When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I agree. Folks either want a convertible or a coupe, each for their own reasons.
In my limited mind, the terms "convertible" and "performance" were never a good marriage. Especially in older cars. And, to a certain degree, even in the newest cars. Structurally, you just can't beat "closing the loop" with a roof, doesn't matter what the year or car.
I agree. Folks either want a convertible or a coupe, each for their own reasons.
In my limited mind, the terms "convertible" and "performance" were never a good marriage. Especially in older cars. And, to a certain degree, even in the newest cars. Structurally, you just can't beat "closing the loop" with a roof, doesn't matter what the year or car.
LOL
Actually, did you know the vast majority of the high performance L88's were convertibles? The convertibles were lighter, and with the hardtop had much better aerodynamics than the coupe.
The main difference in the price is simple market dynamics, if 50% of buyers want coupes and 50% want convertibles, and if only 10% of the available market is convertibles - it's pretty simple to see why there is a premium.
Hi Gs,
In 1971 the coupe was $237 MORE than the convertible.
$5533 Coupe- $5296 Convertible.
For a true project car, $500 more?
For a really well done restoration, $3000-$5000 more?
Regards,
Alan
Hi Gs,
In 1971 the coupe was $237 MORE than the convertible.
$5533 Coupe- $5296 Convertible.
For a true project car, $500 more?
For a really well done restoration, $3000-$5000 more?
Regards,
Alan
Given a comparable condition for a particular year, I would give the convertible a 10-15% advantage.
Easily 30% or more. It is not relevant what the cars cost new. That was then and this is now.
Coupe owners will consistently give you a lower percentage. While not true in all cases, many more coupe owners wish they had a convertible than the other way around. In fact, I don't recall a single post ever from a convertible owner who wished he owned a coupe. That demand causes the large price difference.
One more thing, driving a coupe with the T-Tops off is no where close to driving with a convertible top down.
When I bought my first Corvette in 1977, I bought a '65 BB roadster because the Sting Rays were the "entry level" cars and convertibles were unpopular.
Times change.
However, the old line "the price goes up when the top comes down" is true of not only Corvettes but most cars. It's just simply true that convertibles always (not '63 of course) command a premium in the market. It's fine to prefer a coupe, but if someone paid more for a coupe, they are throwing money away.
It depends on the year. A decent original 68-69 SB convertible could easily fetch $23-25k, while a comparable coupe could bring $15k, give or take a grand.
A '75 convertible could be high teens, while a similar coupe could be 9-10.
The market difference is consistently substantial.
Very nice C5 convertibles can now be had for less than $20,000. The bottom seems to have fallen out of the C5 market. And indeed for C6s as well. For C3s? Who knows.
[/url]
I think VetteBuyers numbers are spot on.
A C3 is in a different market than a C5 or C6.
Most C5 and C6 cars are still daily drivers. Overall, a coupe is a much more practical and comfortable daily driver. Many more C3 cars are weekend or "fun" cars. Nothing more fun than driving with the top down.
Bottom out of C5 market? A C5 is more an old car than a classic.
The 1975 was the last year for the convertible (for almost 10 years) and because of that, it was also the last time the convertible was cheaper than the coupe. From 1986 to the present, the convertible is now more expensive than a coupe.
Easily 30% or more. It is not relevant what the cars cost new. That was then and this is now.
Coupe owners will consistently give you a lower percentage. While not true in all cases, many more coupe owners wish they had a convertible than the other way around. In fact, I don't recall a single post ever from a convertible owner who wished he owned a coupe. That demand causes the large price difference.
One more thing, driving a coupe with the T-Tops off is no where close to driving with a convertible top down.
Coupes are for chickens!
Just kidding! I don't want to P any devoted coupe guys off. Had to chime in with that since somebody else beat me to the "when the top goes down the price goes up" line.
Since my '68 only comes out on nice days, I want to be able to enjoy it. I can't drop the top on my daily driver. I've owned other T-top cars and they just ain't the same as driving a convertible.
I had one once, hated the flex, rattles, etc. JMO..
I put up with those conditions too for the pleasure of open air driving. But the addition of a spreader bar between the front shock towers and a Sharkbar between the soft top mounts eliminated the majority of them. Still not quite as much fun as gassing it with my hand and shifting with my foot on my Fatboy, but damn close.
In fact, I don't recall a single post ever from a convertible owner who wished he owned a coupe.
OK, I'll post it again....I bought my '71 LS5 4 speed Convertible in 1975 right after I sold my '69 350/350 4 speed coupe.
To this day, I wish I had held out and kept looking for a Red/Black 350 4 speed coupe like Alan 71's.