When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi all. Really appreciate how helpful everyone is on the forum. Came across this original 1966 C2 L79. Owner had it for 20 years and has original sale sheet from 66. However engine stamp looks different from others I’ve seen, particularly the 8. It’s also stamped at a slight angle versus the vin. Curious for anyone’s thoughts. Really appreciate the help.
the assembly stamp was stamped at the Flint plant. while the vin stamp was done at St Louis after it was assigned the car. to me the "T' looks off. but I'll let others chime in. do you have good clear pictures of the paper work?
And pray tell how do you know which stamps are real.Blocks have been restamped since the 70'S.
that's a very good question and be best answered by the guy who ask you to pay for his services on that that has thousands of stamp pad pictures on file
I have no problem with that pad. The surface looks good, as does the stamping. I have no problem with the "0" and "O", they are known to have been interchanged for each other in stampings, just as "1" and "I" were often interchanged and "6" and "9" were often inverted to be used for the other. The "8" is a little funky, but I think there were a couple different fonts used too.
No expert but I follow these posts with curiosity and rarely comment. When this question comes up I always look at/for the broach marks first. Are there clean, parallel broach paths and do they continue thru the stampings. To me that’s the first clue to originality. Then if really motivated get the book out on the letter shapes…rarely that interested. These broach paths are awfully faint. Hints and learer around the VIN. I’d at least ask for another picture from other angles, then go to the stamp book if serious before paying for an expert. Larry
And pray tell how do you know which stamps are real.Blocks have been restamped since the 70'S.
If you have multiple examples from the same day the characters, flaws, and spacing should be the same. Even a few days apart will have the same F, month and possibly one or two characters for the day.
I envision a tray of characters (mixed fonts with various stages of wear) that the gang holder was loaded from. The person changing the gang stamps just picked out, say a random 0 character from the compartment. That's why you can have two differently shaped 0s. The individual blocks can also have wear on the sides such that they sit crooked compared to their neighboring blocks. That's where seeing other examples from the same time period is the gold-standard for determining authenticity.
Just to add an example and an endearing quirk to this: My '67 (and others here on the forum) have an upside down 8 in their VIN (from #18,000+).
Last edited by barkingrats; Feb 1, 2025 at 06:23 PM.
No expert but I follow these posts with curiosity and rarely comment. When this question comes up I always look at/for the broach marks first. Are there clean, parallel broach paths and do they continue thru the stampings. To me that’s the first clue to originality. Then if really motivated get the book out on the letter shapes…rarely that interested. These broach paths are awfully faint. Hints and learer around the VIN. I’d at least ask for another picture from other angles, then go to the stamp book if serious before paying for an expert. Larry
The lighting angle here is pretty harshly over-head which will wash out texture.
I have long wondered about the broach marks over time. I understand the broaching machine was huge with many multiples of engines going through at a time, but they must have had down-time to dress or change the broaches. As the broaches wear, the blocks are going to exhibit a different, heavier scratch pattern than when the broaches had new edges yielding finer lines.
I actually was able to find a close vin engine stamp on C2registry. Definitely some similarities. The 3 the I the F the O. The H is a little different.
I actually was able to find a close vin engine stamp on C2registry. Definitely some similarities. The 3 the I the F the O. The H is a little different.
I believe they had multiple gang stamps set up for the different engine codes, and, being that they had to remove the engine code (HE) when the date changed, it's plausible to me the guy pulled another random H from the bin.
If you're curious about the small-block production, here's a great write-up by John Hinckley, who was there and is a widely respected authority on Chevrolet processes. Unfortunately he died just a couple years ago, but he wrote many articles and answered many forum questions here and on the Camaro sites.
Keep in mind the interwweb is full of engine stamp pictures. You need to be sure what you are comparing to is a REAL stamping, otherwise................
I actually was able to find a close vin engine stamp on C2registry. Definitely some similarities. The 3 the I the F the O. The H is a little different.
Let me add that the VIN stamps were done days or weeks after the engine stamps -- and at a completely different location. Two engines can have sequential VINs but have engine assembly code stamps days/weeks apart. For direct comparison, you'd be looking to find engine assembly stamp pics with the same date and engine option.
Thoyer brings up a good point that a single comparison stamp pic won't offer much if there are any significant differences because you won't know which is the genuine stamping, if either. However, if the match between the two is nearly identical with similar characteristics, they're both likely authentic. (Two restamps looking the same would be pretty difficult to pull off unless done by the same forger.)
Cast date on the block / Vin on the frame if it has one and the production date of the car. That can narrow down the authenticity as well. I think its a bad restamping job.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.