L86 vs LT1
Melting Slicks
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 12
From: Frederick Maryland
That can depend on a lot of things...what year LT-1? Three years of production and three different horsepower ratings. Rear axle ratios can be different as well.
Let's say 1970 LT-1...370hp and against a '69 L68...400hp. Not a whole lot of difference at gross hp ratings. The LT-1 weighs less, the 427 will put out more torque, so it's quickness against pure torque...which one?
The LT-1 is a solid lifter engine...the L68 is hydraulic so the small block should wind out higher...maybe higher top ends.
The LT-1 is a high revver and lives for high rpm's. The L68 is more low end and mid-range and drivability. The LT-1 is a better balanced car so it would likely handle somewhat better.
Everything else being equal...I say the difference is in the drivers...the better driver will win, regardless of the two cars.
Let's say 1970 LT-1...370hp and against a '69 L68...400hp. Not a whole lot of difference at gross hp ratings. The LT-1 weighs less, the 427 will put out more torque, so it's quickness against pure torque...which one?
The LT-1 is a solid lifter engine...the L68 is hydraulic so the small block should wind out higher...maybe higher top ends.
The LT-1 is a high revver and lives for high rpm's. The L68 is more low end and mid-range and drivability. The LT-1 is a better balanced car so it would likely handle somewhat better.
Everything else being equal...I say the difference is in the drivers...the better driver will win, regardless of the two cars.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: Brooklin Ontario
The LT-1 is a solid lifter engine...the L68 is hydraulic so the small block should wind out higher...maybe higher top ends.
The LT-1 is a high revver and lives for high rpm's. The L68 is more low end and mid-range and drivability. The LT-1 is a better balanced car so it would likely handle somewhat better.
Everything else being equal...I say the difference is in the drivers...the better driver will win, regardless of the two cars.
The LT-1 is a high revver and lives for high rpm's. The L68 is more low end and mid-range and drivability. The LT-1 is a better balanced car so it would likely handle somewhat better.
Everything else being equal...I say the difference is in the drivers...the better driver will win, regardless of the two cars.
Later, Rog.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,100
Likes: 12
From: Frederick Maryland
Hydraulic valve lifters can "float" at high rpm's where solid lifters won't. Everything else being equal, a solid lifter engine can rev higher than a hydraulic one. The downside...solid lifter engines require more maintenance to keep the lifters adjusted. Hydraulic lifters are self-regulating in comparison and quieter...no "clack-clack" that solids have, though to many that's music to their ears.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: Brooklin Ontario
That's my quesion, what about the hydraulic lifter limits the rotation of the engine. They ride on the cam the same as a solid lifter.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!
Joe Kucinski
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!
Joe Kucinski
2027 Corvette Buyer's Guide: Everything You Need to Know!
Joe Kucinski
Race Director
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 11,094
Likes: 990
From: Sierra Foothills CA
I poked around a little bit and found a reference giving 1/4 mile stats for the 70 Corvette LT1 at 14.17 at 102+ MPH. I actually remember that test but can't remember which mag did it. Another source gave 1/4 mile stats for the 68 Corvette L68 at 14.1 at 102 MPH. That test was done by Car and Driver mag. Looks like a driver's race. 
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 138
From: Butler Pa
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: Brooklin Ontario
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 138
From: Butler Pa
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 331
Likes: 1
From: Brooklin Ontario
Thanks for the info. On a stock LT1, what are the ideal shift points on a 1/4 mile run?
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 138
From: Butler Pa
I've never seen any horsepower charts so I can't say for sure, but back in the early '80's when I was racing mine, I was shifting it between 7000 and 7200 rpm. I later put a bigger cam in and was shifting at 7800rpm.
Le Mans Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,727
Likes: 38
From: Fremont CA
My $$$ would be on the L86 until the first corner or engine compartment fire (whichever occured first.)
Le Mans Master
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 138
From: Butler Pa
Racer
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim California
I have had mine to 7000 rpm with no ill effects. I think shifting at 6200 is probably about right unless you can run out the finish with out shifting and them go for the overrive. Sure makes beautiful noise at 7000 though. Ed
Le Mans Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,727
Likes: 38
From: Fremont CA
First I thought, man what a bad carb fire this Vette must have went through, then after further study, I realized HEY! some EFFING idiot cut this hood to put a tunnel ram on the motor way back in the day (another reason why I know the Vette is a true 70 LT-1)
