When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I wonder, does the wrap work almost as well as the insulated foil in terms of lowering the temperature?
And is there any benefit to wrapping almost all of the side exhausts just below the manifold and all the way to the end of the straight mufflers? You can assume it would reduce the overall temperature around the pipes, especially if in traffic...would it also change the sound of the pipes? Not sure it's worth doing.
I use the DEI insulated foil on my race cars and the wrap on my street car. My unscientific opinion is the insulated foil is better and sticking that to the frame and body around the side pipes would work better. But the wrap worked well enough to make my wife happy so I stopped there....lazy I guess but don't tell her
Just had a 2 1/2 inch crossover installed on my side-pipes. Along with some re-tuning, I'm very happy with the mellower sound and slight performance increase.
Nice set up. I am interested in what you had to do in re-tuning. Did that make a difference? I added an X pipe on my 65 and did not retune. However, I have Holey fuel injection. The tuner said it would self tune.
Very nicely done crossover. They really do make a seat of the pants noticeable difference in how the car runs.
Just curious whether the X pipe on the under car system sounds raspy. Therea a late model camaro and a late model mustang in the neighborhood, both have X pipes and both seriously get on my nerves.. lol. They sound ugly.
Nice set up. I am interested in what you had to do in re-tuning. Did that make a difference? I added an X pipe on my 65 and did not retune. However, I have Holey fuel injection. The tuner said it would self tune.
Great questions. Sounds like you answered your own question with the FI. I'm not familiar with what you have but I assume it relies on some form of closed loop system if it's auto tuning.
The engine wasn't perfectly tuned very well to begin with, so it made sense to fine tune after the x-over was installed. That included timing, fuel/air and float levels. All I know it runs/sounds 100% better now with more HP, but I believe it was due to a combination of adding the x-over and tuning.
I was also informed (by my mechanic) having the x-over pipe closer to the engine helps the lower RPMs while installing it further away benefits the higher rpms in terms of HP. Not a lot of HP, just a little bit more. Not sure if anyone else has ever heard this.
By the way, everything took a week because he wanted to make sure the cold start/idle was correct. Old school mechanics who own classic cars themselves is who you want to do this sort of thing. They respect and appreciate these vehicles and treat them almost like their own. There is no substitute for years of experience.
Very nicely done crossover. They really do make a seat of the pants noticeable difference in how the car runs.
Just curious whether the X pipe on the under car system sounds raspy. Therea a late model camaro and a late model mustang in the neighborhood, both have X pipes and both seriously get on my nerves.. lol. They sound ugly.
Thank you, by the way he was able to maintain the 2 1/2" diameter size with the x-over. The x-over definitely helps reduce the raspi-ness, it doesn't add to it. The idle has a nice deep rumble now and the higher rpms are slightly smoother in tone.
Although my neighbors may not be too happy about it, I don't gun it until I'm down the street, lol.
Also curious about the cross over pipe sound effect……if there might be a difference in forward mounted H pipe configuration vs rear mounted cross over, or X pipe.
John
I have been wanting to do a cross over pipe for my '67 300HP with side exhaust for some time and really like the look of the one posted by Black Tux since the cross over is behind the bell housing and low enough to mitigate a radiant heat problem problem. Insulating it sufficiently with wrap should prevent too much heat to the tranny. I am wondering if there is any negative effect on performance or fuel mileage.
Bob
Also curious about the cross over pipe sound effect……if there might be a difference in forward mounted H pipe configuration vs rear mounted cross over, or X pipe.
John
I'm going to guess there is a slight difference in sound but not enough to be apparent unless you listened very hard and able to compare both side by side.
I have been wanting to do a cross over pipe for my '67 300HP with side exhaust for some time and really like the look of the one posted by Black Tux since the cross over is behind the bell housing and low enough to mitigate a radiant heat problem problem. Insulating it sufficiently with wrap should prevent too much heat to the tranny. I am wondering if there is any negative effect on performance or fuel mileage.
Bob
I would expect any performance impacts to be positive by introducing back pressure with the xover pipe.
Well, in my mind, all changes from original configuration need to be assessed; kind of a cost/liability versus advantages gained analysis. I’m an original configuration/period correct guy so anything that deviates from that, especially something visible like this, is a significant hit on the liability side to begin with, that, plus the cost $, additional heat to the oil(pan) or transmission and floorboard/interior of the car (one of the big advantages of the side mounted exhaust… getting all that heat away from the drivetrain and interior of the car)…….. and what are the perceived positives/gains exactly? What I’m hearing is it will make the car sound different than a sidepipe midyear (is that an advantage ?), and did I read significant power gaines? (anybody have any numbers?).
Last edited by 66427-450; Aug 21, 2021 at 05:14 PM.
….. you didn’t put a flanged connection in there somewhere to facilitate removal of a pipe if necessary. But it can be done later if you decide to.
Yes, say you needed to service the heat riser valve? Or gasket or doughnut?, Or drop the pan, etc. One would think a flange connection would be a necessity, as you said, can always take it in for rework/addition.
Well, in my mind, all changes from original configuration need to be assessed; kind of a cost/liability versus advantages gained analysis. I’m an original configuration/period correct guy so anything that deviates from that, especially something visible like this, is a significant hit on the liability side to begin with, that, plus the cost $, additional heat to the oil(pan) or transmission and floorboard/interior of the car (one of the big advantages of the side mounted exhaust… getting all that heat away from the drivetrain and interior of the car)…….. and what are the perceived positives/gains exactly? What I’m hearing is it it will make the car sound different than a sidepipe midyear (is that an advantage ?), and did I read significant power gaines? (anybody have any numbers?).
First of all I would like to state it was 92 degrees here the other day and the engine runs nice and cool so I'm not noticing the rise in heat. However adding a heat shield is good insurance, I just don't have a sense of urgency to install one at the moment.
The second concern I'm hearing is around originality and tampering with the original configuration. It's simply adding an exhaust pipe between 2 other pipes and can be removed and patched in minutes. I don't live by all the NCRS rules 24 x 7 x 365, so shame on me.
I don't think anybody said "significant power gains" were achieved strictly from adding a x-over pipe. Not sure where you're getting this notion.
I noted…. “They really do make a seat of the pants noticeable difference in how the car runs.” Just asking if anyone has any facts/numbers
It's apparent its running better, but once again I believe it was a combination of things that contributed. Unfortunately I cannot do a before and after (x-over pipe) comparison in performance, only sound. While it doesn't lower the volume of sound, it does make the sound a little bit more pleasant with deeper and less raspy tones.
Sorry for the confusion. I meant PaulUptime's car, which has what's known as an X pipe crossover. OP, yours, and the other side pipe cars, have whats known as an H pipe crossover, or at least a close approximation. I have an H pipe on my under car exhaust, its a bolt in kit from Summit and is assembled from two opposed T pipes with a connector between them. H pipes don't usually sound raspy, which seems to be your experience as well. I was wondering what Paul's car sounds like with that big X on it.
Also curious about the cross over pipe sound effect……if there might be a difference in forward mounted H pipe configuration vs rear mounted cross over, or X pipe.
John
Sorry for the confusion. I meant PaulUptime's car, which has what's known as an X pipe crossover. OP, yours, and the other side pipe cars, have whats known as an H pipe crossover, or at least a close approximation. I have an H pipe on my under car exhaust, its a bolt in kit from Summit and is assembled from two opposed T pipes with a connector between them. H pipes don't usually sound raspy, which seems to be your experience as well. I was wondering what Paul's car sounds like with that big X on it.
Hi - I recently urchased an H pipe from Summit, but my Corvette shop recommenced against its install. He said that it wouldn’t sound like a Corvette anymore. Could you share your satisfaction and experience with your install? Greatly appreciated!!!!
There were putting cross over pipes on Corvettes from the factory since 1957. The purpose was to balance the exhaust flow on the dual exhaust. It does make a difference in the sound of the exhaust since you are balancing the output from the two cylinder heads. It also does give a slight performance gain but I am not sure if it is noticeable in the seat of your pants.
Sorry for the confusion. I meant PaulUptime's car, which has what's known as an X pipe crossover. OP, yours, and the other side pipe cars, have whats known as an H pipe crossover, or at least a close approximation. I have an H pipe on my under car exhaust, its a bolt in kit from Summit and is assembled from two opposed T pipes with a connector between them. H pipes don't usually sound raspy, which seems to be your experience as well. I was wondering what Paul's car sounds like with that big X on it.
My goal for the exhaust was for it to flow well with minimal drone, popping or distracting side-to-side. Some people like that stuff, me not so much as I want a car that can be driven spiritedly but also on long, sustained drives.
I never recorded videos of the sound with my previous exhaust setup (but that was with the 454 in my car when I got it.) Here's one with the 350 Edelbrock Performer engine I run now, getting tuned under load at a dyno shop. An A/F sensor was installed into the header and the carb set up over about a dozen dyno pulls.. Since then I have done ignition (MSD 6AL w/MSC Tach-drive distributor) and improved the wires and plugs. Despite this being in a dyno room I think it does the sound some justice.