When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
this can't be the case here its well documented like what Don said in post 16 that the 962 block can be safely bored over
I agree 100%. I was just pointing out that casting numbers do get doctored - which does not apply to the block in question as it has a 396 casting number.
with your help I think I’ve come up with a logical explanation for my mystery block.
.......
The fact that my block is a virgin 427 has not been in question in my mind because after two machine shops inspected, measured, and determined it is a 427 I had it sonic tested for cylinder wall thickness, (besides passing the pencil test) and the measurements confirmed it is a 427.
Apparently you have not considered the possibility that the 3855962 blocks were cast with thick cylinder walls? Before you get too excited about it, maybe you could do the pencil test on a bunch of other early 396 blocks with this casting number, and see if they also have the same thick cylinder walls. Maybe it's not as one-off as you think?
If I had the block, and a car that needed a 427 (or a 396 or a 454), I'd use it, and have fun driving around with a powerful engine.
but it is neat to see how folks can create wonderful narratives to explain things that have other more rational explanations.
I'm anxious to see what we learn from the numbers. A full breakdown on a block like this will be invaluable for people doing forum searches later. I'm confident that the knowledgeable members will be able to explain every character on the block.
I'm anxious to see what we learn from the numbers. A full breakdown on a block like this will be invaluable for people doing forum searches later. I'm confident that the knowledgeable members will be able to explain every character on the block.
there is not much to debate. the op post the block casting number of 962 which was cast from 1965 to very early 1966 that was four bolt main 396 used for solid lifter and early 396-360 engines in Chevelles the op posted the stamp pad of T1007EJ, 6Z08727 which is a 396/360 with K19, and manual trans built at the Freemont Ca assembly plant from a Chevelle assembled on Oct 7 1965. the vin of the car is for a car built the second week of Nov of 65. I would put the block casting date late sept of 65. this all jives and is correct but that is all on how the engine was in the fall of 1965.
The EJ in T1007EJ makes it a 396 cid / 360hp Chevelle with a manual transmission. It is either a "virgin 396" block or just another block that got bored to 427. Those are the only two options. Whether OP decides to accept it or not is irrelevant.
My bet would be that he has a 396 block that has been bored to a 427. Machine shops aren't likely to research numbers, they are going to take a measurement - that is likely why they are telling him he has a 427 block. I doubt anyone could verify or say for sure if it was a virgin block that came from the factory that way but if in fact it did come from the factory that way, I would bet it is a GM machine shop boo-boo that some employee rescued from the scrap pile.
My bet would be that he has a 396 block that has been bored to a 427. Machine shops aren't likely to research numbers, they are going to take a measurement - that is likely why they are telling him he has a 427 block. I doubt anyone could verify or say for sure if it was a virgin block that came from the factory that way but if in fact it did come from the factory that way, I would bet it is a GM machine shop boo-boo that some employee rescued from the scrap pile.
it wouldn't have been shipped via rail from NY to Ca and put in a car if it was a boo boo. It's as much of a virgin is a woman found in a bed at the maternity ward at your local hospital
it wouldn't have been shipped via rail from NY to Ca and put in a car if it was a boo boo. It's as much of a virgin is a woman found in a bed at the maternity ward at your local hospital
I deal with 3 machine shop/engine builders and none of them do anything but address the casting number, date, and measure and assess the condition of the block, never do they claim original bore, other than by diameter. I would be interested to know if the valve relief setting on a 396 block would be the same as a 427. Can't see why it wouldn't, as the heads are the same per valve size. Never heard a variance of the relief in a 2.07/172 to a 2.19/172 to a 2.19/1.88 application, but I'd suspect they're all the same. Meanning the setup tooling would be the same, the bigger bore would just knock more of the big end away.
it wouldn't have been shipped via rail from NY to Ca and put in a car if it was a boo boo. It's as much of a virgin is a woman found in a bed at the maternity ward at your local hospital
When I read "virgin block" I assumed it was never assembled - as I'm reading this, I'm guessing that by "virgin" he just means he believes it wasn't machined? I agree with you that an anomaly block is not going to make the journey from machine shop to assembly plant.
there is not much to debate. the op post the block casting number of 962 which was cast from 1965 to very early 1966 that was four bolt main 396 used for solid lifter and early 396-360 engines in Chevelles the op posted the stamp pad of T1007EJ, 6Z08727 which is a 396/360 with K19, and manual trans built at the Freemont Ca assembly plant from a Chevelle assembled on Oct 7 1965. the vin of the car is for a car built the second week of Nov of 65. I would put the block casting date late sept of 65. this all jives and is correct but that is all on how the engine was in the fall of 1965.
if you think I am advocating any possibility of this block being originally a 427, you are mistaken. I am am not suggesting there's a debate to be made on the nature of this block.
I have said repeatedly that this discussion can be valuable, but I do not in any way mean that it is valuable in proclaiming this "427" a legit factory 427. It can have value in demonstrating how to use facts to run down the truth about an engine that any one of use might finds in a C2 without having to guess or take somebody's word for it..
if you think I am advocating any possibility of this block being originally a 427, you are mistaken. I am am not suggesting there's a debate to be made on the nature of this block.
I have said repeatedly that this discussion can be valuable, but I do not in any way mean that it is valuable in proclaiming this "427" a legit factory 427. It can have value in demonstrating how to use facts to run down the truth about an engine that any one of use might finds in a C2 without having to guess or take somebody's word for it..
this is a classic text book case on how to decode a Chevy block. Now this only applies on how it left GM assembly plants 60 years ago. What past owners and machine shops did is anyone's guess But there is no need to make up stories on it. This is like watching History Chanel's documentary's on Hitter after the bunker. Hell I think he want to the moon with JFK and his brother in 69 and not Armstrong and is living there in a village. If we want to make up stuff let's go all out
this is a classic text book case on how to decode a Chevy block. Now this only applies on how it left GM assembly plants 60 years ago. What past owners and machine shops did is anyone's guess But there is no need to make up stories on it. This is like watching History Chanel's documentary's on Hitter after the bunker. Hell I think he want to the moon with JFK and his brother in 69 and not Armstrong and is living there in a village. If we want to make up stuff let's go all out
Agreed. You don't need to convince me LOL
But this is exactly why the thread will have value.
2025 C2 of the Year ('64-'66) Finalist - Unmodified
2025 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2025 C4 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2024 C4 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2023 C2 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C4 of the Year Finalist- Modified
2022 C4 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2022 C3 of the Year Finalist - Modified
2021 C7 of the Year Winner -- Modified
2020 C4 of the Year Finalist - Modified
So somebody pulled out an engine from a Chevelle (early in life) had it disassembled bored and set aside for 60 years. maybe got drafted and never got back to complete project of more power. No way its virgin if it was assembled at one time
So somebody pulled out an engine from a Chevelle (early in life) had it disassembled bored and set aside for 60 years. maybe got drafted and never got back to complete project of more power. No way its virgin if it was assembled at one time
wonder what the cost of buying a brand new 427 bare block from Chevy vs having a machine shop bore a 396 out?
wonder what the cost of buying a brand new 427 bare block from Chevy vs having a machine shop bore a 396 out?
Problem is you need to use the "thick walled" 396 blocks if you want to punch out a 396 to a 427. I believe the 4 bolt main blocks had the thicker cylinder walls, otherwise the cylinder wall becomes very thin and you run the possibility of poor cooling and the cylinder wall cracking. Not saying it can't be done, but.........
Cant see it being of any particular interest to Corvette restorers.
that link is a search page, if you were trying to link to a specific item, it doesn't....
perhaps try again please?
or take a screen shot, so we can see what you see? ebay search is pretty useless these days, they show you a whole bunch of things that are NOT what you are searching for.
The block is not a Virgin 427 It's an alien 427 the reason being is it dose not exist. Nothing special just your common bored over and probably to much 396. Priceless? Nope 300-500