C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C3 Shopping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 11:50 AM
  #21  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Oops, missed one. Am referring to the increasingly popular Mecum auctions. Bloomington Gold features Mecum auctions at their annual collector Corvette events.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #22  
BBCorv70's Avatar
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 111
From: Tolland CT
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
The old overbored blocks can be saved now with new technology. I have personally used this method and can vouch for the reliability and durability of it.

http://web.zzuhl.com/sumebore.html
Good to know, thanks.

I'm still mystified as to why I should be motivated to spend the money to rescue a block which needs this much work vs looking for a 'correct' replacement. The argument that an 'original' engine has all of the factory installed parts is no longer true. It's no longer original other than being the original metal. This doesn't apply to any other casting. Only reason I can think of would be to preserve the numbers. IMO it's still a damaged/repaired block. Counter to the original reason numbers were important, evidence the engine wasn't molested, low mileage, etc.

If it were a rare block, restoration replacement difficult or impossible to find, sure, I'd save it then.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #23  
v2racing's Avatar
v2racing
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 289
From: Spring Park MN
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
There's really no practical reason to build one of these things up and swap in a hot rod engine.

If you want a fast car get a new Z06 and you will never worry again about what cam to put in your '70 model 454. For that matter even the '01 Z06 which is now very cheap will run circles around whatever you did to a C3 and for many thousands less... and you won't have something that matters much if you manage to tear it up.
This is about as far from reality as it gets. A huge number of us on this forum hop up these cars because we want to and it is fun for us! Visit the Tech forum once in a while. I don't want a 01 ZO6, I want my C3, and besides, an 01 ZO6 couldn't even get close enough to my C3 to smell the fumes from my exhaust, unless of course it was hopped up too. But then why hop up an 01 ZO6 when you can buy an 11 ZR1?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 12:27 PM
  #24  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by BBCorv70
Good to know, thanks.

I'm still mystified as to why I should be motivated to spend the money to rescue a block which needs this much work vs looking for a 'correct' replacement. The argument that an 'original' engine has all of the factory installed parts is no longer true. It's no longer original other than being the original metal. This doesn't apply to any other casting. Only reason I can think of would be to preserve the numbers. IMO it's still a damaged/repaired block. Counter to the original reason numbers were important, evidence the engine wasn't molested, low mileage, etc.

If it were a rare block, restoration replacement difficult or impossible to find, sure, I'd save it then.
I understand completely and I can certainly see your point but it's just the way it is with Corvettes. If you have the original engine with the original pad stamp it puts the car in a completely different class. Even a restamp of the original engine is not the same unless it can be documented.

Corvettes were so commonly molested and hotrodded over the years that the hobby has decided to do a complete about-face and pay a premium for those which escaped the fate of the hacker somehow. Cars that cannot pass scrutiny must be assumed to have been reconstructed... to what degree, who knows? Even if only in part.

There are more red 63 Coupes with fuel injection and more 435 horse cars out there with papers right now than Chevy originally built so yes, we do have a problem. You can buy an "aged" tank sticker with whatever you want on it if you need one but then I am told you can also get a new Social Security number on the street in some large US cities if you know where to look.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 12:32 PM
  #25  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by v2racing
This is about as far from reality as it gets. A huge number of us on this forum hop up these cars because we want to and it is fun for us! Visit the Tech forum once in a while. I don't want a 01 ZO6, I want my C3, and besides, an 01 ZO6 couldn't even get close enough to my C3 to smell the fumes from my exhaust, unless of course it was hopped up too. But then why hop up an 01 ZO6 when you can buy an 11 ZR1?
Your C3 with 1963 C2 suspension would flip over upside down trying to keep up with a stock '01 Z06.


I don't know why you would do that to a car that qualifies for a horseless carriage tag and drives like a truck. I say leave them alone and if you really want a hotrod it makes more sense to put 1000 horsepower in something that has the suspension to match. These cars are historical artifacts anyway now.

Last edited by Greg Gore; Dec 15, 2010 at 12:35 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 01:10 PM
  #26  
whitehause's Avatar
whitehause
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 613
Likes: 3
From: Fleetwood PA
Default

Getting back to OP's original question............

With a 68(I have 2 of em) you run in to 1 year only parts. Some of them are pretty costly to replace compared to later years. Push button door latches,ignition key in the dash,numerous interior parts,back-up lights in the lower valance,among others.
They do have the distinction of being the first year though and do seem to bring a bit higher price than all but the 69.

The 69 had a number of "improvements" over the 68, but still retains the "shark gill" louvers in the front fender. Many think this is the most desirable chrome bumper year, so the prices are generally a little higher on average. Weather this is really warranted can be debated forever,but it seems to be the trend.

The 70,71,72 will be the least expensive of the 5 years, but also command a good price for a nice clean car.

Small blocks will obviously cost less than a BB, but they make some really nice SB crate motors these days, so the power difference isn't all that big, if any at all.

I'd check for front and rear end rebuild as these can be costly and time consuming to have done, along with a newer crate motor having been installed. A "freshly rebuilt" motor could be anything, and unless the owner has receipts from a reputable shop, I wouldn't take this into consideration when talking price because frankly there is now way to prove it. Some orange spray paint,and chrome valve covers don't make a rebuilt motor.

The biggest thing to keep in mind is that there are a good number of cars out there, so don't jump at the first thing you see.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 01:11 PM
  #27  
v2racing's Avatar
v2racing
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,666
Likes: 289
From: Spring Park MN
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
Your C3 with 1963 C2 suspension would flip over upside down trying to keep up with a stock '01 Z06.


I don't know why you would do that to a car that qualifies for a horseless carriage tag and drives like a truck. I say leave them alone and if you really want a hotrod it makes more sense to put 1000 horsepower in something that has the suspension to match. These cars are historical artifacts anyway now.
Come to Minnesota this summer, I'll give you a ride!
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #28  
BBCorv70's Avatar
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 111
From: Tolland CT
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
I understand completely and I can certainly see your point but it's just the way it is with Corvettes. If you have the original engine with the original pad stamp it puts the car in a completely different class. Even a restamp of the original engine is not the same unless it can be documented.

Corvettes were so commonly molested and hotrodded over the years that the hobby has decided to do a complete about-face and pay a premium for those which escaped the fate of the hacker somehow. Cars that cannot pass scrutiny must be assumed to have been reconstructed... to what degree, who knows? Even if only in part..
OK, my point is having an original stamp pad says nothing about whether the car was hot rodded, molested, or rebuilt from a hulk. The original stamp pad is one piece of a larger puzzle when a prospective buyer looks at a car. A car with true matching numbers, used for a measure of originality, should have many other 'correct' parts as well with proper casting numbers and date codes. The block I mentioned earlier has absolutely been molested and could be put back into the original car. Is it then 'original' and unmolested? A car without matching numbers has obviousy had at least a block replaced. A car WITH matching numbers should still be looked over very carefully before assuming it's original and paying a premium for it.

I can understand looking for matching numbers if originality is of high importance to a buyer. For others who may not have deep pockets to pay premium prices or those who just want a vintage Corvette for a driver, I can't see this being a high priority. A NOM, identical to a matching numbers will sell for less because it's not original. Makes sense. However that same NOM may be a great fit for someone who wants a driver and isn't worried about selling to collectors in the future.
A buyer should understand the market before buying, know what prices to expect. A NOM should be fine IF the buyer gets it at a fair market price, going to be lower than numbers. So far as future resale goes, I can't see this being a problem unless all buyers disappear other than collectors.


Originally Posted by Greg Gore
There are more red 63 Coupes with fuel injection and more 435 horse cars out there with papers right now than Chevy originally built so yes, we do have a problem. You can buy an "aged" tank sticker with whatever you want on it if you need one but then I am told you can also get a new Social Security number on the street in some large US cities if you know where to look.
Yes, we have seen a Protect-O-Plate turn up for a Corvette which was originally a small block. Now a 435 horse big block, original, etc.. More evidence a buyer needs to be very careful if they want to play in this arena without getting burned.

I'm saying NOMs have their place in the market at a lower price level. Referring to NOMS which are original or correct other than the block. I wouldn't discourage buyers from considering them so long as they realize they generally sell for less.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 03:03 PM
  #29  
Easy Mike's Avatar
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 38,923
Likes: 1,481
From: Southbound
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default

Worth the price of a copy.


Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #30  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by v2racing
Come to Minnesota this summer, I'll give you a ride!
If I am up your way I will take you up on that! I'm sure it will be pretty good or you wouldn't have mentioned it.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 04:39 PM
  #31  
Greg Gore's Avatar
Greg Gore
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,841
Likes: 19
From: CLT, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by BBCorv70
OK, my point is having an original stamp pad says nothing about whether the car was hot rodded, molested, or rebuilt from a hulk. The original stamp pad is one piece of a larger puzzle when a prospective buyer looks at a car. A car with true matching numbers, used for a measure of originality, should have many other 'correct' parts as well with proper casting numbers and date codes.
I think you are right but the block is key because it's one of the serial numbered parts making it an irreplaceable item but many were destroyed over the years and once it gets gone the engine can't be made original again. Not that it's less of a Corvette but it is known in the hobby as NOM now which has become increasingly more important.

Originally Posted by BBCorv70
The block I mentioned earlier has absolutely been molested and could be put back into the original car. Is it then 'original' and unmolested? A car without matching numbers has obviousy had at least a block replaced. A car WITH matching numbers should still be looked over very carefully before assuming it's original and paying a premium for it.
Absolutely! Whether the car has been molested or it's an unmolested original will require scrutiny and detective work which is the responsibility of the buyer... to uncover and detect those issues and make known what we don't know about it yet. The car in question that has had it's original block reinstalled or comes with the original block has the potential to be something which otherwise would be impossible without it.

Originally Posted by BBCorv70
I can understand looking for matching numbers if originality is of high importance to a buyer. For others who may not have deep pockets to pay premium prices or those who just want a vintage Corvette for a driver, I can't see this being a high priority. A NOM, identical to a matching numbers will sell for less because it's not original. Makes sense. However that same NOM may be a great fit for someone who wants a driver and isn't worried about selling to collectors in the future. A buyer should understand the market before buying, know what prices to expect. A NOM should be fine IF the buyer gets it at a fair market price, going to be lower than numbers. So far as future resale goes, I can't see this being a problem unless all buyers disappear other than collectors.

I'm saying NOMs have their place in the market at a lower price level. Referring to NOMS which are original or correct other than the block. I wouldn't discourage buyers from considering them so long as they realize they generally sell for less.
Well said! What if you were faced with having to make a choice between two convertibles in identical condition and both the same color selling for the same price. One was a 1970 LT-1 with the original engine and all other numbers and date codes appearing to be correct and the other car was a '69 435 HP L-71 with a replacement block but all other numbers correct and match the car. Which would you pick?

Last edited by Greg Gore; Dec 15, 2010 at 04:48 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2010 | 06:06 PM
  #32  
BBCorv70's Avatar
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 111
From: Tolland CT
Default

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
I think you are right but the block is key because it's one of the serial numbered parts making it an irreplaceable item but many were destroyed over the years and once it gets gone the engine can't be made original again. Not that it's less of a Corvette but it is known in the hobby as NOM now which has become increasingly more important.



Absolutely! Whether the car has been molested or it's an unmolested original will require scrutiny and detective work which is the responsibility of the buyer... to uncover and detect those issues and make known what we don't know about it yet. The car in question that has had it's original block reinstalled or comes with the original block has the potential to be something which otherwise would be impossible without it. ?
Not entirely if the quest for numbers is based on the assumption the car is a survivor, in this case it really isn't. The motor has been removed, molested, much of it's life used up, then possibly reinstalled. Sure a seller could neglect to tell a buyer anything about this and leave it to the buyer to find out if it ever happens. IMO once a motor is torn down for restoration, most of its major components replaced, it's no longer original. Mechanically no better than a restoration block. I admit many people may still pay a premium for it, mainly because it's past history can be difficult to trace, hard to distinguish from a true survivor. Same goes for replacing other major components on an engine. Without serial numbers the exchange is hard if not impossible to detect, a swap out of heads, intake, carb, etc, being easier to hide.

To me, personally, matching numbers are most significant when we're talking about a low mileage, unmolested original. A survivor. Non matching will not fit this description. When talking about high mileage, restored, rebuilt, etc, the importance is diminished IMO. Sure, worth a bit more than a 'correct' replacement but for me, the gap in value narrows.

Another case for matching numbers would be evidence the motor had not been upgraded to a higher value version. More important when considering high end version ie LT1, L71, etc. Not a guarantee, just another clue.

Originally Posted by Greg Gore
Well said! What if you were faced with having to make a choice between two convertibles in identical condition and both the same color selling for the same price. One was a 1970 LT-1 with the original engine and all other numbers and date codes appearing to be correct and the other car was a '69 435 HP L-71 with a replacement block but all other numbers correct and match the car. Which would you pick?
I'm not sure where you're going with this but I must say I'm partial to big blocks. I'm not familiar with the price brackets either of these cars fall within. My personal choice would be the 69, I'm not terribly concerned about numbers IF the pricing is appropriate. The 69 should be priced lower than a identical copy with matching numbers based on the market. I'd choose the car the I prefer rather than let the numbers drive my choice.

BTW: I prefer a coupe as well. I'd be buying the car for me, my personal preference, not what would bring a higher price at resale.

Getting back to my original posting, I was just saying there's nothing wrong with a NOM so long as the buyer understands the market and knows it will most often sell for less. NOM or not, each candidate should be carefully evaluated to be sure the buyer is getting what they are paying for. When you get into the 'numbers' cars, especially the high end versions, there's a lot more money at stake which may be lost if the buyer isn't well educated.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #33  
Roguester's Avatar
Roguester
Advanced
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by primalurges
Nothing at all, actually let me expand my selection to 72. I like all vettes just going for the chrome bumbers all around.
I became partial to a '69- '72 due to the chrome bumps also and
was in your shoes for the past 2 years, looking for the right combination of number's match, color, etc.
I did lots of research by looking at prices here, magazines,ebay, etc.

I fell in love with the bryar blue '72 (only year for bryar blue) vert manual with side pipes. I wanted a BB and numbers match. I ended up with almost everything, except the BB (the 350 is still fast) and although she is a numbers match, mine has a few custom features the "purists" may not like. She does turn heads, has an awesome paint job and was in the price range you are looking at.

My suggestion is two words only...RESEARCH, PATIENCE.

At the end of the day you are the only one that needs to like it, thats why you need to research to find out what a fair price is for your taste, and then plenty of patience to let some sales go when your price range gets exceeded.

Good luck, my girl was worth the 2 year wait. Enjoy the pics and your quest.





Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #34  
BBCorv70's Avatar
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 111
From: Tolland CT
Default

Originally Posted by Roguester
I wanted a BB and numbers match. I ended up with almost everything, except the BB (the 350 is still fast) and although she is a numbers match, mine has a few custom features the "purists" may not like.
If I may ask out of curiousity, why did you choose numbers matching over getting one with the engine you wanted?

If a non numbers car were available, one with a BB, at a non numbers price, would you have considered it?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2010 | 02:01 PM
  #35  
sperkins's Avatar
sperkins
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 44
From: Macon, GA
Default

I'm considering selling mine. I was gonna hold out until the market turns around, but my race car needs some lovin.





1968 - 327
TRW dome pistons
Performer RPM heads
Comp XR282HR-10 ROLLER Cam
Crane Full Roller Rockers
Performer RPM Air Gap Manifold
360# VBP rear spring.
17x8 TTII's
245/45/17 Dunlop Direzza DZ101.
Hooker Stainless Headers/Pipes.
"Super red" code 81U
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:39 PM.

story-0
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE