When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
How and what do you guys use to move the fuel sending unit arm up and down when testing? I have not done this before and if it's not the problem I don't want to damage it.
Gavin, I tried that and can't really tell if I am under it, over it or actually moving it up and down. I can't see anything and the angle that the paint stick goes in doesn't feel as though it is far enough to the right. What am I missing? Thanks for your response.
Or a longer stick like a yard stick, is there a sock on the end of your sender? is there fuel in the tank?
Gavin, I am quite sure it is the original sending unit, so yes, there would be a sock on the end. I tried a shorter paint stir stick and that didn't reach (I don't think) so not sure a longer stick would be at a different angle making it long enough. Yes, there is fuel in the tank and I don't think I can get my hand down into the tank.
I wouldent try getting your hand in, you may succeed and not get your had out, if there is fuel in the tank the sender should be off the bottom to some degree, if your a half a tank or more you may be going too far into the bottom and missing it. all you need to do is slip it underneath and lift up, I think you mean you used a longer paint stick.
I wouldent try getting your hand in, you may succeed and not get your had out, if there is fuel in the tank the sender should be off the bottom to some degree, if your a half a tank or more you may be going too far into the bottom and missing it. all you need to do is slip it underneath and lift up, I think you mean you used a longer paint stick.
I am of the same sentiment about getting my had stuck, so not going there. No, I used a stick that's about 12" long, but I was in fact looking for the sending arm at the bottom of the tank. The tank is a little less than half full, so as you state, it might not be on the bottom. I may use the coat hanger idea, roll one end back about 6" to create a loop affect and see if I can find it a bit above the bottom of the tank this time. Thanks for your suggestions!
That should work, just lift up gently since you really don't know where you are and going by feel, I'm guessing your fuel gauge is not operating, Have you checked the connections at the sender, blown fuse?
Not trying to steal the thread, but just got a new 62 (to me) and knew it had a fuel reading problem. Ran out of gas between 1/8 and /1/4 tank (during the test drive) and after 5 gallons put in, it registers 3/4 tank. Thought it might be just a loose wire, but now wondering it it's not the sender. Thoughts?
these gauges are not the most accurate, and they move around with the fuel shifting, however mine did the very same thing and it was my sending unit .Power to the sender, I was able to see that the gauge worked by moving the arm up and down . but it was off by at least a half of tank.
I'll fill mine for the 1st time and see what it does and then just pay attention. I never let a car go below 1/2 tank. Maybe it just needs exercise as the car as been with a dealer for some time.
these gauges are not the most accurate, and they move around with the fuel shifting, however mine did the very same thing and it was my sending unit .Power to the sender, I was able to see that the gauge worked by moving the arm up and down . but it was off by at least a half of tank.
Gavin, I am going to take some readings at the fuel sender connections. My '64 was covered with undercoating and the sending unit connections are covered to the point to where I can't safely scrape it off to see what color of wires I have where. Do you know which is the ohm wire? On a '64 it's a black with pink stripe, but once again both of my connections are totally covered with undercoat. They appear to both be the same size as well. One seems to be more in the center, then you have the other one that is a little off-center and then of course the ground. Any idea which one it is?
I use this gripping tool. Just squeeze the flat spring separated handles together opening the jaws, release the handles and the jaws will pick up small dropped parts or the arm of the fuel sending unit to lift up or push down. The length of this pick up tool is about 25" overall.
Don
It should work on C1s and C3s but not C2s - I couldn't get it to work on a C2 Corvette presumably because they use a "powered" sending unit and a voltage divider setup - unique among older Covettes... The device is also buffered internally to smooth out the readings from fuel slosh...
Last edited by Frankie the Fink; Mar 5, 2019 at 04:44 PM.
I use a bent wire.....mainly the solid copper wire I have in my shop for wiring. it bends easy and i can easily lift the arm and or float on the end of the arm. I do this fora ll fuel tank sending units where I can see the float.
As for your wiring. You ahve 3 connections.....one is a GROUND....one is a 12 volt power supply when the key is on and usually it will be the wire that is black with the PINK stripe....the last wire should be the wire that goes to your gauge.
Keep in mind your connector for your rear body wiring at the left kick panel area....it can get dirty and loose good contact.
-0- to 90 ohms is what your sending unit should read when you test it manually....or thee abouts. So i have seen some sending units go as high as 110 ohms for example.
Not trying to steal the thread, but just got a new 62 (to me) and knew it had a fuel reading problem. Ran out of gas between 1/8 and /1/4 tank (during the test drive) and after 5 gallons put in, it registers 3/4 tank. Thought it might be just a loose wire, but now wondering it it's not the sender. Thoughts?
Butch
something is definitely wrong there. adding 5 gallons to an empty tank the gauge should read under 1/2.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.