When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Do you understand what a harmonic balancer does and why one size does not fit all?
As previously recommended, I would consult professional advice in this regard.
Yes, and I am looking at the web site of Fluiddampr for one and they list several that are for small block and they are different sizes, hence the question about the original size for a 57 270 h.p. balancer.
My engine will be internally balanced as I stated earlier. Are you suggesting I need an 8" balancer? My rpms will seldom if and exceed 6000.
The original balancer off my 283 HP 283 FI engine is 6 1/8 inches in diameter.
Should be the same on the 270 HP engine.
Second pix shows actual dia measurement.
See attached pics.
I might have a spare, if you are interested in it I will hunt for it.
Can you tell me what the diameter and thickness is of an original for a 57 270 h.p. balancer is?
Don't know about the Corvette 57, but I have a '57 Belair with power pack and the balancer is very small, about 6" and it is one piece (no rubber inbetween. i image that would be a very bad set up for your purpose. My 70 LT-1 engine in my '62 has an 8" balancer.
Yes, and I am looking at the web site of Fluiddampr for one and they list several that are for small block and they are different sizes, hence the question about the original size for a 57 270 h.p. balancer.
My engine will be internally balanced as I stated earlier. Are you suggesting I need an 8" balancer? My rpms will seldom if and exceed 6000.
May be splitting hairs here, but it is of no consequence that your engine is internally or externally balanced. The "balancer" has no affect on bringing your engine into a balanced operation. This "balancer" is not a "balancer" in the rotational sense, but rather is a harmonic damper. It's purpose is to absorb and lessen the torsional flex in a crankshaft to prevent fatigue failure.
So, am I correct in assuming from all of this that an original type 6 1/8" balancer should be fine on this 383 stroker as long as I keep it under 6000 rpms?
May be splitting hairs here, but it is of no consequence that your engine is internally or externally balanced. The "balancer" has no affect on bringing your engine into a balanced operation. This "balancer" is not a "balancer" in the rotational sense, but rather is a harmonic damper. It's purpose is to absorb and lessen the torsional flex in a crankshaft to prevent fatigue failure.
Are you aware that Chevy 400 CID engines used an offset balance (special) balancer?
And that the 400 crank (3.75" stroke) is what is used in 383 engines (some with different main bearing diameters, but most with the same basic balance configuration).
And that most 383 CID engines are externally balanced, and require that offset balancer (plus offset balance flywheel or flexplate) be used, or they will shake themselves to death in short order?
Plasticman
Last edited by Plasticman; Mar 21, 2017 at 02:49 PM.
So, am I correct in assuming from all of this that an original type 6 1/8" balancer should be fine on this 383 stroker as long as I keep it under 6000 rpms?
No! Maximum rpm has nothing to do with harmonic balancer design requirements.
I'd again advise you to contact an expert for your needs. I'd be surprised if anyone on this forum has the technical background to make a specific recommendation but I could be wrong.
Anything that looks like an original 283 balancer is NOT what you want on your motor.
Read the other thread about 327 RPM, and the balancer link i posted. if its hodge podge motor, and most strokers are, you may be better off with a fluid damper balancer.
Doug
Originally Posted by MikeM
Do you understand what a harmonic balancer does and why one size does not fit all?
As previously recommended, I would consult professional advice in this regard.
Originally Posted by 68hemi
So, am I correct in assuming from all of this that an original type 6 1/8" balancer should be fine on this 383 stroker as long as I keep it under 6000 rpms?
Originally Posted by MikeM
No! Maximum rpm has nothing to do with harmonic balancer design requirements.
I'd again advise you to contact an expert for your needs. I'd be surprised if anyone on this forum has the technical background to make a specific recommendation but I could be wrong.
After you read this link and understand what it's saying, you'll be a little better able to answer your own question. I get a headache just reading it.
Are you aware that Chevy 400 CID engines used an offset balance (special) balancer?
And that the 400 crank (3.75" stroke) is what is used in 383 engines (some with different main bearing diameters, but most with the same basic balance configuration).
And that most 383 CID engines are externally balanced, and require that offset balancer (plus offset balance flywheel or flexplate) be used, or they will shake themselves to death in short order?
I am starting with a bare block that is currently at the machine shop. It will be balanced and blueprinted. The intention is to create an engine that looks like an original 270 h.p. engine. I want a balancer that will appear the same as the original 57 hi lift cam engines. I have ordered the deep groove pulleys as these engines had as well. I already have the balancer/crank spacer. I need to know what balancer and timing cover spacer to buy to go with this stock look.
If you are paying a machine shop to balance it then the question of whether or not the small diameter harmonic balancer will work should be answered by the shop if you expect them to stand behind their work. For me, I would be less concerned about a harmonic balancer looking correct that can't be seen unless you lean over the fan shroud and look under the water pump than I would be about having the correct balancer on it to protect my 383 from long term damage.
So, am I correct in assuming from all of this that an original type 6 1/8" balancer should be fine on this 383 stroker as long as I keep it under 6000 rpms?
The short answer is yes you'll be fine running it. You are getting some less than great advise here. Now days most 383s are internally balanced. I would hope you went with a steel crank. If you use the best most expensive damper or the stock one you'll never know the difference. As far as technical experience been building race motors for 43 years. I've built tons of SBCs that run above 9,000 for extended time. I use an elsatomer type balancer, ATI, they're on pretty much all NASCAR engines never seen anything else on one. Sprint cars routinely run that kind of rpm and they don't even have a damper on them. A stock type damper will be fine for your app. Ask the guy doing your work if you don't trust his advise well!!!!!!
The short answer is yes you'll be fine running it. You are getting some less than great advise here. Ask the guy doing your work if you don't trust his advise well!!!!!!
By all means, ask the guy with the greasy rag in his back pocket!
Do you realize the OP is building a street engine and not a race engine? Two totally different animals.
By all means, ask the guy with the greasy rag in his back pocket!
Do you realize the OP is building a street engine and not a race engine? Two totally different animals.
Chev used different sized and different weight balancers on the small block engines for a reason. Stray too far from the "reason" and you will be posting "why did my engine go bad"
During the 70s I built heads that won several NHRA US Nationals in S/S. In the 80s for The same company I headed up the street engine department hiring and training enough people to build 2,000 street engines per year for a total of 6,000 engines while I did that. From then til the early 90s I ran my own shop where I actually balanced engines. And now your turn. I am finished with this thread now as the one thing I do know is if you wrestle a pig in the mud long enough you figure out the pig likes it!
During the 70s I built heads that won several NHRA US Nationals in S/S. In the 80s for The same company I headed up the street engine department hiring and training enough people to build 2,000 street engines per year for a total of 6,000 engines while I did that. From then til the early 90s I ran my own shop where I actually balanced engines. And now your turn. I am finished with this thread now as the one thing I do know is if you wrestle a pig in the mud long enough you figure out the pig likes it!