C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

*** Date code question***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2010 | 10:06 AM
  #1  
bkvette3's Avatar
bkvette3
Thread Starter
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 95
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default *** Date code question***

Good day. Is it possible for a part on an engine, for example - alt, starter, etc to precede the final build date of the engine by just a couple of days??? Would that be excepted as correct within the NCRS judging circles??? Also, paired items like cylinder heads or exhaust manifolds - do they have to have dates that are relatively close to each other or did the factory install with dates that were maybe 2 months apart??? Your opinions appreciated. Thanks in advance. BK3

Last edited by bkvette3; May 2, 2010 at 11:06 AM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 11:08 AM
  #2  
Paul Borowski's Avatar
Paul Borowski
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime Gold
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 21,431
Likes: 456
From: Massillon,Ohio USA
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Cruise-In VI Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12
Default

....any of the engine accessories had to "pre-date" the engine assembly date or they were replaced after the engine was built. This would include the alt, dist, water pump, carb. Your heads, intake manifold, exhaust manifolds also had to "pre-date" the engine assembly date. I remember judging some '77s for example where the engine assembly date was ONE day after the block was cast. Exhaust manifolds, intakes & heads were generally about 2wks to a month prior to engine assembly date. In probably most of the '73-'82 Corvettes I had judged.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #3  
bkvette3's Avatar
bkvette3
Thread Starter
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 95
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Borowski
....any of the engine accessories had to "pre-date" the engine assembly date or they were replaced after the engine was built. This would include the alt, dist, water pump, carb. Your heads, intake manifold, exhaust manifolds also had to "pre-date" the engine assembly date. I remember judging some '77s for example where the engine assembly date was ONE day after the block was cast. Exhaust manifolds, intakes & heads were generally about 2wks to a month prior to engine assembly date. In probably most of the '73-'82 Corvettes I had judged.
Hi Paul,

Here's an example:

engine block casting date: Jan.29

engine build date of Feb.21

cylinder heads: Left - Jan.2 & Right - Feb.19

Was it possible the factory installed both heads with dates far apart (5-6 weeks apart)???

Was it possible to have cylinder heads installed when it was cast just 2 days prior to the final engine build date??? Thanks.

Last edited by bkvette3; May 2, 2010 at 12:20 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #4  
Alan 71's Avatar
Alan 71
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Influencer
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 31,168
Likes: 4,244
From: Westminster Maryland
Default

Hi bk3,
I'll let Paul respond to your latest questions.
I've found that the dates can be very close or far apart on the same engine and car.
For example, on my 71, 350/270, the block was cast Dec.31, 1970. The engine was built on Jan.7, 1971. The car was built on January 14, 1971. The intake has an August 1970 date. (Must have been in the bottom of the shipping crate!) The carburetor and alternator have a date of Jan.7,1971 ( the day the engine was built). This is surprising at first... until you remember that those parts were put on the engine in St.Louis, not at Flint where the engine was built. So they had a week to get to St. Louis.
We need to try to think about WHERE and HOW the car and it's parts were built when we start looking at dates.
It's BIG fun.
Regards,
Alan

Last edited by Alan 71; May 2, 2010 at 12:08 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #5  
bkvette3's Avatar
bkvette3
Thread Starter
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 95
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Alan 71
Hi bk3,
I'll let Paul respond to your latest questions.
I've found that the dates can be very close or far apart on the same engine and car.
For example, on my 71, 350/270, the block was cast Dec.31, 1970. The engine was built on Jan.7, 1971. The car was built on January 14, 1971. The intake has an August 1970 date. (Must have been in the bottom of the shipping crate!) The carburetor and alternator have a date of Jan.7,1971 ( the day the engine was built). This is surprising at first... until you remember that those parts were put on the engine in St.Louis, not at Flint where the engine was built. So they had a week to get to St. Louis.
We need to try to think about WHERE and HOW the car and it's parts were built when we start looking at dates.
It's BIG fun.
Regards,
Alan
Thanks Alan. That is very . I find the Corvette numbers game very interesting. I am a Vette numbers guy. Keeps me awake @ night sometimes!!! LOL

Last edited by bkvette3; May 2, 2010 at 12:30 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:33 PM
  #6  
Ravine Speed's Avatar
Ravine Speed
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 1
From: No longer in Heaven
Default

My 427 block was cast on Sept 4, 1968, engine build date was September 6, 1968, my heads are May 20, 1968 and June 18, 1968, my 3 carbs are dated June 1968 and August 1968, my distributor is June 18, 1968 and body tag shows build date of September 13, 1968. So chronologically, my heads and carbs are from May, June and August although the engine was cast and built in early Sept and the car was all assembled in mid-Sept. Dates are all over the map, but the one interesting spread on mine is the short two-day spread between the block cast date and engine build date. The block must have still been warm. I do know that the engine assembly facility for big blocks was actually adjacent to the Tonowanda foundry, so it was typical to have an engine built right after its block was cast.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:34 PM
  #7  
bkvette3's Avatar
bkvette3
Thread Starter
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 95
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default

Any other examples out there of build dates of engines and related parts that are so close together (or far apart)???

Last edited by bkvette3; May 2, 2010 at 12:40 PM.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:38 PM
  #8  
bkvette3's Avatar
bkvette3
Thread Starter
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 95
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Ravine Speed
My 427 block was cast on Sept 4, 1968, engine build date was September 6, 1968, my heads are May 20, 1968 and June 18, 1968, my 3 carbs are dated June 1968 and August 1968, my distributor is June 18, 1968 and body tag shows build date of September 13, 1968. So chronologically, my heads and carbs are from May, June and August although the engine was cast and built in early Sept and the car was all assembled in mid-Sept. Dates are all over the map, but the one interesting spread on mine is the short two-day spread between the block cast date and engine build date. The block must have still been warm. I do know that the engine assembly facility for big blocks was actually adjacent to the Tonowanda foundry, so it was typical to have an engine built right after its block was cast.
Thanks Ravine Speed. Very interesting info. By the way, I love and want your car.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:45 PM
  #9  
Ravine Speed's Avatar
Ravine Speed
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 1
From: No longer in Heaven
Default

Originally Posted by bkvette3
Any other examples out there of build dates of engines and related parts that are so close together???


I've seen some others that were also close together. In my case, I attribute it to the fact that September '68 was the first month of production for the '69 model year and they were really cranking them out that first month. Also, my engine had to get from Tonawanda to St. Louis in less than 7 days, based on the trim tag showing Sept 13 build date. My VIN is 1,505, so it was very early in the production cycle. Probably one of the first L71's made in the '69 model year, since there were only 2,722 made out of 38,762. Neat stuff...
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #10  
Ravine Speed's Avatar
Ravine Speed
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 1
From: No longer in Heaven
Default

Originally Posted by bkvette3
Thanks Ravine Speed. Very interesting info. By the way, I love and want your car.

Thank you, I appreciate it...I like it too.





Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 12:56 PM
  #11  
bkvette3's Avatar
bkvette3
Thread Starter
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 95
From: Saskatchewan, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Ravine Speed
Thank you, I appreciate it...I like it too.





Let me put it this way - you are at the top of the hill - looking down.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 01:16 PM
  #12  
Mike Ward's Avatar
Mike Ward
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 15,892
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by bkvette3
Good day. Is it possible for a part on an engine, for example - alt, starter, etc to precede the final build date of the engine by just a couple of days??? Would that be excepted (sic) as correct within the NCRS judging circles???
The two examples you've picked (alternator, starter) were not on the engine when it was shipped from the engine plant to St. Louis. Therefore they can be dated after the build date of the engine, but obviously before the car build date.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #13  
Paul Borowski's Avatar
Paul Borowski
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime Gold
25 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 21,431
Likes: 456
From: Massillon,Ohio USA
2020 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Cruise-In VI Veteran
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11-'12
Default

Originally Posted by Mike Ward
The two examples you've picked (alternator, starter) were not on the engine when it was shipped from the engine plant to St. Louis. Therefore they can be dated after the build date of the engine, but obviously before the car build date.

....good catch. Didn't think about that. I'm not sure I've ever seen that, but it's entirely possible.

...I knew of a 1971 LS-5 car, original owner, perfect pad, broach marks, etc., where the car was an early LS-5 car VIN#33xx, Dec 7, 1970 build date, the 454 block was cast like April 8, '70 and the intake was like April 13, '70 and engine assembly date was near April 27, 1970, eight months old before the car was built.
Reply
Old May 2, 2010 | 09:17 PM
  #14  
joewill's Avatar
joewill
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,454
Likes: 328
From: Indy Indiana
Default

yes, i think there were 2 strikes in 69 and 70 where the assembly line was shut down and perhaps even Tonawanda for some or all of that. there was no just in time inventory system, and some failed engine assemblys came back for checkout and might sit for weeks before reconfiguring. there are exceptions to the general rules of part dating and stamping.

the question is, are the date spreads typical of cars built around that time, or is it a exception.

there are experts out there that guard this data and sell it piecemeal for big bucks as an 'authentication service'...
Reply
Old May 3, 2010 | 11:01 AM
  #15  
Easy Mike's Avatar
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 38,923
Likes: 1,481
From: Southbound
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by joewill
...i think there were 2 strikes in 69 and 70...
1969 strike began about mid April and lasted through about mid-June affecting 1969 production.

1970 strike began about mid-September and ended just before Thanksgiving affecting 1971 model production.

My fiancee's original '71 has engine dates of early September before the strike. We estimate the car would have had a mid-September build date if things has progressed normally.

Trim tag shows 12/3/70 due to the strike.

Reply

Get notified of new replies

To *** Date code question***





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.

story-0
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-3
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-7
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE