C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Crankcase ventilation problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2019, 06:42 PM
  #41  
SJW
Le Mans Master
 
SJW's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Central Maryland
Posts: 6,404
Received 1,412 Likes on 933 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
Inlet/outlet, suck/blow, doesn't matter. It's an open hole.
Exactly. And a plenty big enough hole that any combustion gases that get below the pistons or above the valve guides will pass right through that open hole to atmosphere with no restriction - thus no pressure develops.

Live well,

SJW
Old 05-04-2019, 08:13 PM
  #42  
68hemi
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,053 Likes on 1,935 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by MikeM
All you gotta' do is bend over and look. It's in plain view.
Can't see it from the top with the alternator in the way.

However, I was looking at both carbs and at the base of each of them in the front there is an open nipple that with the engine running draw no air into them. The pcv hose at the back is plumbed to a fitting that is in the same base of the carb as both nipples. Maybe there is no vacuum there? It is screwed in there and the shielding is in the way so I did not remove it to see.
Old 05-05-2019, 07:12 AM
  #43  
Frankie the Fink
Team Owner

 
Frankie the Fink's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Posts: 58,062
Received 7,089 Likes on 4,740 Posts
Army

Default

Originally Posted by 68hemi
Can't see it from the top with the alternator in the way.

However, I was looking at both carbs and at the base of each of them in the front there is an open nipple that with the engine running draw no air into them. The pcv hose at the back is plumbed to a fitting that is in the same base of the carb as both nipples. Maybe there is no vacuum there? It is screwed in there and the shielding is in the way so I did not remove it to see.
Pictures would help.
Old 05-05-2019, 08:50 AM
  #44  
Factoid
Le Mans Master

 
Factoid's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2018
Location: San Antonio, TX/Mahopac, NY
Posts: 8,507
Received 5,700 Likes on 2,860 Posts
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C7 of the Year Winner - Modified
Default

Hmm, a nipple in a carb base with no vacuum is very unusual. Are you sure it’s not ported vacuum? An open nipple even if not drilled through would bother me and have a vacuum cap just for piece of mind.

This is a very interesting problem as a new engine should not have crankcase pressure issues, particularly significant enough to create oil leaks. I’m sure your mechanic is competent and has diagnosed the issue properly. Again, are you sure the pcv valve is oriented properly to allow manifold vacuum to draw crankcase gases out of the engine?
Old 05-05-2019, 02:52 PM
  #45  
68hemi
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,053 Likes on 1,935 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by Factoid
Hmm, a nipple in a carb base with no vacuum is very unusual. Are you sure it’s not ported vacuum? An open nipple even if not drilled through would bother me and have a vacuum cap just for piece of mind.

This is a very interesting problem as a new engine should not have crankcase pressure issues, particularly significant enough to create oil leaks. I’m sure your mechanic is competent and has diagnosed the issue properly. Again, are you sure the pcv valve is oriented properly to allow manifold vacuum to draw crankcase gases out of the engine?

My mistake. After closer inspection with magnifying glass and flashlight they are adjustment screws. Boy my eyes are getting bad. Now you know why I no longer do my own work.

Here is a picture of the rear of the rear carb were it is plumbed to the draft tube hole.


Old 05-05-2019, 03:46 PM
  #46  
63 340HP
Team Owner
 
63 340HP's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Beach & High Desert Southern California
Posts: 25,750
Received 2,414 Likes on 901 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 68hemi
My mistake. After closer inspection with magnifying glass and flashlight they are adjustment screws. Boy my eyes are getting bad. Now you know why I no longer do my own work.

Here is a picture of the rear of the rear carb were it is plumbed to the draft tube hole.

The photo helps, as that brass elbow is not a 63' style screw in PVC valve. This is important because your crankcase inlet at the oil fill tube (vented cap) and the crankcase outlet at the draft tube tomato can is the same as the 63' PVC system (and the airflow is backwards from later year PVC systems).

The photo provides evidence that you should have an in-line PVC valve somewhere in the hose between the brass elbow and the tomato can port at the back of the block. The PVC valve can be installed backwards, as mentioned in post 19, so verify the PVC valve restricted airflow direction is correct. The PVC valve is a 0.090 restriction with high vacuum, and closes tight with intake manifold pressure (like during a backfire).

The tests mentioned in post 18 can be enhanced by blocking the oil fill and measuring the resulting vacuum at the dip stick tube at idle with a vacuum gauge and hose (wrap electrical tape around the vacuum hose end to make it large enough for a tight seal inside the dipstick tube end). Don't expect a vacuum gauge at the dipstick tube to read much more than an inch or two of vacuum, but it should read something. If it does not move the vacuum gauge needle, you have confirmed a bigger leak somewhere.

A big misconception with a PVC system is that it pulls vacuum at all engine speeds and throttle positions. The intake manifold and PVC vacuum drops as the throttle plates open, and you have less crankcase scavenging as the throttle plates open (less PVC effect). If you are in the throttle a lot, the blow by pressure will quickly exceed the (reduced open throttle) intake manifold vacuum. You can test this with a long hose from a manifold vacuum port (or tee) to a vacuum gauge located in sight of the drivers seat, and driving the car while monitoring the vacuum swings. Idle and low load cruising should show high vacuum, and WOT fun should drop the vacuum reading (and quickly return to high vacuum decelerating). If you move the vacuum hose to read at the dipstick tube, with the breather cap removed and oil fill tube blocked, you can carefully monitor the crankcase vacuum and pressure as you throttle engine (be careful because extended WOT with no breather vent cap can build excessive crankcase pressure and blow gaskets).

Most engines that see a lot of throttle fun tend to spit oil out the crankcase inlet vent (at the breather cap on the oil fill tube in your configuration, or the air filter housing hose in the stock 63' system). The reports that you do not see oil at the breather cap and down the oil fill tube to discolor and collect dirt on the manifold, locations high on the engine, counter the premise of excessive high crankcase pressure.

Look for oil, and do a few vacuum tests, but do not rule out poor gasket and seal sealing.
Old 05-05-2019, 04:16 PM
  #47  
68hemi
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
68hemi's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2003
Location: Cottonwood AZ
Posts: 10,698
Received 3,053 Likes on 1,935 Posts
C1 of Year Finalist (performance mods) 2019

Default

Originally Posted by 63 340HP
The photo helps, as that brass elbow is not a 63' style screw in PVC valve. This is important because your crankcase inlet at the oil fill tube (vented cap) and the crankcase outlet at the draft tube tomato can is the same as the 63' PVC system (and the airflow is backwards from later year PVC systems).

The photo provides evidence that you should have an in-line PVC valve somewhere in the hose between the brass elbow and the tomato can port at the back of the block. The PVC valve can be installed backwards, as mentioned in post 19, so verify the PVC valve restricted airflow direction is correct. The PVC valve is a 0.090 restriction with high vacuum, and closes tight with intake manifold pressure (like during a backfire).

The tests mentioned in post 18 can be enhanced by blocking the oil fill and measuring the resulting vacuum at the dip stick tube at idle with a vacuum gauge and hose (wrap electrical tape around the vacuum hose end to make it large enough for a tight seal inside the dipstick tube end). Don't expect a vacuum gauge at the dipstick tube to read much more than an inch or two of vacuum, but it should read something. If it does not move the vacuum gauge needle, you have confirmed a bigger leak somewhere.

A big misconception with a PVC system is that it pulls vacuum at all engine speeds and throttle positions. The intake manifold and PVC vacuum drops as the throttle plates open, and you have less crankcase scavenging as the throttle plates open (less PVC effect). If you are in the throttle a lot, the blow by pressure will quickly exceed the (reduced open throttle) intake manifold vacuum. You can test this with a long hose from a manifold vacuum port (or tee) to a vacuum gauge located in sight of the drivers seat, and driving the car while monitoring the vacuum swings. Idle and low load cruising should show high vacuum, and WOT fun should drop the vacuum reading (and quickly return to high vacuum decelerating). If you move the vacuum hose to read at the dipstick tube, with the breather cap removed and oil fill tube blocked, you can carefully monitor the crankcase vacuum and pressure as you throttle engine (be careful because extended WOT with no breather vent cap can build excessive crankcase pressure and blow gaskets).

Most engines that see a lot of throttle fun tend to spit oil out the crankcase inlet vent (at the breather cap on the oil fill tube in your configuration, or the air filter housing hose in the stock 63' system). The reports that you do not see oil at the breather cap and down the oil fill tube to discolor and collect dirt on the manifold, locations high on the engine, counter the premise of excessive high crankcase pressure.

Look for oil, and do a few vacuum tests, but do not rule out poor gasket and seal sealing.


Thanks for the info. There is a pcv valve between the fitting shown and the draft tube hole. Mechanic has checked the pcv valve for correct direction but I will give him this info.
Old 05-05-2019, 06:29 PM
  #48  
tbarb
Safety Car
 
tbarb's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2014
Posts: 3,545
Received 565 Likes on 482 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 63 340HP
The photo helps, as that brass elbow is not a 63' style screw in PVC valve. This is important because your crankcase inlet at the oil fill tube (vented cap) and the crankcase outlet at the draft tube tomato can is the same as the 63' PVC system (and the airflow is backwards from later year PVC systems).

The photo provides evidence that you should have an in-line PVC valve somewhere in the hose between the brass elbow and the tomato can port at the back of the block. The PVC valve can be installed backwards, as mentioned in post 19, so verify the PVC valve restricted airflow direction is correct. The PVC valve is a 0.090 restriction with high vacuum, and closes tight with intake manifold pressure (like during a backfire).

The tests mentioned in post 18 can be enhanced by blocking the oil fill and measuring the resulting vacuum at the dip stick tube at idle with a vacuum gauge and hose (wrap electrical tape around the vacuum hose end to make it large enough for a tight seal inside the dipstick tube end). Don't expect a vacuum gauge at the dipstick tube to read much more than an inch or two of vacuum, but it should read something. If it does not move the vacuum gauge needle, you have confirmed a bigger leak somewhere.

A big misconception with a PVC system is that it pulls vacuum at all engine speeds and throttle positions. The intake manifold and PVC vacuum drops as the throttle plates open, and you have less crankcase scavenging as the throttle plates open (less PVC effect). If you are in the throttle a lot, the blow by pressure will quickly exceed the (reduced open throttle) intake manifold vacuum. You can test this with a long hose from a manifold vacuum port (or tee) to a vacuum gauge located in sight of the drivers seat, and driving the car while monitoring the vacuum swings. Idle and low load cruising should show high vacuum, and WOT fun should drop the vacuum reading (and quickly return to high vacuum decelerating). If you move the vacuum hose to read at the dipstick tube, with the breather cap removed and oil fill tube blocked, you can carefully monitor the crankcase vacuum and pressure as you throttle engine (be careful because extended WOT with no breather vent cap can build excessive crankcase pressure and blow gaskets).

Most engines that see a lot of throttle fun tend to spit oil out the crankcase inlet vent (at the breather cap on the oil fill tube in your configuration, or the air filter housing hose in the stock 63' system). The reports that you do not see oil at the breather cap and down the oil fill tube to discolor and collect dirt on the manifold, locations high on the engine, counter the premise of excessive high crankcase pressure.

Look for oil, and do a few vacuum tests, but do not rule out poor gasket and seal sealing.
I don't agree with your statement that you get less scavenging flow from the pcv system when vacuum drops and throttle blades open. At low vacuum the pintle inside the pcv valve centers and allows more flow compared to the high vacuum idle condition where the pintle pulls to seat for a calibrated air flow at idle to prevent a lean condition.
Old 05-05-2019, 07:18 PM
  #49  
MikeM
Team Owner
 
MikeM's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2003
Location: Greenville, Indiana
Posts: 26,118
Received 1,847 Likes on 1,401 Posts

Default

That's the way it's supposed to work. At some point though, a worn out engine will puff harder than the PVC can suck.



Quick Reply: Crankcase ventilation problem



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 AM.