C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is the 1982 crossfire vette more desirable!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2007, 04:23 PM
  #1  
corvroom
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
corvroom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Is the 1982 crossfire vette more desirable!!

Well lets se if any of u know wheter this year is more or less desorable to buy and why?
I mean i know of one with 89k and clean $4500 at all original.
I mean it sounds cheap.
I just wonder if this crossfire year is more problematic generally
is that years more or less troublesome than other vettes.
what deficiencies if any compared to others ?
Old 10-06-2007, 05:21 PM
  #2  
82Vettrin
Instructor
 
82Vettrin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Bardstown Ky
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

CrossFires have been praised by some, and cussed by others.
as for me,, I've had mine for going-on 10 years now, and have NOT EVER had a "CrossFire" related problem. period. na~da. (@ 105,000 mi.)
I have had the usual run-of-the-mill late~production C3 woes with brake calipers leaking, cheap interiors, some wiring issues,, and so on,
but other than that

as far as "will they ever be worth anything" ?
who knows for sure ?

I wish I could answer that one for myself, coz a hard-hitting cam and some burn-out tire smoke would sure make for a l'il bit of Saturday night fun every now and then
Old 10-06-2007, 05:29 PM
  #3  
corvroom
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
corvroom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 82Vettrin
CrossFires have been praised by some, and cussed by others.
as for me,, I've had mine for going-on 10 years now, and have NOT EVER had a "CrossFire" related problem. period. na~da. (@ 105,000 mi.)
I have had the usual run-of-the-mill late~production C3 woes with brake calipers leaking, cheap interiors, some wiring issues,, and so on,
but other than that

as far as "will they ever be worth anything" ?
who knows for sure ?

I wish I could answer that one for myself, coz a hard-hitting cam and some burn-out tire smoke would sure make for a l'il bit of Saturday night fun every now and then
cool no smog issues /
compared with c-4 can u say anything?
Old 10-06-2007, 06:55 PM
  #4  
1982CorvetteDude
Melting Slicks
 
1982CorvetteDude's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 2,938
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Look up the book value on the 82 Corvette, it is valued a little higher than a 81 Corvette AND a 84 Corvette. Not sure if that means a whole lot....but it is in print.

BTW $4500 is a steal for a clean corvette with 89k. Sometimes if it's "too good to be true"....it is.
Old 10-06-2007, 08:41 PM
  #5  
xCCTer
CF JASOC Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
xCCTer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Downtown Annapolis, MD. The Future is where we all have to live. Let's not screw it up.
Posts: 8,040
Received 32 Likes on 18 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by 1982CorvetteDude
Look up the book value on the 82 Corvette, it is valued a little higher than a 81 Corvette AND a 84 Corvette. Not sure if that means a whole lot....but it is in print.

BTW $4500 is a steal for a clean corvette with 89k. Sometimes if it's "too good to be true"....it is.
Use extreme caution.

The higher value on '82s is for last of breed, and the fact that GM really loaded 'em up with all the creature comforts to keep sales high while we were waiting for the '83s that never came.
Old 10-06-2007, 08:54 PM
  #6  
corvroom
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
corvroom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xccter
Use extreme caution.

The higher value on '82s is for last of breed, and the fact that GM really loaded 'em up with all the creature comforts to keep sales high while we were waiting for the '83s that never came.
Alright so basically any 76-82 would be based on condition originality well kept ect as the criteria for desirability as far as the c-3's go then generaly?
Old 10-06-2007, 11:25 PM
  #7  
Curby
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Curby's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Montgomery Alabama
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 3 Posts
Cruise-In VII Veteran
St. Jude Donor '06

Default

I would rather have my 82 than a comparable 80 or 81 because of the overdrive transmission.

I jsut bought a 73 today, to drive while I am restoring the 82, and I already miss the overdrive...

Seriously, I do believe the 83 will be worth more money than the 80 or 81 due to the crossfire and the overdrive transmission. Whether it is mre desirable, is up to the buyer.
Old 10-06-2007, 11:40 PM
  #8  
Jon Hekking
Race Director
 
Jon Hekking's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Salt Lake City Utah
Posts: 14,373
Received 242 Likes on 129 Posts
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2019 C3 of Year Finalist (stock)

Default

I looked at a few 82's before I bought my 81. The three I drove all had driveability issues due to the fuel injection. I heard many horror stories about the issues with the crossfire systems. Having said that, I have a close friend with one that has never had any issues on a car with 80K miles so I can't say. I definately wish I had the overdrive in my 81 but I'm used to the turbo 350 now. Also, 81's were the first year of the CCM system and feedback carbs and have issues of their own. Fortunately mine runs like a top.

In any case, any decent vette with 89K miles for $4,500 sounds like a good deal to me.
Old 10-06-2007, 11:58 PM
  #9  
3rd_Vette
Drifting
 
3rd_Vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Curby

Seriously, I do believe the 83 will be worth more money than the 80 or 81 due to the crossfire and the overdrive transmission. Whether it is mre desirable, is up to the buyer.
Yup.. An 83 would be priceless if anyone had one Yeah... Im messing with you.. Everyone has a typo now and then.
Old 10-07-2007, 01:46 AM
  #10  
rayluka
Drifting
 
rayluka's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2007
Location: Kingman AZ
Posts: 1,838
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3rd_Vette
Yup.. An 83 would be priceless if anyone had one Yeah... Im messing with you.. Everyone has a typo now and then.
There is one left There was a production run of about 35 cars. All were destroyed by GM except one in the Corvette Museum. So I have read
Old 10-07-2007, 02:40 AM
  #11  
I'm Batman
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
I'm Batman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 23,831
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by rayluka
There is one left There was a production run of about 35 cars. All were destroyed by GM except one in the Corvette Museum. So I have read
44 total were built on a pilot line at a cost of about $500k each. One white car is left at the museum.

http://www.corvettemagazine.com/2000...ry/83/83p1.asp
Old 10-07-2007, 10:00 AM
  #12  
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Easy Mike's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2000
Location: Southbound
Posts: 38,928
Likes: 0
Received 1,470 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Cruise-In II Veteran

Default



Good reading here; it will tell you about 82s. Most of the problematic issues with the crossfire were worked out long ago on the C4 (all the 84s had the same crossfire set up as the 82s). The 700R is their real advantage.

Old 10-07-2007, 10:28 AM
  #13  
82Vettrin
Instructor
 
82Vettrin's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2007
Location: Bardstown Ky
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE
compared with c-4 can u say anything?[/QUOTE]

yes.
I prefer the body~style of the '82 vs the '84.
and, to add,,
I would be very skeptical of any $4500 clean, original Corvette....
especially an '82 with all the CrossFire and emissions components in-place and functioning correctly.
Old 10-07-2007, 01:27 PM
  #14  
Sihler
Racer
 
Sihler's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2002
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always figured that 82's would be worth less than say an 80 L-82, weren't the 82's lightest on HP between 78 and 82? They are last of a generation though.
Old 10-07-2007, 01:47 PM
  #15  
corvroom
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
corvroom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: S.F. Ca,
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 82Vettrin
[QUOTE
compared with c-4 can u say anything?
yes.
I prefer the body~style of the '82 vs the '84.
and, to add,,
I would be very skeptical of any $4500 clean, original Corvette....
especially an '82 with all the CrossFire and emissions components in-place and functioning correctly.[/QUOTE]

I can say plenty from what ive read , ive heard the 84 c-4 handles better, probably brakes better , probably harder riding though.
yeah the skeptical parts probably right.
i know it need rugs and seat upholstery stiching is comming apart.
calims to be 89,000 miles and it has sat for 4 years garaged though supposedly started up ran w/ no leaks and ran smooth so thats the c-3 story.
i can say that i think the 81, 84 80, 82, 79, 85, 78,77, 76, 86, are all the cheapest to buy pretty much in that order what can any of u say about that?
Old 10-07-2007, 04:07 PM
  #16  
I'm Batman
Team Owner
Support Corvetteforum!
 
I'm Batman's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: Springfield MO
Posts: 23,831
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
St. Jude Donor '07

Default

Originally Posted by Sihler
I always figured that 82's would be worth less than say an 80 L-82, weren't the 82's lightest on HP between 78 and 82? They are last of a generation though.
That distinction is held by the 165hp 1975 L48. The Cross-Fire 82 was rated at 200hp.
Old 10-07-2007, 06:01 PM
  #17  
xCCTer
CF JASOC Member
Support Corvetteforum!
 
xCCTer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: Downtown Annapolis, MD. The Future is where we all have to live. Let's not screw it up.
Posts: 8,040
Received 32 Likes on 18 Posts
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11

Default

Originally Posted by I'm Batman
That distinction is held by the 165hp 1975 L48. The Cross-Fire 82 was rated at 200hp.


Get notified of new replies

To Is the 1982 crossfire vette more desirable!!

Old 10-07-2007, 06:06 PM
  #18  
skeptic
Racer
 
skeptic's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Keizer OR
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would never buy an '82 for one reason and one reason only, I won't buy a Corvette that isn't a manual transmission. Otherwise I'd probably rather have an '82 than my '81.
Old 10-07-2007, 08:27 PM
  #19  
Buccaneer
Melting Slicks

 
Buccaneer's Avatar
 
Member Since: Nov 2005
Location: Arizona - If you don’t know CFI, STOP proliferating the myths around it...
Posts: 3,228
Received 1,015 Likes on 694 Posts

Default

The 82 is starting to gain in popularity and resto status. Mine is fairly stock looking only, the motor is a 383, but it is a CFI setup and runs well. Have had the car for over 13 years.
Old 10-08-2007, 09:00 AM
  #20  
Luster
Melting Slicks
 
Luster's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Lee's Summit MO
Posts: 2,074
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Here's a point...... FUEL ECONOMY on the Crossfires...

I made a day-trip with 7 other Vettes last weekend (around 300 miles)...

We were only running about 62 mph (some of the guys have big-blocks!)...

For the entire trip I averaged 24.9 mpg!!!!

That's un-heard-of for a 25 year old car.....

That baby is "dialed-in" right!


Quick Reply: Is the 1982 crossfire vette more desirable!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 PM.