When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I've been searching for a misfire and checked the cylinder compression numbers.
1: 160 2: 150
3: 140 4: 150
5: 100 6: 190
7: 130 8: 150
Obviously, I have issues with compression but the real problem for me is not knowing what to do at this point. I'm thinking I'll have the heads/valves redone, hoping I won't need to go further into the block, but I don't know what to tell the machine shop or is there another solution? Do I get new valves, springs, seats or what? Maybe new heads? I just need some thoughts to help get started.
Thanks in advance, Jim
327/340 30-30 cam, I think. Solid lifters. Little bit of a Frankenstein make up.
Drivers side head: GM J 20 7 3917291, 10.20.67 build, 64cc chambers
Passenger side: GM 25 K 16 7 3017293, 11.16.67 build, 75cc chambers
Block: 3782870, 3.17.63 Build
intake: GM Winters. 3844461 '64-'65 L79
Verify the readings with another compression gauge. Then, and this is critical: perform a cylinder leakdown test. This will tell you where the loss of compression lies. No point in freshening up the heads if you have damaged rings in number 5 cylinder!
At this point if your readings are correct I would remove the rocker arms from 5 and hook air to that cylinder. Then listen for where it's escaping. It will either be going out the exhaust, in the oil pan or in the intake manifold. This will tell you where the problem is.
At this point if your readings are correct I would remove the rocker arms from 5 and hook air to that cylinder. Then listen for where it's escaping. It will either be going out the exhaust, in the oil pan or in the intake manifold. This will tell you where the problem is.
Thanks, i understand the concept but probably beyond my capability.
Verify the readings with another compression gauge. Then, and this is critical: perform a cylinder leakdown test. This will tell you where the loss of compression lies. No point in freshening up the heads if you have damaged rings in number 5 cylinder!
i think I can manage the leak down test. About freshening the heads, wouldn't I want to do that also even if I had to pull the engine and do the rings?
Once you get things sorted out, if engine needs rebuild I would consider a Crate motor from GM. Put the OEM engine away for the future and drive the Heck out of the Crate with no worries and a Warrantee. Al W.
Are you sure the valve lash isn't too tight on #5? How about the rest?
Doug
I had the valves adjusted like John Hinkly and Duke Williams outlined in their paper. But, my mechanic could have missed it. I'll get it double checked. Thanks
i think I can manage the leak down test. About freshening the heads, wouldn't I want to do that also even if I had to pull the engine and do the rings?
a leak down is similar to what I was suggesting with putting the air in the cylinder. At this point you want to know where its going if it's the exhaust or in the intake that's one issue if its in the pan its a complete overhaul including the heads.
a leak down is similar to what I was suggesting with putting the air in the cylinder. At this point you want to know where its going if it's the exhaust or in the intake that's one issue if its in the pan its a complete overhaul including the heads.
Look at the casting mark on the end of the heads. If they are both double hump the one is not a 293. The compression test should be quite different if you had a high compression head on one side and a low on the other. The low compression casting is 3917293. Also if you do have a 293 head on one side the intake valve size is different, the 291 would have 1.940 intake the 293 would be 1.725
i think I can manage the leak down test. About freshening the heads, wouldn't I want to do that also even if I had to pull the engine and do the rings?
Yes. And be advised that you need to know what you're doing to perform a cylinder leakdown test. The piston has to be on TDC. The rocker removal method Robert61 Mentioned is actually and easier, less technical way of heading in the right direction, although the official leakdown test requires no disassembly of anything.
The shade tree quick check is to remove the spark plug in #5, squirt some oil in the cylinder and rerun the test on that cylinder. If compression returns, you know it is the rings. No need to debate any further.
Yes. And be advised that you need to know what you're doing to perform a cylinder leakdown test. The piston has to be on TDC. The rocker removal method Robert61 Mentioned is actually and easier, less technical way of heading in the right direction, although the official leakdown test requires no disassembly of anything.
This discussion has helped me understand whats going on and how to best explain to my mechanic what I might need done. It's difficult to get someone to work on my car with any "creativity". Thanks, Jim
The shade tree quick check is to remove the spark plug in #5, squirt some oil in the cylinder and rerun the test on that cylinder. If compression returns, you know it is the rings. No need to debate any further.
i read this solution on another thread also. Will give it a try.
Thanks
The shade tree quick check is to remove the spark plug in #5, squirt some oil in the cylinder and rerun the test on that cylinder. If compression returns, you know it is the rings. No need to debate any further.
Probably the easiest technique of all. Every time I do it though, I seem to ruin another special schrader valve in my tester.
The main safety thing in running a leak down test is if you are using a break over bar to turn the engine over to position the pistons at top dead center - always be sure to remove the socket off the crank pulley before airing up the cylinder. If the engine isn't right on TDC, the air will push the piston down (fast) and sling the break over bar somewhere or whack the heck out of something.