When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Building up to be a decent Pertronix vs points thread.
I’ve never had an electronic conversion leave me stranded in 20+ years of use and about 5,000 miles a year. Don’t personally know anybody that has had it happen either.
The Mallory HyFire IV instructions specifically state not to jump start the vehicle with the module connected. There is a by-pass jumper plug to run on the points.
One shop did try to jump start it and burned out the module. When they called me down, I just inserted the jumper plug until I replaced the module with another.
Building up to be a decent Pertronix vs points thread.
I’ve never had an electronic conversion leave me stranded in 20+ years of use and about 5,000 miles a year. Don’t personally know anybody that has had it happen either.
It has happened to me twice in the last 6 months in my 57. I have had MANY MSD units over the year and also had a lot of failures with them. I am done with the electronic.
Solid state ignition is an exponential improvement over points, this is inarguable as a technical matter. That doesn't mean solid state ignition is the best choice for 50+ year old automobiles that are driven in the countryside, used for touring or car shows. In these cases the current crop of electronic substitutes are not compelling. OEM systems used on contemporary cars are reliable. Few of us contemplate ignition system failure in a Honda Pilot. But the "all under the cap" units have been known to leave us stranded. Not often I agree but often enough that given the benefits, is not worth the risk. For those who race vintage Corvettes I understand the benefits. For those who tool around, they are few, if any. As mentioned above, a properly installed good quality point set will last 30,000 miles with periodic adjustment, which is fun for most of us. Last but most important, a bad set of points can be cleaned up enough to get you home, or if not, can be swapped out on the side of the road if need be. A dead electronic module must be replaced.
As a guy who dealt with electronics for a bit I never liked the idea of switching primary current with a very small transistor encapsulated in plastic under the distributor. Even GM HEI modules were known to eventually fail under these circumstances. There is a reason Chrysler engineers mounted its switching transistor in a T0-3 case on a finned heat sink!
The performance advantages of electronic ignition are many. So are a set of high end golf clubs. But the best clubs in the world cannot improve my game unless the player can make use of the advantages, and I for one cannot.
Dan
I am not an electrical engineer but always thought the breakerless SE was not effected by heat that's why in a previous thread I tried to understand exactly how the hall effect switch works. I have it installed in my 67 300hp car and never a problem but I don't drive the car much, if it's not effected by heat I don't understand how switching low voltage primary current is a problem for this unit. I will say i have read about problems with these units here on the forum but i question the installation and car wiring.
Points on my 63 car and never a problem either but I guess I need to check the dwell sometime soon.
I am convinced 95% of the conversion problems are operator error and/or bad installs...
As to the Hall cell - you probably have eight in your modern car - ABS brakes for example...
I now recommend the Breakerless SE conversion as there is less to screw up when installing and works with all other components being stock.
No lingering questions about spark plug gap, plug wires, wiring, which coil to use or ballast resistors in or out....
If you prefer points then use them - I have no issue with them...
Last edited by Frankie the Fink; Aug 30, 2018 at 06:32 AM.
I am not an electrical engineer but always thought the breakerless SE was not effected by heat that's why in a previous thread I tried to understand exactly how the hall effect switch works. I have it installed in my 67 300hp car and never a problem but I don't drive the car much, if it's not effected by heat I don't understand how switching low voltage primary current is a problem for this unit. I will say i have read about problems with these units here on the forum but i question the installation and car wiring.
Points on my 63 car and never a problem either but I guess I need to check the dwell sometime soon.
I'm talking about units like Pertronix in which all circuitry is in one module under the cap. I don't know what breaker-less SE is, but if it uses a remote mounted controller (as in GM's K66) than you are right, what is under the cap is a triggering device (coil/magnet or hall effect sensor) that is not heat sensitive.
I'm not looking for a debate on this, so many of you have had great luck with Pertronix and related points alternatives that a debate is pointless, pardon the pun. I keep spare points and condensers in the glove box of each car. If I used Pertronix or similar, I'd likely carry a spare module.
Dan
Last edited by dplotkin; Aug 30, 2018 at 12:31 PM.
The Breakerless SE conversion is entirely "under the cap"; its a shutter vane system and not as susceptible to dirt and the like as Pertronix and is truly undetectable from stock.....you have to do some tricks to make the Pertronix undetectable...
By far the most often cause of failure in an HEI system is excessive heat. I cannot count the number of modules and magnetic pick-up coils I have changed over the years that were dead due to excessive heat cycles over time. With Ford and GM, modules. With Chrysler, mag pick-ups. There is a reason GM uses heat sink grease under their modules. I agree with the above statement that if you do use points and condenser, do not use the 'uniset' that combines the two. I have seen the condensers on these fail due to coming loose. YMMV....
Breakerless SE in my 64 since 2013. Undetectable from stock as it uses a single wire and the stock coil and ballast resistor. I carry a spare SE module, coil and a set of points and condenser -- never going to get caught in the woods without a tow truck.
Breakerless SE in my 64 since 2013. Undetectable from stock as it uses a single wire and the stock coil and ballast resistor. I carry a spare SE module, coil and a set of points and condenser -- never going to get caught in the woods without a tow truck.
Yes, but much less expensive to just carry an extra set of points and condenser rather than an extra SE module.
Yes, but much less expensive to just carry an extra set of points and condenser rather than an extra SE module.
Or, better still, just run points and condenser and don't even bother with a spare set in the glovebox....That's how I've done it for the past 40+ years...
If you don't limp COMPLETELY off the road in Central Florida -- and I mean a full car lane's width or better between you and traffic, and you try to monkey around under the hood -- you have a death wish...
I have put 42000 miles on my 60 Vette in the last few years, I still use the stock dual point centrifugal advance distributor and I have not had an ignition problem in the 38 years I have had the car. I drive the car just about every day it don't rain, and some when it does but not by choice. I drive it to NY an some occasions, around 1100 miles each way, and only stop for fuel, it has never let me down on a trip, which is more that I can say for my Cadillac or my Blazer, both of which, stranded me more than once because of electronic failure..
I pull the distributor about once a year and replace the points and condenser, check it over real good, put it in my Sun distributor machine to set the dwell and check the advance, reinstall it, set the timing and I am good for another year.
I just don't see where some electronic system could be more reliable than what I have, as long as I can buy good quality points, or I run out of my stock on hand, I will continue to use them.
I don't have a problem with people that think modern is better, I just don't, I guess it is a case of different strokes for different folks
Bill
,
Last edited by Bill Pilon; Aug 31, 2018 at 06:54 PM.
Maybe we should all just go back to good old fashioned magneto systems. Then we could have a three way discussion about the relative merits of each type!
Maybe we should all just go back to good old fashioned magneto systems. Then we could have a three way discussion about the relative merits of each type!
That could keep this topic going for years!
I still got a couple old sprint car mags kicking around, they performed well, try running your new HEI system without a battery or power source. I believe some of the racing series still run mags, I know piston driven aircraft do.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.