C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

Help Determining Correct Transmission

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 12:38 PM
  #1  
Kartman01's Avatar
Kartman01
Thread Starter
Intermediate
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 38
Likes: 11
From: Stevensville, MI
Default Help Determining Correct Transmission

Hoping someone on the forum can help me... I have a 1965 Corvette coupe I am restoring which is largely original with numbers matching engine. The factory original transmission was replaced at some point
with a unit from a '67 Corvette. I am working to put the car back into its original configuration and would like to source a correct spec 1965 4 speed transmission for the car.

Attached are photos of the data plates... my question: is there a way to determine the correct transmission for the car based on this information? I'm not clear if a close ratio or wide ration transmission is correct
for the car.

Thanks in advance for any help!



Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 12:43 PM
  #2  
jim lockwood's Avatar
jim lockwood
Race Director
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 60 Days
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 15,468
Likes: 8,948
From: northern california
C2 of Year Finalist (track prepared) 2019
Default

Neither of those plates will reveal the original transmission. Instead look at (and post) the engine pad to determine the engine assembly code. That will give you a clue.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 12:48 PM
  #3  
Kartman01's Avatar
Kartman01
Thread Starter
Intermediate
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 38
Likes: 11
From: Stevensville, MI
Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
Neither of those plates will reveal the original transmission. Instead look at (and post) the engine pad to determine the engine assembly code. That will give you a clue.
Thanks Jim... will do
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 12:50 PM
  #4  
Kartman01's Avatar
Kartman01
Thread Starter
Intermediate
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 38
Likes: 11
From: Stevensville, MI
Default

Originally Posted by jim lockwood
Neither of those plates will reveal the original transmission. Instead look at (and post) the engine pad to determine the engine assembly code. That will give you a clue.
Thanks Jim... will do

Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 01:42 PM
  #5  
TAlvarez's Avatar
TAlvarez
Drifting
Community Builder
Photogenic
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 996
From: Sacramento, Ca
Default

The HH suffix on your engine stamp would indicate an L76 / 365HP engine. So very likely the transmission was an M 21 Muncie. Also, I believe the casting number on the transmission should be 3851325.

Ted
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 01:50 PM
  #6  
dcamick's Avatar
dcamick
Le Mans Master
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,394
Likes: 2,769
From: Pittsburgh
2024 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C1 of Year Finalist (appearance mods)
Default

You might want to talk to this Member:

https://www.corvetteforum.com/forums...re-muncie.html
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 01:54 PM
  #7  
Easy Rhino's Avatar
Easy Rhino
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Photoriffic
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31,800
Likes: 2,397
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
Default

Originally Posted by TAlvarez
The HH suffix on your engine stamp would indicate an L76 / 365HP engine. So very likely the transmission was an M 21 Muncie. Also, I believe the casting number on the transmission should be 3851325.

Ted
Agree with this. My L76/365HP '65 built 389 units before the OP's 65 has the matching drivetrain. It's a close ratio Muncie 4-speed, aka the M21.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 02:00 PM
  #8  
ruxvette's Avatar
ruxvette
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,896
Likes: 5,363
From: T-Town WA
2016 C6 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by Easy Rhino
Agree with this. My L76/365HP '65 built 389 units before the OP's 65 has the matching drivetrain. It's a close ratio Muncie 4-speed, aka the M21.
Curious...my Black Book does not show M21 as an option until 1966. Am I missing something?
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 02:12 PM
  #9  
Easy Rhino's Avatar
Easy Rhino
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Photoriffic
Loved
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31,800
Likes: 2,397
From: Middle TN by way of KY, OH, VA, IL, CA, FL, NY, SC, HI
Default

Originally Posted by ruxvette
Curious...my Black Book does not show M21 as an option until 1966. Am I missing something?
I don't think that you are 'missing something.' I think that the official factory use of M21 to denote the close ratio Muncie 4 speed was more or less 'official' but someone that tracks these things can clarify this. That's why I used the term 'aka.'
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 02:41 PM
  #10  
DZAUTO's Avatar
DZAUTO
Race Director
Veteran: Army
25 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,634
Likes: 4,684
From: Mustang OK
2026 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2025 c1 of the Year - Modified Winner
2024 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by ruxvette
Curious...my Black Book does not show M21 as an option until 1966. Am I missing something?
Are you missing something?
Yes and no.
For the 1963-65 model years, THERE WAS ONLY ONE OPTION FOR THE 4sp. It was M20, PERIOD.
The FACTORY------NOT THE CUSTOMER-------determined if the Muncie was a wide or close ratio. This determination by the factory was dependent on engine option and rearend gear ratio. LATER TO BE REFERRED TO AS M20 OR M21 beginning in 1966
Then, beginning with the 1966 model year, the 4sp options became M20, M21, M22.
And, speaking of M22, A VERY SMALL handful of M22 Muncies were installed later in the 65 model year. These were installed behind the very hi-perf engines, such as the solid lifter SB and the 425hp/396. Information and documentation on the few 65 M22s which were installed is very sketchy.

Last edited by DZAUTO; Feb 16, 2024 at 03:38 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 03:07 PM
  #11  
Vitaminmopar's Avatar
Vitaminmopar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 480
From: Colorado Springs CO
Default

DZAuto is correct the factory determined the transmission used based on the rear differential ratio. For example with the HH engine code, if your rear ratio is 3:36 the car would have received the M20, if car had 3:70 rear then the factory would have installed M21. Identify the differential ratio your car has from the date and code letters stamped into the differential's bottom ID pad. To confirm the ratio you will need to have the rear wheels off the ground and count the number of revolutions the drive shaft turns to one revolution of the rear wheels.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 03:07 PM
  #12  
JohnnyRay's Avatar
JohnnyRay
Racer
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 345
Likes: 93
Default

So...in 1965, what did they put behind the L79? M20 or M21?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 04:10 PM
  #13  
DZAUTO's Avatar
DZAUTO
Race Director
Veteran: Army
25 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,634
Likes: 4,684
From: Mustang OK
2026 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2025 c1 of the Year - Modified Winner
2024 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyRay
So...in 1965, what did they put behind the L79? M20 or M21?
Again, it would depend on rearend gear ratio.
With a high gear rearend ratio, such as 3.08, 3.36. it most likely got a wide ratio Muncie NOT an M20 specifically.
If it got a low gear ratio, such as a 3.70, 4,11, it normally got a close ratio Muncie, NOT an M21.
Back then, CLOSE and WIDE ratio is the way Muncies were referred to. NOT, repeat, NOT M20 or M21.
I don't know how to explain it any better.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 05:38 PM
  #14  
Vitaminmopar's Avatar
Vitaminmopar
Burning Brakes
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 480
From: Colorado Springs CO
Default

Maybe the 1965 Chevrolet power team listing will help clear this up.



Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 05:40 PM
  #15  
JohnnyRay's Avatar
JohnnyRay
Racer
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 345
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
Again, it would depend on rearend gear ratio.
With a high gear rearend ratio, such as 3.08, 3.36. it most likely got a wide ratio Muncie NOT an M20 specifically.
If it got a low gear ratio, such as a 3.70, 4,11, it normally got a close ratio Muncie, NOT an M21.
Back then, CLOSE and WIDE ratio is the way Muncies were referred to. NOT, repeat, NOT M20 or M21.
I don't know how to explain it any better.
Below are the born with specs for the diff and transmission as puled from the stampings. From your description, it sounds like mine has a wide ratio - but I never would guess it by the feel of 1st thru 3rd...
Muncie M2? transmission – 3851325 stamped P05 12 (May 12th 1965) SN S117792
Differential – 3876476-N stamped (A)M5 14 05 (May 14th 1965, 3.36, posi (rebuilt as 3.55 posi)

Last edited by JohnnyRay; Feb 16, 2024 at 05:46 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 06:57 PM
  #16  
DZAUTO's Avatar
DZAUTO
Race Director
Veteran: Army
25 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,634
Likes: 4,684
From: Mustang OK
2026 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2025 c1 of the Year - Modified Winner
2024 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyRay
Below are the born with specs for the diff and transmission as puled from the stampings. From your description, it sounds like mine has a wide ratio - but I never would guess it by the feel of 1st thru 3rd...
Muncie M2? transmission – 3851325 stamped P05 12 (May 12th 1965) SN S117792
Differential – 3876476-N stamped (A)M5 14 05 (May 14th 1965, 3.36, posi (rebuilt as 3.55 posi)
For 63-68 models---------IF THE TRANSMISSION IS IN THE CAR-----------there is NOTHING on the outside of the transmission which indicates wide or close ratio.
For the same years, ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Muncies used the same case, regardless of wide/close ratio or M20, M21, M22. Just one example, ALL 1967 Muncies (M20-M21-M22) used the same case with the same casting number, 3885010. Same for tail housings and same for side covers.
Thus, pull the transmission and look at the input shaft-------------------------MAYBE, MAYBE, MAYBE! FROM THE FACTORY, 63-65 wide ration Muncie input shafts had NO grooves on the input shaft. Close ratio had ONE groove. REMEMBER, WE'RE TALKING ORIGINAL FACTORY CONFIGURATION.
The 1966-74 M20 (wide ratio) Muncies had 2 grooves on the input shaft.
The 66-74 M21 Muncies (close ratio) had 1 groove on the input shaft.
The 66-74 M22 Muncies (heavy duty/rock crusher) had NO grooves.
Again, the above were FACTORY configuration.
BUT, if the gears were busted, or teeth broken off, A REPLACEMENT INPUT SHAFT USUALLY did not have any grooves.
Thus, that finally brings us to the question "How do you SURE FIRE determine what you actually have inside your Muncie case. Super simple, pull the side cover and check the tooth count of the gears.+



Frequently, unknowledgeable (or unscrupulous) people will try to pass off an M20 or M21 as an M22. If it has 1 or 2 grooves, run forest, run!
And, if it has no grooves, that DOES NOT necessarily indicate that it is an M22. It could be a rebuilt M20 or M21 that got a replacement input shaft.
AGAIN, the ONLY way to tell is remove the side cover and look at the gears. The angle of the teeth in an M22 are at a lesser angle than M20/M21 teeth, as below.






Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 07:11 PM
  #17  
ruxvette's Avatar
ruxvette
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,896
Likes: 5,363
From: T-Town WA
2016 C6 of Year Finalist
Default

I am always impressed with the knowledge (and the knowledge sharing) of the folks on the forum.
So, in (early) 1963 it was a BW 4spd to change later to Muncie with no named identity per se.
I find it funny/not funny the factory determined what trans (wide/close) the customer wanted based on engine HP.
My 66 has a 300HP and 4 speed. It dops about 600 rpm per gear, thus I assumed it was a close ratio. I guess I need to roll my ol' fat body under the car to see what numbers are on it to see if it was born with it.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Help Determining Correct Transmission

Old Feb 16, 2024 | 08:33 PM
  #18  
DZAUTO's Avatar
DZAUTO
Race Director
Veteran: Army
25 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,634
Likes: 4,684
From: Mustang OK
2026 Corvette of the Year Finalist - Modified
2025 c1 of the Year - Modified Winner
2024 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2023 C1 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2015 C1 of the Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by ruxvette
I am always impressed with the knowledge (and the knowledge sharing) of the folks on the forum.
So, in (early) 1963 it was a BW 4spd to change later to Muncie with no named identity per se.
I find it funny/not funny the factory determined what trans (wide/close) the customer wanted based on engine HP.
My 66 has a 300HP and 4 speed. It dops about 600 rpm per gear, thus I assumed it was a close ratio. I guess I need to roll my ol' fat body under the car to see what numbers are on it to see if it was born with.
And AGAIN. If the transmission is in the car, for 63-68 models, there is NOTHING on the outside of the case that identifies if it is a close or wide ratio.
Remember, on ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 63-65 Muncies, they were only M20.

Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 10:15 PM
  #19  
ruxvette's Avatar
ruxvette
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
Veteran: Navy
15 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,896
Likes: 5,363
From: T-Town WA
2016 C6 of Year Finalist
Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
And AGAIN. If the transmission is in the car, for 63-68 models, there is NOTHING on the outside of the case that identifies if it is a close or wide ratio.
Remember, on ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 63-65 Muncies, they were only M20.
By jove, I think I've got it.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2024 | 11:21 PM
  #20  
JohnnyRay's Avatar
JohnnyRay
Racer
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2023
Posts: 345
Likes: 93
Default

Originally Posted by DZAUTO
For 63-68 models---------IF THE TRANSMISSION IS IN THE CAR-----------there is NOTHING on the outside of the transmission which indicates wide or close ratio.
For the same years, ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Muncies used the same case, regardless of wide/close ratio or M20, M21, M22. Just one example, ALL 1967 Muncies (M20-M21-M22) used the same case with the same casting number, 3885010. Same for tail housings and same for side covers.
Thus, pull the transmission and look at the input shaft-------------------------MAYBE, MAYBE, MAYBE! FROM THE FACTORY, 63-65 wide ration Muncie input shafts had NO grooves on the input shaft. Close ratio had ONE groove. REMEMBER, WE'RE TALKING ORIGINAL FACTORY CONFIGURATION.
The 1966-74 M20 (wide ratio) Muncies had 2 grooves on the input shaft.
The 66-74 M21 Muncies (close ratio) had 1 groove on the input shaft.
The 66-74 M22 Muncies (heavy duty/rock crusher) had NO grooves.
Again, the above were FACTORY configuration.
BUT, if the gears were busted, or teeth broken off, A REPLACEMENT INPUT SHAFT USUALLY did not have any grooves.
Thus, that finally brings us to the question "How do you SURE FIRE determine what you actually have inside your Muncie case. Super simple, pull the side cover and check the tooth count of the gears.+

Frequently, unknowledgeable (or unscrupulous) people will try to pass off an M20 or M21 as an M22. If it has 1 or 2 grooves, run forest, run!
And, if it has no grooves, that DOES NOT necessarily indicate that it is an M22. It could be a rebuilt M20 or M21 that got a replacement input shaft.
AGAIN, the ONLY way to tell is remove the side cover and look at the gears. The angle of the teeth in an M22 are at a lesser angle than M20/M21 teeth, as below.
Thanks DZ! Consider us well schooled on this topic now. Amazing amount of clarity shared here!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE