When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have the ZZ502 crate engine in my 69. I am wondering what I can do to increase performance in it. I don't want to go as far as camshaft change, but I'm talking more like better carburetor, intake manifold, ect.
How much do you need? 502 horsepower is not enough? Are you racing or driving on the street? I wonder if the money might be well spent on beefing up the driveline. If your car was originally a small block that is where I would put it. If it is a big block originally I would probably put it there as well, as that much hp and torque might lay waste to older ring and pinion. Have you a solid automatic or 4 speed behind that motor as well?
How about a good exhaust such as Hooker Headers w/ spiral turbo baffles. I would also upgrade the ignition to an MSD 6AL & MSD distributor, if you have not done so already. If you want to go deeper at a later time, I would replace the heads with AFR, Dart or Pro Topline aluminum heads along with a better cam and intake.
We have ZZ502 in our 69 Camaro and just got through with a few upgrades to it:
1). Beehive valve springs and roller rockers.
2). Pretty good sized hydraulic roller cam.
3). MSD 6AL, MSD coil, and MSD non HEI dist.
4). We also pulled the heads, checked compression (was actually 9.8 instead of the 9.6 advertised) and upped it a tad.
If I had ONE item I would recommend as an easy upgrade it would be the beehive springs and the roller rockers. You will definitely pick up good power, but more importantly you will pick up RPM. The 502 has a factory 'redline' of 5,800 and this is where the valves would start to float. We can now run up to 6,500 and the car pulls strong all the way there.
Giving yourself an extra 700 RPM's up top would make your ride that much more of a monster on the big end.
What about the Edelbrock Multiport fuel injection kit. It's suppose to add about 20 to 30 horsepower, What about roller rockers??? ZZ502 with Performer RPM pro-flo
We have ZZ502 in our 69 Camaro and just got through with a few upgrades to it: 1). Beehive valve springs and roller rockers.
2). Pretty good sized hydraulic roller cam.
3). MSD 6AL, MSD coil, and MSD non HEI dist.
4). We also pulled the heads, checked compression (was actually 9.8 instead of the 9.6 advertised) and upped it a tad.
If I had ONE item I would recommend as an easy upgrade it would be the beehive springs and the roller rockers. You will definitely pick up good power, but more importantly you will pick up RPM. The 502 has a factory 'redline' of 5,800 and this is where the valves would start to float. We can now run up to 6,500 and the car pulls strong all the way there.
Giving yourself an extra 700 RPM's up top would make your ride that much more of a monster on the big end.
Enjoy it.
Bryan
..... "SUPPOSE", just "SUPPOSE", a guy wanted to bracket-race a fairly-stock ZZ502, in a low 12-second car, without swapping the cam/lifters/headers.....
would the valve springs and roller-rockers produce that much more RPM, and reliability, with the OEM cam?
I'm not doubtin' ya, just asking, as I've seen them run, but not known what's been done to them.
I would estimate that those extra revs will produce at least lengthen the powerband enough to make a significant difference. It all adds up. Think of it this way; pretend you are in 2nd gear. At your new shift point you will be going faster, which translates into being higher in the rpm's when you shift into 3rd. When you shift into 3rd your car will be in an rpm range where it is putting out much more hp because it will be revving higher at this point.
I'm not-really concerned with the extra HP/TQ the valve-springs/rockers may produce (although they'd be nice ):
when the original 440HP/502CID was introduced in the mid/late '90s, I recall a few bracket-racers claiming that the hydraulic lifters and/or valve-springs often failed after a 100 passes, and they lost several hundred RPM as a result.
I ain't worried about Low ET, just a reliable, consistent, zero-maintenance low-RPM stump-puller that'll last several hundred, if-not several thousand, runs with a 5500 RPM shift/trap speeds.