio, same size ports and valves. All 195's had single exhaust.
thanks. That's what I was hoping for. So performance wise my car should feel like stock since they used the corvette dual exhaust, intake, and 4 barrel carb?
I will have to check out the head numbers one of these days. I'm only with my car one weekend a month right now and I left already this weekend. Storing them in other locations can suck.
If your heads have this casting symbol on each end, you're in good shape as far as heads/compression/valves go.
Never mind the casting number.
Thanks for this. I got up north to where my car is stored this weekend and I checked. My heads do have that symbol. My dad also had another 283 in the corner that needs built and he was planning on scrapping it so I went and looked at that one too. It also had heads with that symbol so I am going to take them off and save them too.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.