Is the 1982 crossfire vette more desirable!!
#1
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is the 1982 crossfire vette more desirable!!
Well lets se if any of u know wheter this year is more or less desorable to buy and why?
I mean i know of one with 89k and clean $4500 at all original.
I mean it sounds cheap.
I just wonder if this crossfire year is more problematic generally
is that years more or less troublesome than other vettes.
what deficiencies if any compared to others ?
I mean i know of one with 89k and clean $4500 at all original.
I mean it sounds cheap.
I just wonder if this crossfire year is more problematic generally
is that years more or less troublesome than other vettes.
what deficiencies if any compared to others ?
#2
Instructor
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Bardstown Ky
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CrossFires have been praised by some, and cussed by others.
as for me,, I've had mine for going-on 10 years now, and have NOT EVER had a "CrossFire" related problem. period. na~da. (@ 105,000 mi.)
I have had the usual run-of-the-mill late~production C3 woes with brake calipers leaking, cheap interiors, some wiring issues,, and so on,
but other than that
as far as "will they ever be worth anything" ?
who knows for sure ?
I wish I could answer that one for myself, coz a hard-hitting cam and some burn-out tire smoke would sure make for a l'il bit of Saturday night fun every now and then
as for me,, I've had mine for going-on 10 years now, and have NOT EVER had a "CrossFire" related problem. period. na~da. (@ 105,000 mi.)
I have had the usual run-of-the-mill late~production C3 woes with brake calipers leaking, cheap interiors, some wiring issues,, and so on,
but other than that
as far as "will they ever be worth anything" ?
who knows for sure ?
I wish I could answer that one for myself, coz a hard-hitting cam and some burn-out tire smoke would sure make for a l'il bit of Saturday night fun every now and then
#3
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CrossFires have been praised by some, and cussed by others.
as for me,, I've had mine for going-on 10 years now, and have NOT EVER had a "CrossFire" related problem. period. na~da. (@ 105,000 mi.)
I have had the usual run-of-the-mill late~production C3 woes with brake calipers leaking, cheap interiors, some wiring issues,, and so on,
but other than that
as far as "will they ever be worth anything" ?
who knows for sure ?
I wish I could answer that one for myself, coz a hard-hitting cam and some burn-out tire smoke would sure make for a l'il bit of Saturday night fun every now and then
as for me,, I've had mine for going-on 10 years now, and have NOT EVER had a "CrossFire" related problem. period. na~da. (@ 105,000 mi.)
I have had the usual run-of-the-mill late~production C3 woes with brake calipers leaking, cheap interiors, some wiring issues,, and so on,
but other than that
as far as "will they ever be worth anything" ?
who knows for sure ?
I wish I could answer that one for myself, coz a hard-hitting cam and some burn-out tire smoke would sure make for a l'il bit of Saturday night fun every now and then
compared with c-4 can u say anything?
#4
Melting Slicks
Look up the book value on the 82 Corvette, it is valued a little higher than a 81 Corvette AND a 84 Corvette. Not sure if that means a whole lot....but it is in print.
BTW $4500 is a steal for a clean corvette with 89k. Sometimes if it's "too good to be true"....it is.
BTW $4500 is a steal for a clean corvette with 89k. Sometimes if it's "too good to be true"....it is.
#5
CF JASOC Member
Look up the book value on the 82 Corvette, it is valued a little higher than a 81 Corvette AND a 84 Corvette. Not sure if that means a whole lot....but it is in print.
BTW $4500 is a steal for a clean corvette with 89k. Sometimes if it's "too good to be true"....it is.
BTW $4500 is a steal for a clean corvette with 89k. Sometimes if it's "too good to be true"....it is.
The higher value on '82s is for last of breed, and the fact that GM really loaded 'em up with all the creature comforts to keep sales high while we were waiting for the '83s that never came.
#6
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Alright so basically any 76-82 would be based on condition originality well kept ect as the criteria for desirability as far as the c-3's go then generaly?
#7
Melting Slicks
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Montgomery Alabama
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes
on
3 Posts
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06
I would rather have my 82 than a comparable 80 or 81 because of the overdrive transmission.
I jsut bought a 73 today, to drive while I am restoring the 82, and I already miss the overdrive...
Seriously, I do believe the 83 will be worth more money than the 80 or 81 due to the crossfire and the overdrive transmission. Whether it is mre desirable, is up to the buyer.
I jsut bought a 73 today, to drive while I am restoring the 82, and I already miss the overdrive...
Seriously, I do believe the 83 will be worth more money than the 80 or 81 due to the crossfire and the overdrive transmission. Whether it is mre desirable, is up to the buyer.
#8
Race Director
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 14,373
Received 242 Likes
on
129 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C3 of Year Finalist (stock)
I looked at a few 82's before I bought my 81. The three I drove all had driveability issues due to the fuel injection. I heard many horror stories about the issues with the crossfire systems. Having said that, I have a close friend with one that has never had any issues on a car with 80K miles so I can't say. I definately wish I had the overdrive in my 81 but I'm used to the turbo 350 now. Also, 81's were the first year of the CCM system and feedback carbs and have issues of their own. Fortunately mine runs like a top.
In any case, any decent vette with 89K miles for $4,500 sounds like a good deal to me.
In any case, any decent vette with 89K miles for $4,500 sounds like a good deal to me.
#9
Yup.. An 83 would be priceless if anyone had one Yeah... Im messing with you.. Everyone has a typo now and then.
#10
Drifting
#11
Team Owner
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 23,831
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07
http://www.corvettemagazine.com/2000...ry/83/83p1.asp
#12
Team Owner
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,470 Likes
on
1,249 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran
Good reading here; it will tell you about 82s. Most of the problematic issues with the crossfire were worked out long ago on the C4 (all the 84s had the same crossfire set up as the 82s). The 700R is their real advantage.
#13
Instructor
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Bardstown Ky
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE
compared with c-4 can u say anything?[/QUOTE]
yes.
I prefer the body~style of the '82 vs the '84.
and, to add,,
I would be very skeptical of any $4500 clean, original Corvette....
especially an '82 with all the CrossFire and emissions components in-place and functioning correctly.
compared with c-4 can u say anything?[/QUOTE]
yes.
I prefer the body~style of the '82 vs the '84.
and, to add,,
I would be very skeptical of any $4500 clean, original Corvette....
especially an '82 with all the CrossFire and emissions components in-place and functioning correctly.
#15
Advanced
Thread Starter
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes.
I prefer the body~style of the '82 vs the '84.
and, to add,,
I would be very skeptical of any $4500 clean, original Corvette....
especially an '82 with all the CrossFire and emissions components in-place and functioning correctly.[/QUOTE]
I can say plenty from what ive read , ive heard the 84 c-4 handles better, probably brakes better , probably harder riding though.
yeah the skeptical parts probably right.
i know it need rugs and seat upholstery stiching is comming apart.
calims to be 89,000 miles and it has sat for 4 years garaged though supposedly started up ran w/ no leaks and ran smooth so thats the c-3 story.
i can say that i think the 81, 84 80, 82, 79, 85, 78,77, 76, 86, are all the cheapest to buy pretty much in that order what can any of u say about that?
I prefer the body~style of the '82 vs the '84.
and, to add,,
I would be very skeptical of any $4500 clean, original Corvette....
especially an '82 with all the CrossFire and emissions components in-place and functioning correctly.[/QUOTE]
I can say plenty from what ive read , ive heard the 84 c-4 handles better, probably brakes better , probably harder riding though.
yeah the skeptical parts probably right.
i know it need rugs and seat upholstery stiching is comming apart.
calims to be 89,000 miles and it has sat for 4 years garaged though supposedly started up ran w/ no leaks and ran smooth so thats the c-3 story.
i can say that i think the 81, 84 80, 82, 79, 85, 78,77, 76, 86, are all the cheapest to buy pretty much in that order what can any of u say about that?
#17
CF JASOC Member
#18
I would never buy an '82 for one reason and one reason only, I won't buy a Corvette that isn't a manual transmission. Otherwise I'd probably rather have an '82 than my '81.
#19
Melting Slicks
The 82 is starting to gain in popularity and resto status. Mine is fairly stock looking only, the motor is a 383, but it is a CFI setup and runs well. Have had the car for over 13 years.
#20
Melting Slicks
Here's a point...... FUEL ECONOMY on the Crossfires...
I made a day-trip with 7 other Vettes last weekend (around 300 miles)...
We were only running about 62 mph (some of the guys have big-blocks!)...
For the entire trip I averaged 24.9 mpg!!!!
That's un-heard-of for a 25 year old car.....
That baby is "dialed-in" right!
I made a day-trip with 7 other Vettes last weekend (around 300 miles)...
We were only running about 62 mph (some of the guys have big-blocks!)...
For the entire trip I averaged 24.9 mpg!!!!
That's un-heard-of for a 25 year old car.....
That baby is "dialed-in" right!